On 07/02/2011 04:21 AM, Austin Lund wrote:
> On 1 July 2011 06:10, wrote:
>>
>> gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
>> -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
>> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wempty-body -Wstrict-prototypes
>> -Wtype-limits -Wwrite-strings -
On 1 July 2011 06:10, wrote:
>
>
> gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
> -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wempty-body -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wtype-limits -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o adsiid.o
> adsiid.c
>
> Otherwise WINE compilation with 32bit gcc gets broken (not yet
> 100%
> > confirmed, see the discussion with Wylda on wine-devel mailing
> list).
> > Small patch to test for the issue -
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/bug_test.patch
Now i can confirm for sure, that simple testcase bug_test.pa
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 07:57, wrote:
>
>>
>> $ cd wine-git
>> $ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
>> $ patch -p1 < raw.patch
>> $ ./tools/make_requests
>> $ ./configure
>> $ make
>>
>> works here:
>
> Thanks Austin for testing, but this raw.patch is already modified
> and works for
On 06/30/2011 06:07 PM, Vincas Miliūnas wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 05:57 PM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
>>> $ cd wine-git
>>> $ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
>>> $ patch -p1 < raw.patch
>>> $ ./tools/make_requests
>>> $ ./configure
>>> $ make
>>>
>>> works here:
>> Thanks Austin for testing
On 06/30/2011 05:57 PM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
>> $ cd wine-git
>> $ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
>> $ patch -p1 < raw.patch
>> $ ./tools/make_requests
>> $ ./configure
>> $ make
>>
>> works here:
> Thanks Austin for testing, but this raw.patch is already modified
> and works for m
>
> $ cd wine-git
> $ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
> $ patch -p1 < raw.patch
> $ ./tools/make_requests
> $ ./configure
> $ make
>
> works here:
Thanks Austin for testing, but this raw.patch is already modified
and works for me too. I would need to retest the series of nine
ind
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Austin English wrote:
> 2011/6/30 :
>>> Ok, try with a modified header:
>>>
>>
>> OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
>> in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
>> ago and did many regression tests, reve
2011/6/30 :
>> Ok, try with a modified header:
>>
>
> OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
> in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
> ago and did many regression tests, reverse reg.testing, found faulty
> commit even though it was covere
On 06/30/2011 05:31 PM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
>> Ok, try with a modified header:
>>
> OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
> in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
> ago and did many regression tests, reverse reg.testing, found faulty
> c
> Ok, try with a modified header:
>
OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
ago and did many regression tests, reverse reg.testing, found faulty
commit even though it was covered by several other faul
On 06/30/2011 02:19 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
>> There is some garbage added to the patch code, I
>> suspect that the way
>> you downloaded the patch corrupted it.
>>
>> I wrote a bash script that will download the
>> patches correctly and apply
>> them:
>>
>> git clean -fd
>> git reset --hard orig
> There is some garbage added to the patch code, I
> suspect that the way
> you downloaded the patch corrupted it.
>
> I wrote a bash script that will download the
> patches correctly and apply
> them:
>
> git clean -fd
> git reset --hard origin/master
> for i in 75876 75883 75878 75882 75881 758
On 06/30/2011 12:22 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
>> The patch is rebased against today's commits -
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
> The good news is, that this combo patch successfully compiles here.
>
> The bad new is, that today's 9 newly sent patches still fails here.
> I did regressi
> > Maybe gcc 4.4.5 is too old or i'm extremly dumb today :-/
> >
> > Regards,
> > W.
> >
> I'm not a WINE developer, just scratching my own
> itch :)
>
> I have the same gcc version. Well, this might be a
> legitimate issue,
> another important thing would be to see the
> ./configure output log
On 06/29/2011 01:25 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
>> It fails on the #include "winternl.h" line and
>> these are standard
>> includes, you can try to replace
>>
>> [code]
>> #include
>> #include
>> [/code]
>>
>> code fragment with
>>
>> [code]
>> #include "config.h"
>> #include "wine/port.h"
>>
>> #i
> It fails on the #include "winternl.h" line and
> these are standard
> includes, you can try to replace
>
> [code]
> #include
> #include
> [/code]
>
> code fragment with
>
> [code]
> #include "config.h"
> #include "wine/port.h"
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> [/code]
>
> maybe that
On 06/29/2011 12:28 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
>> Looks like there is some external interference,
>> try compiling in a clean
>> bash environment; some googling suggests that
>> LIBRARY_PATH variable
>> should be unset -
>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=30418
>> First be sure it can com
> Looks like there is some external interference,
> try compiling in a clean
> bash environment; some googling suggests that
> LIBRARY_PATH variable
> should be unset -
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=30418
> First be sure it can compile the original master
> branch without issues.
On 06/29/2011 12:10 AM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
> So i another try:
> * rm -rf * in my git tree.
> * git checkout -f 2497a91f6b1326988dd5ea56dc4052cbcc2e521d
> * applied all nine patches
> * ./tools/make_requests
> * configure + make with -O2 and got again:
>
>> In file included from raw_input.c:28:
So i another try:
* rm -rf * in my git tree.
* git checkout -f 2497a91f6b1326988dd5ea56dc4052cbcc2e521d
* applied all nine patches
* ./tools/make_requests
* configure + make with -O2 and got again:
>
> In file included from raw_input.c:28:
> ../include/winternl.h:2359: error: expected
> declarati
>
> Did you run ./tools/make_requests ?
>
> --
> -Austin
>
Nope. So i did:
./tools/make_requests
make distclean
./configure followed by make and got (-O0 issue??):
gcc -c -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -D__WINESRC__ -Wall -pipe
-fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wempt
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 13:16, wrote:
>
> Hi Vincas, i wanted to give bug 27600 a try. So on top of
> wine-1.3.23-50-g2497a91 i applied patches:
>
> 1. 75818
> 2. 75819
> 3. 75831
> 4. 75830
> 5. 75829
> 6. 75820
> 7. 75821
> 8. 75822
> 9. 75823
>
> but i end up with failure during the buildup:
>
Hi Vincas, i wanted to give bug 27600 a try. So on top of
wine-1.3.23-50-g2497a91 i applied patches:
1. 75818
2. 75819
3. 75831
4. 75830
5. 75829
6. 75820
7. 75821
8. 75822
9. 75823
but i end up with failure during the buildup:
gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
-D_US
24 matches
Mail list logo
