I think tests would be appropriate.
.
That said, if it is really a problem, I can add some basic ones. But I don't
think so.
Message du 22/02/10 13:06
De : Henri Verbeet
A : wine-devel@winehq.org
Copie à :
Objet : Re: [PATCH 4/5] d3dx9_36: Implement D3DXFindShaderComment (based on
code from Luis Busquets)
I think tests
On 22 February 2010 13:43, Christian Costa titan.co...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Sure. Having tests is better but in this case there is no chance for
regression.
I usually write tests for my personnal pursose or to compare behaviour
against real windows or native dll.
You write tests to prove your
@winehq.org
Objet : Re: [PATCH 4/5] d3dx9_36: Implement D3DXFindShaderComment (based on
code from Luis Busquets)
On 22 February 2010 13:43, Christian Costa wrote:
Sure. Having tests is better but in this case there is no chance for
regression.
I usually write tests for my personnal
On 22 February 2010 15:15, Christian Costa titan.co...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
More generally I would say that over-reviewing is not a good thing. It does
not bring much in term of
quality and slow down development. Thrust is the base of a community.
Sure, but that trust has to be justified. I can
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
On 22 February 2010 15:15, Christian Costa titan.co...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
More generally I would say that over-reviewing is not a good thing. It does
not bring much in term of
quality and slow down development. Thrust is the base of a community.
Sure, but that
