2009/3/8 Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net:
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 11:20:26 +1100
Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/8 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/8 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On
With Friday's git, I can't run the new winhelp.exe16.
$ cd programs/winhelp.exe16
$ wine winhelp.exe16.so
fails with
err:process:start_process
LZ:\\home\\dank\\wine32\\programs\\winhelp.exe16\\winhelp.exe16
doesn't have an entry point, it cannot be executed
Did I miss some memo?
This is on a 64
David Gerard wrote:
2009/3/8 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Drive C: is not necessarily the truly central drive. I have seen Windows
installs that installed on D: and have C: as a permanently mounted network
share. To assume that drive C: is always what it is... is blasphemy.
However,
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com writes:
With Friday's git, I can't run the new winhelp.exe16.
$ cd programs/winhelp.exe16
$ wine winhelp.exe16.so
fails with
err:process:start_process
LZ:\\home\\dank\\wine32\\programs\\winhelp.exe16\\winhelp.exe16
doesn't have an entry point, it cannot be
2009/3/8 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
David Gerard wrote:
2009/3/8 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Drive C: is not necessarily the truly central drive. I have seen Windows
installs that installed on D: and have C: as a permanently mounted network
share. To assume that drive C: is
I happen to agree with that sentiment, but Wine creates ~/.wine/drive_c and
configures it as C:, for the sake of all common users this is correct.
To force C: to be a fixed drive is not harmful in any case I can think of.
It does not help if you set up wine with an installation in another drive
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:10:13 +
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep. That's why a wiki is nice. If you open it up to everyone to
contribute, you'll get bad stuff but you'll get good stuff you just
wouldn't get otherwise. It's a great format to capture that.
We would use the same
2009/3/8 Forest Hale lordha...@ghdigital.com:
I happen to agree with that sentiment, but Wine creates ~/.wine/drive_c and
configures it as C:, for the sake of all common users this is correct.
To force C: to be a fixed drive is not harmful in any case I can think of.
It does not help if you
2009/3/8 IneedAname wineap...@googlemail.com:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:10:13 +
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep. That's why a wiki is nice. If you open it up to everyone to
contribute, you'll get bad stuff but you'll get good stuff you just
wouldn't get otherwise. It's a great
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
$ cd programs/winhelp.exe16
$ wine winhelp.exe16.so
fails with
err:process:start_process
LZ:\\home\\dank\\wine32\\programs\\winhelp.exe16\\winhelp.exe16
doesn't have an entry point, it cannot be executed
Running
It is definitely possible for Drive C: to be a network share on all versions
of Windows starting from Windows 95. This does not exempt Windows
XP/Vista/2k3/2k8. In fact, a public library in Indiana that I used to go to
before I moved has all their machines set up this way. It takes a LOT of
Also, Drive A: and B: can be used for network shares if you don't have a
floppy drive, but this will break floppy drive support. In general, it isn't
a good idea to allow Drive A: to be a network share, but since few modern
machines have a 5 1/4 floppy drive anymore, Drive B: is up for grabs as a
2009/3/8 Forest Hale lordha...@ghdigital.com:
The problem with mountmgr is that it's not even calling the type function
because the NtQueryVolumeInformationFile is asking the Linux kernel about
this path and the Linux kernel is saying it's in an
NFS filesystem on my computer (which is true),
Is there a Windows string function that expands escape sequences such as
%n, %t, etc, and which is replicated by Wine?
I ask because I have a Windows app that is screwing up because of something
like this. It has a private .ini settings file, and some settings are
stored in that kind of
2009/3/8 Vincent Weber weber.vinc...@gmail.com:
Why do you want to install DirectX on Wine? Wine has DirectX support. :S
Some games/apps want d3dx9_## DLLs, which are currently stubs in Wine.
They are distributed with the DirectX runtime redist, but that doesn't
mean you want full DirectX
2009/3/8 Vincent Weber weber.vinc...@gmail.com:
If it aint broken then don't fix it.
