On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 11:22 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Correct VarBstrFromDate for dates between DATE_MIN and 1601
Has this been rejected out of hand or is it still being considered?
Bill
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 18:07 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 11:22 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Correct VarBstrFromDate for dates between DATE_MIN and 1601
Has this been rejected out of hand
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:32 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only solutions I see are:
+ Leave it as it is (and hard luck to anyone who uses dates in the range
1/1/100 to 1/1/1601)
That's certainly the best way, unless we find an app
On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 13:34 +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:29 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:49 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
Does anyone know where a call
On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:49 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
Does anyone know where a call to OLE2A is going to enter wine?
Presumably OLE2A returning null means that the thread ran out of stack
space?
What is OLE2A? I do not see
On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:29 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 07:49 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:32:59PM -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
Does anyone know where a call to OLE2A is going to enter wine?
Presumably OLE2A returning null means
Does anyone know where a call to OLE2A is going to enter wine?
Presumably OLE2A returning null means that the thread ran out of stack
space?
Bill Medland
On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 18:05 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 12:28 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
Can anyone point me in the correct direction for this?
On one machine the text displays correctly.
On the other the characters are totally wrong
setting WINEDEBUG to +font
Can anyone point me in the correct direction for this?
On one machine the text displays correctly.
On the other the characters are totally wrong
If I install the arial32.exe then the characters are displayed correctly
and attractively
If I remove the sserife.fon (and the arial fonts) then the
On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 22:08 +0100, Nick Law wrote:
Huw Davies wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:03:03AM +0100, Nick Law wrote:
Nick Law wrote:
Well, I don't quite know what happened there with the fonts, however
my fonts are now back working by deleting the contents of the
On Tue, 2007-17-04 at 12:28 -0700, Bill Medland wrote:
Can anyone point me in the correct direction for this?
On one machine the text displays correctly.
On the other the characters are totally wrong
setting WINEDEBUG to +font the one weird thing I note is that on the
machine where things
On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 12:03 +0900, Byeong-Sik Jeon wrote:
Hi,
MS-Windows's RegQueryKeyInfo function test result:
1. MSDN means TCHARS when it says 'character' for this function.
== No.
2. why RegQueryInfoKey is returning a number that is too small
== No. Currently Wine's
On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 02:18 +0900, Byeong-Sik Jeon wrote:
Hi,
Currently regedit is not defined UNICODE.
The point are max_val_name_len, valName, valNameLen.
Not max_val_size, valSize.
RegQueryInfoKey set the max_val_name_len to the size of the longest
value name, in characters. This
On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 06:17 +0900, Byeong-Sik Jeon wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-04 at 02:18 +0900, Byeong-Sik Jeon wrote:
Hi,
Currently regedit is not defined UNICODE.
The point are max_val_name_len, valName, valNameLen.
Not max_val_size, valSize
Can someone remind me how we used to set the debug channels back in late
2004?
On Wed, 2007-28-03 at 08:41 +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
searching for it if it is obvious to someone.
wine: Call from 0x126ce72
I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
searching for it if it is obvious to someone.
wine: Call from 0x126ce72 to unimplemented function
nspr4.dll.PR_GetPhysicalMemorySize, aborting
wine:
On Tue, 2007-27-03 at 23:32 +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
Am Dienstag 27 März 2007 23:18 schrieb Bill Medland:
I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
searching for it if it is obvious to someone
registry
search output is done to a specified file. It can be redirected to
STDERR, though. (tested on 0.9.29, 0.9.33)
c) Use the shell
wine regedit -e /tmp/$$.reg branch cat /tmp/$$.reg rm -f /tmp/$
$.reg
Regards
Vit Hrachovy
--
Bill Medland billmedland at shaw.ca
On Tue, 2007-20-03 at 21:12 +0100, Vit Hrachovy wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
b) Enhance regedit to be able to output to STDOUT. By default registry
search output is done to a specified file. It can be redirected to
STDERR, though. (tested on 0.9.29, 0.9.33)
c) Use the shell
wine
Is there something wrong with the list server?
