On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:14:30 -0700, Daniel Friesen
dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:24:46 -0700, Chris Steipp cste...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Nabil Maynard nadr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Tyler Romeo
I think the code has enough scope of getting refined before it is very much
ready to be integrated, especially the client side code.
Also, I think it would be enough time during which I can write some code
for supporting multiple editors, while keeping the existing code robust.
On Sat, Aug 25,
On 08/24/2012 09:28 AM, Derric Atzrott wrote:
MZMcBride for sparking some discussions that really needed to be
discussed.
I was thinking of who I appreciated and thought I would mention MZ, too.
I do, of course, appreciate every one else who has been mentioned, but I
think it is important to
MZ plays an important part: In an organisation like the WMF, groupthink
can be a problem. MZ points out the problems that people would rather
ignore or gloss over.
+1
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:40 AM, akshay chugh chughaksha...@gmail.com wrote:
6. Parser tags, Magic Words (Variables) and a parser function
parser tags -- conference, page, account,
registration,passport,author,submission,event,organizer and
location
This is a disgusting way to store data.
-1
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 11:34 PM, John Du Hart compwhi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:40 AM, akshay chugh chughaksha...@gmail.com
wrote:
6. Parser tags, Magic Words (Variables) and a parser function
parser tags -- conference, page, account,
On 08/24/2012 01:33 PM, Nabil Maynard wrote:
- Persona: Previously called BrowserID. It's come a LONG way in the past
few months, and provides another fairly clean identity/authentication
system.
As a bonus, there is already a BrowserID extension for Bugzilla that
Mozilla is using. Maybe
2012/8/26 Mark A. Hershberger m...@everybody.org:
On 08/24/2012 01:33 PM, Nabil Maynard wrote:
- Persona: Previously called BrowserID. It's come a LONG way in the past
few months, and provides another fairly clean identity/authentication
system.
As a bonus, there is already a BrowserID
On Aug 26, 2012, at 11:04 AM, John Du Hart compwhi...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a disgusting way to store data.
I don't think we need to talk to each other like this.
---
Brandon Harris, Senior Designer, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge:
Daniel, interesting experience.
The case of requested configuration changes is rather simple though:
they require consensus, so the place you were looking for is linked in
comment 0. For the same reason, there's usually no need to tell the
community, the reporter will take care of that.
Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
How about a little email thread for us to say nice things about each
other? Rules: be kind, thank someone, and say why you're thanking them.
I know a few people have thanked you for starting this thread, but I
actually came to appreciate you and your work much more
During your time in GSoC, what type of things did you mentor explain?
Because i've had a quick peruse of your gerrit change sets and I know
they are only minor but I do see a few things that our Coding
Conventions cover as well as stylize (which is a script that is can be
run)
Hello Peachey,
Honestly I never got into reading any Coding Conventions or style guide
while I was developing code for my extension, but I have been going through
them for the past couple of weeks and have been fixing those style issues
with my code since. Its only a matter of time before all
Thanks so much for all of your help with this Daniel. The Planet feeds have
been a bit neglected for a long while but I know that the people who read
them really really appreciate that we keep them going. The new version is
really nice and has fixed a couple weird issues we've been having.
To
If there are issues with the old standard, there is no significant
advantage to use of the old spec (besides the case that it already exists,
etc...), and you are intending to actually use the standard rather than
just throw it out for people to use. Then that's really a valid situation
to
Central Auth has been around for about 5 years now and we still lack a
API to interact with it. There is no
blocking/unblocking/locking/unlocking ability at all. see
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23821 who do I need to
bribe/torture/put a fire underneath in order to get basic
You know the rules:
If you suggest it and no one else volunteers,
then you are now the primary person in charge of getting it done...
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:05 PM, John phoenixoverr...@gmail.com wrote:
Central Auth has been around for about 5 years now and we still lack a
API to interact
if i knew php (may it forever rot in hell) it would already be done.
Since I dont know php it is up to someone else
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:24 PM, David Whitten whit...@netcom.com wrote:
You know the rules:
If you suggest it and no one else volunteers,
then you are now the primary person in
I would take it on, but unfortunately I'm trying to work on three different
things (and classes are starting for me). But if my time frees up as winter
draws closer I might consider doing it.
*--*
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015
Major in Computer Science
John wrote:
Central Auth has been around for about 5 years now and we still lack a
API to interact with it. There is no
blocking/unblocking/locking/unlocking ability at all. see
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23821 who do I need to
bribe/torture/put a fire underneath in order
MediaWiki Bugzilla Report for August 20, 2012 - August 27, 2012
Status changes this week
Bugs NEW : 413
Bugs ASSIGNED : 66
Bugs REOPENED : 32
Bugs RESOLVED
We need some sort of think tank (well some thing with a better name)
non-profit that people donate to. To have it hire people to crank out
MediaWiki features outside of just the stuff WMF wants.
I'd love to spend 80% of my time cranking out fringe MediaWiki features
where what the
22 matches
Mail list logo