Please use the Reply to all feature so your mail goes back to the
mailing list and not just to me :)
Jeff Latimer wrote:
Note that Inet_Ntop is only available in Vista and Windows 2008. This
patch removes the version testing.
---
dlls/ws2_32/tests/sock.c | 67
++
1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
The problem with mountmgr is that it's not even calling the type function
because the NtQueryVolumeInformationFile is asking the Linux kernel about this
path and the Linux kernel is saying it's in an
NFS filesystem on my computer (which is true), then it's reporting it as a
network drive, and
2009/3/7 IneedAname wineap...@googlemail.com:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:10:13 +
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep. That's why a wiki is nice. If you open it up to everyone to
contribute, you'll get bad stuff but you'll get good stuff you just
wouldn't get otherwise. It's a great
The current appdb system doesn't actually work. Example below.
-- Forwarded message --
From: fcmartins wineforum-u...@winehq.org
Date: 2009/3/8
Subject: [Wine] Re: The pros and cons of a wiki AppDB
To: wine-us...@winehq.org
Well, I can certainly confirm there is a barrier for
2009/3/8 Rick Jones r...@activeservice.co.uk:
Is there a Windows string function that expands escape sequences such as %n,
%t, etc, and which is replicated by Wine?
FormatMessageA/W?
I ask because I have a Windows app that is screwing up because of something
like this. It has a private .ini
On Sunday 08 March 2009 02:43:43 King InuYasha wrote:
Drive C: is not necessarily the truly central drive. I have seen Windows
installs that installed on D: and have C: as a permanently mounted network
share. To assume that drive C: is always what it is... is blasphemy.
However, Wine does make
The wine test suite is making great progress towards
passing on all platforms.
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/rpcrt4:server.html
seems to be the sore thumb at the moment; it passes
on XP and Wine, but fails everywhere else.
I think this is the test that fails on the most platforms.
- Dan
David:
Would you be willing to clean out the ash and trash that will show up with an
open Wiki?
I don't have the time to do this and it REALLY sounds like you are volunteering
since you are pushing this issue so hard. See there are VALID reasons for
doing things the way we do them.
BTW, I
Even without any new features, it seems to me that
passing all tests on all platforms might all on its own
merit a new stable release.
That said, by the time we have that, we might well have
64 bit support working, too...
- Dan
-Original Message-
From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
Sent: Mar 8, 2009 6:59 AM
To: wine-devel@winehq.org
Cc: Wine wine-us...@winehq.org
Subject: Re: [Wine] The pros and cons of a wiki AppDB
2009/3/7 IneedAname wineap...@googlemail.com:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:10:13 +
David Gerard
2009/3/8 James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Would you be willing to clean out the ash and trash that will show up with an
open Wiki?
I already said I would, yes - that the only reason for not just
starting one is to avoid massive duplication of effort.
I don't have the time to do
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote on March 8th:
2009/3/8 James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Would you be willing to clean out the ash and trash that will show up with
an open Wiki?
I already said I would, yes - that the only reason for not just
starting one is to avoid massive
Dan Kegel wrote:
The wine test suite is making great progress towards
passing on all platforms.
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/rpcrt4:server.html
seems to be the sore thumb at the moment; it passes
on XP and Wine, but fails everywhere else.
I think this is the test that fails on the most
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Even without any new features, it seems to me that
passing all tests on all platforms might all on its own
merit a new stable release.
Grouping platforms by age:
2000 and earlier have 75 rows with red or mixed,
XP/2003/Vista/2008
2009/3/8 James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote on March 8th:
2009/3/8 James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Would you be willing to clean out the ash and trash that will show up with
an open Wiki?
I already said I would, yes - that the only
King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com wrote on March 8th:
It is definitely possible for Drive C: to be a network share on all versions
of Windows starting from Windows 95. This does not exempt Windows
XP/Vista/2k3/2k8. In fact, a public library in Indiana that I used to go to
before I moved has all
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote on March 8th:
It almost feels within our grasp for midyear... how 'bout it?