I am being bombarded with last year's emails.
Bill Medland
On Tue, 2007-20-03 at 16:45 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 3/20/07, James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/07, Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there something wrong with the list server?
I am being bombarded with last year's emails.
Same here.
Clarification
On Thu, 2007-08-03 at 06:40 +1100, Nathan Williams wrote:
Hey everyone,
I have been planning to do some work on wine for a while now, but
after I started working I got myself a new programming job.
I'm worried about the copyright of any external work I do, so I need a
little advice.
What
On Wed, 2007-28-02 at 09:43 +0100, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:17:04 -0800
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any chance that someone with the ability can create the fedora
core 4 wine rpms for version 0.9.30?
Bill Medland
If you want to I can upgrade
Is there any chance that someone with the ability can create the fedora
core 4 wine rpms for version 0.9.30?
Bill Medland
RedHat 8 or 9 there. Are they not there or
am I looking in the wrong place?
--
Bill Medland
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 17:19 +0100, Wojciech Arabczyk wrote:
Hello
trace:wininet:HTTP_GetResponseHeaders raw headers: LHTTP/1.1 302
Found\r\nDate: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:47:17 GMT\r\nServer: Apache/2.0.54
(Debian GNU/Linux)\r\nLocation:
On Fri, 2007-12-01 at 13:45 +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
At first:
Congratulations for the commit of your Patches.
On Do, 2007-01-11 at 09:29 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Implement GetInstalledDrivers in odbccp32
BOOL WINAPI
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 07:56 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
Wine-0.9.27's iexplore.exe isn't downloading gecko for me.
It tries, but then gives up, and says html rendering is disabled.
+wininet shows that it did connect to winehq.org and got
a redirect to sourceforge:
On Fri, 2007-05-01 at 16:14 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Implement SQLGetInstalledDrivers
Implement a basic SQLInstallerError
Add test framework and some initial tests
Would it help if this was split into three patches?
On Mon, 2007-08-01 at 12:11 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 1/8/07, Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Add tests structure to odbccp32
You need to add tests for this patch to be accepted. Also, you've
labeled the test suite 'error'. How many
On Mon, 2007-08-01 at 12:38 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 1/8/07, Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-08-01 at 12:11 -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On 1/8/07, Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Add tests structure to odbccp32
the
process.
--
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) and the wiki.
I presume we are maintaining both (i.e. we have not obsoleted the docs).
So where do we send patches to the sgml these days? Still to wine-
patches?
Then (I'm using urlmon as a model)-
What's with the 'generated.c' autogenerated files?
--
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and its refusal to let me
have any control.
Is it just me or is it the program?
(and can anyone tell me how to stop it wrapping
and if not then the patch will have to wait until monday :-(
)
--
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--c000-0046}
err:ole:CoGetClassObject apartment not initialised
*** HUH ??? ***
TIA
Bill Medland
and the C standard (1999) explicitly states
that it is not permitted.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On May 4, 2006 04:14 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
So, my next problem
What's the status of custom marshaling, especially
out-of-process? Is it supposed to be quite well developed
(in which case I am trying to find out why our case is
different) or is it still only just
On May 4, 2006 07:19 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
trace:ole:CoUnmarshalInterface (0x7be8c7a8,
{b3b13603-a675-11d2-9b95-00104b71eb3f}, 0x7be8c794)
trace:ole:get_unmarshaler_from_stream Using custom
unmarshaling trace:ole:CoCreateInstance
(rclsid={62a1cafb-1940-798f-6859
So, my next problem
What's the status of custom marshaling, especially
out-of-process? Is it supposed to be quite well developed (in
which case I am trying to find out why our case is different) or
is it still only just started?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
guess I will start trying to learn
it.
Comments?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On May 2, 2006 11:44 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
before I start trying to get up to speed on it.
