- Original Message -
> From: "Mathias Schindler"
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > Some people -- you can include me in this -- *actively* hate WYSIWYG
> > editing,
>
> my comment was in no way about the pros and cons of WYSIWYG editing
> and the decision at Wiki
2011/1/1 Krinkle :
> Op 1 jan 2011, om 13:50 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
>
>> For the impatient, add
>>
>> document.write('
On 1/1/11, Magnus Manske
wrote: > Works for
me (Mac, Chrome). Not tested anywhere else. Your
OS/browser?
That was on FF3.6, running under X11 on Mac OS.
Not the most mainstream combo :)
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://
Op 1 jan 2011, om 13:50 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
> For the impatient, add
>
> document.write('
I'm getting blank pages after adding that (in Safari, Mac).
I tried using importScriptURI'ing it but to no luck. I presume because
the script internally calls more document.writes.
--
Krinkle
Op 1 jan 2011, om 13:50 heeft Magnus Manske het volgende geschreven:
> For the impatient, add
>
> doc
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 6:17 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 1 January 2011 16:53, Joe Corneli wrote:
>
>> I love it and for the sake of demonstration the deep impact of the
>> approach, I recommend one minor change:
>> Retitle it WYSIFTW
>
>
> +1
I hope you're both referring to #1 on http://en.wikt
Works for me (Mac, Chrome). Not tested anywhere else. Your OS/browser?
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Joe Corneli wrote:
> Unfortunately I would say the thing is broken for me, insofar as
> various keys (e.g. j,k,f,g,h,l) result in editor actions instead of
> characters being inserted.
>
> On
On 1 January 2011 16:53, Joe Corneli wrote:
> I love it and for the sake of demonstration the deep impact of the
> approach, I recommend one minor change:
> Retitle it WYSIFTW
+1
- d.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https
Unfortunately I would say the thing is broken for me, insofar as
various keys (e.g. j,k,f,g,h,l) result in editor actions instead of
characters being inserted.
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Magnus Manske
wrote:
> Happy new year all!
>
> Let me welcome you to this historical year (10 years of W
> I love it and for the sake of demonstration the deep impact of the
> approach, I recommend one minor change:
Retitle it WYSIFTW
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Some people -- you can include me in this -- *actively* hate WYSIWYG editing,
my comment was in no way about the pros and cons of WYSIWYG editing
and the decision at Wikimedia to have its own turing complete language
for content. My comment
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 3:43 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 1 January 2011 12:50, Magnus Manske wrote:
>
>> What I would like is some discussion about
>> * if this approach (working pseudo-WYSIWYG instead of unattainable
>> perfect WYSIWYG) is the way to go
>
>
> The question is: can it be increment
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Mathias Schindler"
>> To: "Wikimedia developers"
>> Sent: Saturday, January 1, 2011 10:34:00 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] WYSIWTF working demo
>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Magnus Manske
&g
- Original Message -
> From: "Mathias Schindler"
> To: "Wikimedia developers"
> Sent: Saturday, January 1, 2011 10:34:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [Wikitech-l] WYSIWTF working demo
> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Magnus Manske
> wrote:
>
>
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Magnus Manske
wrote:
> What I would like is some discussion about
> * if this approach (working pseudo-WYSIWYG instead of unattainable
> perfect WYSIWYG) is the way to go
> * if the code I wrote would be a suitable basis for a system we can
> throw at the general p
On 1 January 2011 12:50, Magnus Manske wrote:
> What I would like is some discussion about
> * if this approach (working pseudo-WYSIWYG instead of unattainable
> perfect WYSIWYG) is the way to go
The question is: can it be incrementally improved, new tags and ways
to deal with them etc, added a
> What I would like is some discussion about
> * if this approach (working pseudo-WYSIWYG instead of unattainable
> perfect WYSIWYG) is the way to go
> * if the code I wrote would be a suitable basis for a system we can
> throw at the general public
> * if anyone is willing to help me with that
>
Happy new year all!
Let me welcome you to this historical year (10 years of Wikipedia!
Wow!) with a working demo of WYSIWTF, a pure JavaScript attempt at
(pseudo-) WYSIWYG wikipedia editing.
For the impatient, add
document.write('
18 matches
Mail list logo