I would like to add that these tests should also pass on the MacOSX platform as
well.
+1 to the idea, Dan.
James McKenzie
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:08 PM, James Mckenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
It almost feels within our grasp for midyear... how 'bout it?
I would like to add that these tests should also pass on the MacOSX platform
as well.
As in, they already do, or as in, that should be a release
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
For that sole reason I started with installing a basic W2K box without
servicepacks and patches. The last remaining few failures on my boxes are
not the easiest ones but there are loads of (easier to
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com writes:
but if you really want to, you can start it with 'wine winevdm
winhelp.exe'.
Tried that just now:
~/wine32/programs/winhelp.exe16$ ~/wine32/wine winevdm winhelp.exe16.so
winevdm: can't exec
'Z:\home\dank\wine32\programs\winhelp.exe16\winhelp.exe16.so':
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com writes:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Even without any new features, it seems to me that
passing all tests on all platforms might all on its own
merit a new stable release.
Grouping platforms by age:
2000 and earlier have 75 rows
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
I don't think tests passing on Windows is a reason for a release, it has
very little impact on the Wine code. In the vast majority of cases these
are tests that already succeed on Wine and on some Windows versions, so
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com writes:
I've been itching to do another release for a while, since
what we have now is a lot better than 1.0.
Your position has been that what's blocking release
is the lack of a new feature (you listed several, any of which
you felt would suffice).
How do you feel
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
Ordinal 117 is CreateUrlCacheContainerA so these tests crashed on
systems with IE5.
I also guess that IsDomainLegalCookieDomainW is only present on IE6 and
higher.
Changelog
Skip some tests on IE5
I of course meant to say Ordinal 117 is CreateUrlCacheContainerA
Ben Klein wrote:
2009/3/8 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
David Gerard wrote:
2009/3/8 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Drive C: is not necessarily the truly central drive. I have seen Windows
installs that installed on D: and have C: as a permanently mounted network
share. To assume
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com writes:
I've been itching to do another release for a while, since
what we have now is a lot better than 1.0.
Your position has been that what's blocking release
is the lack of a new feature (you listed several, any of which
you felt would
As many developers (Dan, Steven) already have mentioned this feature since
2005..:
* On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
* Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com writes:
Also, I was hoping we really had a solution for building 16 bit
executables, but objdump reports that it's all 32 bit code.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Even without any new features, it seems to me that
passing all tests on all platforms might all on its own
merit a new stable release.
By 'all platforms', do you mean all Windows versions, or Linux/OS X/BSD/Solaris?
--
-Austin
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Forest Hale lordha...@ghdigital.com wrote:
I happen to agree with that sentiment, but Wine creates ~/.wine/drive_c and
configures it as C:, for the sake of all common users this is correct.
To force C: to be a fixed drive is not harmful in any case I can think
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Saulius Krasuckas sauli...@ar.fi.lt wrote:
Would it be acceptable to use Open Watcom C compiler to crosscompile the
16-bit part? (v1.8 released two weaks ago)
That's what win16test.googlecode.com already uses, though it uses
the windows version (as we had some
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
64-bit support isn't too far away, so if we put some more effort into it
that should be achievable in the near future
It seems we could reasonably start the release process 3 months
from now.
That would be
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org wrote:
I do have one question though: do we mean regressions relative to any
beta Wine, or just regressions relative to 1.0.1? I prefer the less
strict approach if it means more frequent releases
I think the users will expect
--On Sunday, March 08, 2009 14:12:16 + Rob Shearman
robertshear...@gmail.com wrote:
¦ 2009/3/8 Rick Jones r...@activeservice.co.uk:
¦ Is there a Windows string function that expands escape sequences such
as %n,
¦ %t, etc, and which is replicated by Wine?
¦
¦ FormatMessageA/W?