Anyway; if someone is already working on that sort of thing
then there is probably little point in me trying to learn it
all. However if no-one is then I guess I
On April 21, 2006 06:58 pm, Tom Spear (Dustin Booker, Dustin
Navea) wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
I have just noticed that configure is telling me
Warning: Freetype or Fontforge is missing
Why does it think that?
(freetype-devel version 2.1.9 is installed)
Is fontforge installed? You
I have just noticed that configure is telling me
Warning: Freetype or Fontforge is missing
Why does it think that?
(freetype-devel version 2.1.9 is installed)
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On April 21, 2006 10:46 am, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
I have just noticed that configure is telling me
Warning: Freetype or Fontforge is missing
Why does it think that?
(freetype-devel version 2.1.9 is installed)
What about fontforge? Is that installed?
No
I just tried wrc for the first time and fell over this.
Internal error (please report) ./ppl.l 824: long long constants
not implemented yet
Is anyone intending doing anything about it in the near future?
Is it a reasonably simple thing to implement?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
This is a link to the API:
http://www.cmsfx.com/en/platform/VTapi/
Thanks,
Klaus
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
then I suggest at least a comment that it is deliberate; it
sounds counterintuitive to me.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On December 22, 2005 06:15 pm, Mike McCormack wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
+static const WCHAR dfv[] = {
+'M','S',' ','S','h','e','l','l',' ','D','l','g',0
};
+if (!dialog-default_font)
+{
+DWORD len = strlenW (dfv) + 1;
+dialog-default_font
stage, or do we?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On December 20, 2005 02:56 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Module: wine
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: e0d4df6bb7c009c8cbfa579c22c8d9406025f65c
URL:
http://source.winehq.org/git/?p=wine.git;a=commit;h=e0d4df6bb7
c009c8cbfa579c22c8d9406025f65c
Author: Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date
on that default font can be referenced without testing if
it is non-null
In my particular case it is null (because the property is not
found).
Presumably if msi_dup_property returns null then some other
default should be used, e.g. MS Shell Dlg.
Any comments? Anyone volunteering to fix it?
--
Bill
On December 15, 2005 01:00 am, Scott Ritchie wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 14:51 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
I am intending doing some work and submitting some patches
to improve the integration with the operating system
desktop integration. Rather than waste time coding up my
ideas
On December 15, 2005 01:00 am, Scott Ritchie wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 14:51 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
I am intending doing some work and submitting some patches
to improve the integration with the operating system
desktop integration. Rather than waste time coding up my
ideas
up the handler
for the file type and going from there (possibly even using the
native OS's handler e.g. pdf files).
Any complaints?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On December 8, 2005 03:08 am, Peter Berg Larsen wrote:
--- Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I turn on WINDEBUG=+relay to see what is being passed.
And wine segfaults.
Anyone know what is going on?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Keith Dunwoody wrote:
I'm running into the same
On December 8, 2005 09:40 am, Mike McCormack wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
Wine crashes the first time it enters/uses a entry/function
using the debug setup from ntdll/relay.c:RELAY_SetupDLL.
(Which happens to be a RtlInitUnicode in
kernel/module:GetModuleHandleW) .
So is anyone actively
On December 8, 2005 09:15 am, Bill Medland wrote:
On December 8, 2005 03:08 am, Peter Berg Larsen wrote:
--- Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I turn on WINDEBUG=+relay to see what is being
passed.
And wine segfaults.
Anyone know what is going on?
On Wed, 7
On December 8, 2005 02:40 pm, Bill Medland wrote:
On December 8, 2005 09:15 am, Bill Medland wrote:
On December 8, 2005 03:08 am, Peter Berg Larsen wrote:
--- Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I turn on WINDEBUG=+relay to see what is being
passed.
And wine
I turn on WINDEBUG=+relay to see what is being passed.
And wine segfaults.
