Oliver Stieber yahoo.co.uk> writes:
> I think the ChooseVisuial fallback if either, the client glx version is 1.3 or
glXChooseFBConfig
> returns NULL is OK.
>
Falling back to glXChooseVisual() if glXChooseFBConfig() fails should be
sufficient. We probably should not depend on glx 1.3 only since
--- Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:05:07PM +, Oliver Stieber wrote:
> > >From ATI's documentation on pbuffers, but still about glx and X11
> > [...]
> > To use pbuffers, you need a custom version of "libGL.so.1.2" installed -
> > including our GLX 1.3 emulatio
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 02:05:07PM +, Oliver Stieber wrote:
> >From ATI's documentation on pbuffers, but still about glx and X11
> [...]
> To use pbuffers, you need a custom version of "libGL.so.1.2" installed -
> including our GLX 1.3 emulation code. Our driver installation tool will
> automa
--- Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:55:05AM +0100, Raphael wrote:
> > > Daniel is putting a patch together, his card only supported glx 1.2 and
> > > glXChooseFBConfig required 1.3. There was some old code that works with
> > > 1.2
> > > that he's using.
> >
> > N
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:55:05AM +0100, Raphael wrote:
> > Daniel is putting a patch together, his card only supported glx 1.2 and
> > glXChooseFBConfig required 1.3. There was some old code that works with 1.2
> > that he's using.
>
> No, all cards "supports" glx 1.3.
> GLX is implemented on X
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 02:09, you wrote:
> >
> > Yak, can you test what is the error X provide ?
> > and without BUFFER_SIZE at 0 ?
>
> Daniel is putting a patch together, his card only supported glx 1.2 and
> glXChooseFBConfig required 1.3. There was some old code that works with 1.2
> that
--- Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 21 November 2005 12:30, Oliver Stieber wrote:
> > --- Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sunday 20 November 2005 18:28, Daniel wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > to Oliver Stiebel and anyone else interested:
> > > > I reported about a bu
On Monday 21 November 2005 12:30, Oliver Stieber wrote:
> --- Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 November 2005 18:28, Daniel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > to Oliver Stiebel and anyone else interested:
> > > I reported about a bug in wine 20050930 in October. Then Oliver
> > > sugges
--- Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 20 November 2005 18:28, Daniel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > to Oliver Stiebel and anyone else interested:
> > I reported about a bug in wine 20050930 in October. Then Oliver suggested
> > he might write a little test application for this bug. Well, the
On Sunday 20 November 2005 18:28, Daniel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to Oliver Stiebel and anyone else interested:
> I reported about a bug in wine 20050930 in October. Then Oliver suggested
> he might write a little test application for this bug. Well, the bug is
> still present in wine 0.9.1. Searching the
Hi,
to Oliver Stiebel and anyone else interested:
I reported about a bug in wine 20050930 in October. Then Oliver suggested
he might write a little test application for this bug. Well, the bug is
still present in wine 0.9.1. Searching the web turned up a simple app
for windows which is equivalent
11 matches
Mail list logo
