Generally all OSs will if sending from a local process will use the
address of the outgoing interface for the packet.
If the packet is forwarded and no NAT is used the address will be routed
via the interface suggested by the routing table.
So local routing can be a real pain, policy based
Hi
Wireguard is a layer 3 system. As a result you must route traffic not bridge,
this also means that ip forwarding must be enabled.
You will need to firewall the traffic or setup a separate routing table.
Other routers in your network will need to know about the IP addresses
allocated to
On 24/11/21 9:48 pm, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 18:20, Robert Dahlem wrote:
I could always install Quagga or Bird and use OSPF. But that might be a
bit of an overkill for a simple active/passive failover.
RIP, OSPF, BGP, EIGRP. Either can work. And would IMO be
On 28/8/21 7:14 am, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 07:05:45 +0930
Mike O'Connor wrote:
On a 1500 link I'm having to use 1280 to get ipv6 to successfully go
over a wireguard link.
Then it is not a true 1500 MTU link, something in-between drops packets at a
lower bar. Or maybe not all
Hi
On a 1500 link I'm having to use 1280 to get ipv6 to successfully go
over a wireguard link.
I really think wireguard should be able to fragment and send via
multiply UDP packets.
wireguard works very well other than this issue, performance is
extremely good.
Mike
On 28/8/21 2:46 am,
Hi L.
No wireguard is a layer 3 vpn, a bridge is layer2
Cheers
Mike
> On 25 Apr 2021, at 2:02 pm, lejeczek wrote:
>
> Hi guys.
>
> Apologies, I'll bother you guys as I failed to find some better places to
> ask, I searched for forums etc. but failed.
>
> Can wiregurard ifaces be enslaved
Hi Jason
I'm not a windows users so can not test, but it seems to me that
Microsoft have API's to indicate the network status.
This to indicate if there is a connection
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/wininet/nf-wininet-internetgetconnectedstate
This to indicate if there is
Hi
> Reduce MTU of the WG interfaces to accomodate for overhead. See
> https://www.mail-archive.com/wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com/msg01856.html for
> calculations of by how much.
So yes it was, but I can not understand why. I worked out the MTU be
pinging back from the VPN server to the clients
> Reduce MTU of the WG interfaces to accomodate for overhead. See
> https://www.mail-archive.com/wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com/msg01856.html for
> calculations of by how much.
Ok but why all of a sudden, I'll go thought the process again and see.
>> inet6 addr: 2506:c500:ff4:1::aa/64
Hi All
For the last few weeks my Wireguard link which I use to as my default
gateway has been having issues with TCP connections stalling.
I've been trying to work out what is wrong. I just noticed that the
Wireguard link has dropped packets at both ends.
wg-p2p Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr
On 12/4/20 4:43 am, m...@pmfarmwald.com wrote:
> I have some older routers that run OpenWRT just fine, but are a bit slow at
> Wireguard (3-5 MBytes/s for SMB transfers) and which are too slow for
> playing HD movies.
> For these routers/uses I don't care about security, I just want a VPN to
>
Hi Miki
I'm doing basically what your talking about but with OSPF.
I do not use wg-quick, instead I configure the Wireguard in the network
interface file like /etc/network/interface on all the machines.
iface wg-p2p inet static
address xxx.xxx.xxx/xxx
pre-up ip link add
On 22/2/19 11:05 pm, Emanuele Bernardi wrote:
> I'm very interesting about make it work with dkms, could you please
> explain the process? thanks
> Emanuele
>
> On 22/02/19 00:29, Derrick Lyndon Pallas wrote:
>>
>> I just use DKMS to do it. Check out WireGuard to /usr/src, ln -s
>> WireGuard/src
Hi All
So I've been using Wireguard to route part of my class C to my home for
about 4 months now, but for the last few days the traffic stops for a
short while every few minutes.
I can not think of anything which has changed, turning OpenVPN back on
fixes everything. I've tried reducing the
14 matches
Mail list logo
