Francois Gouget wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure what nas is for, but it seems to be 'network audio system',
I haven't seen any use for it, except that it causes a 30 seconds
slowdown at showing 'audio' tab in winecfg. I don't think anyone uses it.
For
Le lundi 23 avril 2007 à 09:23 -0600, Andrew Ziem a écrit :
[...]
By the way, in LTSP, ESD's major deficiency is not being able to control
the volume from things like the GNOME sound applet, so there's some
interest in (but no support for) changing to PulseAudio.
LTSP on Ubuntu feisty uses
Jonathan Ernst wrote:
Le lundi 23 avril 2007 à 09:23 -0600, Andrew Ziem a écrit :
[...]
By the way, in LTSP, ESD's major deficiency is not being able to control
the volume from things like the GNOME sound applet, so there's some
interest in (but no support for) changing to PulseAudio.
LTSP
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 14:41 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Christoph Frick schreef:
why do you compile the drivers in - or why do have the files around for
them? my audio dialog just shows oss and alsa; the others get dropped at
compile time. also there might be other platforms that have
There are 5 different audio drivers for linux, I think this is a bit
overkill, so I propose to remove the esd and nas drivers, I don't think
anyone uses esd, especially that since for that task alsa can be used
now since dmix addon.
I'm not sure what nas is for, but it seems to be 'network audio
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
There are 5 different audio drivers for linux, I think this is a bit
overkill, so I propose to remove the esd and nas drivers, I don't think
anyone uses esd, especially that since for that task alsa can be used
now since dmix addon.
I'm not sure what nas is for, but it
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
[...]
I'm not sure what nas is for, but it seems to be 'network audio system',
I haven't seen any use for it, except that it causes a 30 seconds
slowdown at showing 'audio' tab in winecfg. I don't think anyone uses it.
For esd I think it's best
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:01:43PM +0200, Vit Hrachovy wrote:
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
There are 5 different audio drivers for linux, I think this is a bit
overkill, so I propose to remove the esd and nas drivers, I don't think
anyone uses esd, especially that since for that task alsa can be
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:02:31AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
There are 5 different audio drivers for linux, I think this is a bit
overkill, so I propose to remove the esd and nas drivers, I don't think
anyone uses esd, especially that since for that task alsa can be used
now since dmix
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:54:17PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:01:43PM +0200, Vit Hrachovy wrote:
I'm using esd actively. There are some audiocard drivers OSS provide and
ALSA don't.
I haven't used NAS at all and the winecfg delay annoys me too.
Regards
On 4/12/07, Vit Hrachovy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
There are 5 different audio drivers for linux, I think this is a bit
overkill, so I propose to remove the esd and nas drivers, I don't think
anyone uses esd, especially that since for that task alsa can be used
now
Christoph Frick schreef:
why do you compile the drivers in - or why do have the files around for
them? my audio dialog just shows oss and alsa; the others get dropped at
compile time. also there might be other platforms that have to use those
audio drivers - why drop something that works?
I
why do you compile the drivers in - or why do have the files around for
them? my audio dialog just shows oss and alsa; the others get dropped at
compile time. also there might be other platforms that have to use those
audio drivers - why drop something that works?
I was just proposing to
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Hi Maarten,
I'm using esd actively. There are some audiocard drivers OSS provide and
ALSA don't.
I haven't used NAS at all and the winecfg delay annoys me too.
Regards
Vit
What has esound (esd) to do with OSS?
If you have soundcard only OSS supports, you
14 matches
Mail list logo