Hmm,
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Even without any new features, it seems to me that
passing all tests on all platforms might all on its own
merit a new stable release.
By 'all platforms', do you mean all Windows versions, or Linux/OS
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
But now that you ask, we do have a lot of platforms to consider. We
simply can't provide the same level of support for them all.
The gcc project defines three tiers of support. If we did that, it
might look like this:
We would
to list as well
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
Date: 2009/3/8
Subject: Re: Sufficient 1.2 release criterion: passing all tests on
all platforms?
To: Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com
2009/3/8 Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com:
For graphics cards:
1st tier:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
But now that you ask, we do have a lot of platforms to consider. We
simply can't provide the same level of support for them all.
The gcc project
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
The wine test suite is making great progress towards
passing on all platforms.
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/rpcrt4:server.html
seems to be the sore thumb at the moment; it passes
on XP and Wine, but fails everywhere else.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
For Windows conformance test validation:
1st tier: Win XP 32 bit, Win 2003 32 bit, Win Vista 32 and 64 bit,
Win 2008 32 bit
2nd tier: Win XP 16 bit, Win 95, Win 98, Win ME, Win 7 32 and 64 bit
3rd tier: Win 3.1,
2009/3/9 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
Starting the release process three months from now would be a really
good thing. It would put us just in time for the next wave of distro
releases (Ubuntu 9.10 among them), which would get 1.2 to millions of
new desktops. As it stands, only 135,150
I've gone a bit further with my DIB Engine, mostly on gdi32 side, in
order to solve the last problems, at least as seen in my favorite app,
Autocad 2005.
Previous version had a bug related to the *only* .net part of that app
(which was obviously written by a 5 years old child, imho), the layer
Ben Klein wrote:
2009/3/9 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
Starting the release process three months from now would be a really
good thing. It would put us just in time for the next wave of distro
releases (Ubuntu 9.10 among them), which would get 1.2 to millions of
new desktops. As it
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009, David Gerard wrote:
2009/3/8 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Drive C: is not necessarily the truly central drive. I have seen Windows
installs that installed on D: and have C: as a permanently mounted network
share. To assume that drive C: is always what it is... is
Hi Alistair,
Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
Hi,
The spec file specified 4 parameters but it only takes 3.
Validate parameters to XP.
Added test cases.
Tested on win98 and XP.
Changelog:
shlwapi: Correct AssocCreate and tests
+hr = pAssocCreate(IID_NULL, IID_NULL, NULL);
2009/3/9 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
Ben Klein wrote:
2009/3/8 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
David Gerard wrote:
2009/3/8 King InuYasha ngomp...@gmail.com:
Drive C: is not necessarily the truly central drive. I have seen Windows
installs that installed on D: and have C: as a
Hi Robert,
Robert Wilhelm wrote:
Third try of my effort to get create vbscript skeleton similar to
jscript one.
Your patch series looks good for me, except one little problem:
+#include windef.h
+#include winbase.h
+#include winuser.h
+#include ole2.h
+#include dispex.h
+#include
Paul Vriens wrote:
Two minor things:
There is no need to to check the return value of GetModuleHandle as
ws2_32 is already imported.
Could you add a win_skip() somewhere so we know that some tests are
skipped on some platforms?
Done. Have resubmitted the set again.
2009/3/9 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/3/8 James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote on March 8th:
2009/3/8 James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
Would you be willing to clean out the ash and trash that will show up with
an open Wiki?
I
Please disable file attachments on Wiki. There are no way to verify their
validity and for the past week it's been a constant source of spam.
IMHO file attachment does not belong on text only Wiki. If anyone needs to
attach a patch a two - they can link it to the one in ML archives or even
2009/3/9 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com:
2009/3/9 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/3/8 James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net:
If we move to an open Wiki, be prepared to be very busy. I've seen
spambots get past most, if not all, of the verification systems and bomb
away.
I come
66 matches
Mail list logo