Even
export WINEDEBUG=+relay
wine --version
which yields
0009:Call kernel32.__wine_kernel_init() ret=77ed4e4d
Segmentation fault
I can't use gdb and I can't use winedbg.
Anyone know what is going on?
--
Bill Medland
that GENERIC_READ in ReadFile to FILE_READ_DATA (but
not until this fix is in place).
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
, that is in the object
area.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On October 3, 2005 06:03 pm, Bill Medland wrote:
Advice please. This looks a little too big to be done without
discussion.
Ah well. Following the deathly hush and the fact that Vitaliy
appears to have volunteered I'll just forget about it then!
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
) read the bad current text to mean During
this call if the file is opened for reading but the
FILE_SHARE_READ is not set then the call will fail.
Anyway, I'll have a quick look.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
, for
testing purposes. I'd be quite willing to help out but it would
suit me best if you were to take the lead.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
comments?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On February 23, 2005 10:41 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:30:50 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
Does anyone know any site or book or something with a decent discussion
about the problems of the different threading models and their
implementations?
That'd be the developers guide
/ is very useful, too...
Or maybe even winedump...
Andreas Mohr
Yes, but they aren't going to throw the arguments and return types out are
they? The only way to do that, surely, is disassembly to see what is
referenced off the stack and returned?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
, but something like:
if (mkdir (name, 0700) == -1)
{
if (errno != EEXIST) fatal_perror (Ensuring directory %s, name)
}
Changelog:
* server/request.c
Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix a race condition in create_dir().
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
to have found it necessary to
bypass/hack/modify/override them indicates to me that there is something to
understand.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
on mine (running GenuineCheck.exe).
However that might be because I had already run it a couple of times before I
added the key.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On February 1, 2005 11:53 am, Sergey Efimoff wrote:
On Feb 1, 2005, at 9:04 PM, Bill Medland wrote:
I have windows binary-only, third-party .DLL library without any
source
files.
I would like to use it in my unix-based project, which is compiled
with
usual GNU C compiler. Wine
DSNs, nor can't it connect to one of the
DSNs when entered manually.
On 24. J 2005, at 15:29, Bill Medland wrote:
presume you are running a program called myprog.exe from the command
line.
You type, at the command line,
export WINEDEBUG=odbc
wine myprog.exe 2odbc.log
and when
and
delete this email from your system without copying or disseminating it
or placing any reliance upon its contents.
--
--
Bill Medland
Programmer
ACCPAC International, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Corporate: www.accpac.com
Hosted Services
of the code would be other than the pure ascii portion of utf-8?
The only bits I can think of are comments and literal strings. And certainly
on my system I can put utf-8 in them.
Rob
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
! :(
Cheers,
Martin
Try running with
export WINEDEBUG=odbc
See if the debug tells you any more.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
myprogram?
Cheers,
Martin
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On January 20, 2005 07:37 am, Bill Medland wrote:
On January 20, 2005 03:31 am, Huw D M Davies wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 05:58:59PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
On January 18, 2005 03:00 pm, Huw D M Davies wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:08:17PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
(Huw
On January 18, 2005 03:00 pm, Huw D M Davies wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:08:17PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
(Huw?)
Do I need to dig deeper to understand this or is there a defect in the
logic. If there are ttf fonts available does that mean a poor ttf match
will be selected even
? Or add some sort of Ignore these fonts list in the Wine fonts area?
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On January 18, 2005 02:04 pm, Robert Shearman wrote:
Hi,
I have also fixed (kinda) the issue Bill
Medland was reporting where doing a CreateInstance for an IUnknown
interface was a bit messed up (this is bad programming anyway as it
doubles the number of RPC calls required).
Maybe. (After
On January 18, 2005 03:00 pm, Huw D M Davies wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:08:17PM -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
(Huw?)
Do I need to dig deeper to understand this or is there a defect in the
logic. If there are ttf fonts available does that mean a poor ttf match
will be selected even
:trace:ole:stub_manager_int_release after 1
0016:trace:ole:stub_manager_int_release after 0
0016:trace:ole:stub_manager_delete destroying 0x77e4fd90 (oid=2)
0016:trace:ole:stub_manager_delete_ifstub m=0x77e4fd90, m-oid=2,
ipid={---c000-0046}
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL
of 4 bytes from 0xac.
0010:warn:ole:stub_dispatch_thread exiting with hres 80004005
0016:fixme:ole:read_pipe Read only 0 of 4 bytes from 0x64.
0016:warn:ole:stub_dispatch_thread exiting with hres 80004005
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
not actually do anything.
In restrospect I think you are probably right that in the code we ought to do
that translation and add a comment. Then we can simply continue with a
standard bit test.
Cheers,
Paul.
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
not map OXID a to
apartment object
000b:trace:ole:register_ifstub constructing new stub manager
000b:warn:ole:register_ifstub Could not map OXID a to apartment object
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On January 11, 2005 08:02 am, Bill Medland wrote:
Any idea what is going wrong in the OXID handling here?
See below for theory
Is a the first thread of the new process? Is the problem that it should
be b?
(I've removed a few extraneous traces)
(This is after the COM_CreateApartment fixes
On January 10, 2005 11:08 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:56:30 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
Bill Medland ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Minor typo correction and term expansion changes
Bill, if that document was helpful I'll write some more docs for you.
Hi Mike
It was sort-of-helpful
)
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
...
--
Bill Medland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webhome.idirect.com/~kbmed
On January 5, 2005 05:59 am, Rob Shearman wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
Anyone any idea what is wrong here?
In particular any idea why the xCall occurs almost immediately before the
TMProxyImpl_Connect that would give it a channel to use?
(The software works fine with a native oleaut32.dll
On December 21, 2004 10:50 pm, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Thanks for the feedback
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+RPC_STATUS RPC_ENTRY DceErrorInqTextW (unsigned long e, unsigned short
*b) +{
+DWORD count;
+if (acceptable_rpc_code (e))
It would be much more natural to make
On December 22, 2004 06:47 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My comments are probably not clear enough. That function isn't asking if
the error code is a valid error code (which is relevant to
FormatMessage). Actually !acceptable_rpc_code is the list
On December 22, 2004 08:25 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Bill Medland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh. I thought we wanted to do the same as Windows does!!!
Don't ask me why but for some error codes (as detailed in the patch),
even though FormatMessage can return a perfectly reasonable
stuff stops working. I suggest as a working hypothesis that the Win95/98
ole32 does not support the REG_EXPAND_SZ. (Does the Windows 98 Registry code
actually allow you to add a REG_EXPAND_SZ to the registry or doe it maybe
automatically do the expansion on the way into the registry?)
--
Bill
On December 21, 2004 11:59 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 11:41 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
SNIP
- Help us improve builtin DCOM (yay!)
- Hack the registry and manually expand the strings so MSXML is happy
If you're able to commit time to the first one then perhaps Rob and I
On December 18, 2004 05:03 am, Robert Shearman wrote:
Bill Medland wrote:
On December 17, 2004 01:56 pm, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:34:53 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
Well, it gets me past the illegal memory reference; I can start looking
at what else failed now.
In case you
On December 18, 2004 08:10 am, Mike Hearn wrote:
On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 07:46 -0800, Bill Medland wrote:
0013:trace:ole:listener_thread Process listener thread starting on
(\\.\pipe\WINE_OLE_StubMgr_00100011)
...
0009:fixme:ole:PIPE_GetNewPipeBuf Could not open named pipe
On December 17, 2004 12:10 am, Raphael wrote:
On Friday 17 December 2004 01:01, Bill Medland wrote:
(Jason?)
Currently (after many weeks without concentrating) wine doesn't build; it
fails in dlls/wined3d/drawprim.c line 594 with GL_TEXTURE0 undefined.
That's because of the definition
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
