I've had 2 of the Bullet5HP's have bad connectors, not the 2's. Being the
geek type, took them apart and found that the fingers coming off the
connector had very little solder on them and none was only under the
connector and not on the sides or top. Essentially only enough to tack it
on. The
I haven't come across that little issue yet, thanks for the heads up! I
like the price and some of the shortcuts contribute to that but you're
right, some things need to be more rugged for where they are installed and
even HOW they are installed. The mounting brackets are fantastic, I was
Trango uses SMA connectors for their external antennas, but with
LMR240, rather than whatever it is that UBNT uses.
2009/12/18 Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com:
I haven't come across that little issue yet, thanks for the heads up! I
like the price and some of the shortcuts contribute to
I'm from Maine. Its good for Mainers. Its better for GWI and Fletcher
Kittredge who's been looking to overbuild Fairpoint for a very long
time. Now he gets his chance. Its going to be bad for the small
provider. You're still not going to get a break on connectivity. It
will follow GWI's
Yeah, that would be a nicer cable. Honestly I'm afraid of popping the
connector off the UBNT ones when I have to bend it so sharply. It must have
been another tradeoff since the area between the rocket and the connector on
the antenna is so small, you probably couldnt bend a much thicker cable
No, but they could have put the connectors on the bottom of the
antenna, and on the bottom of the radio (where they belong!) And used
a 12 piece of lmr240.
On 12/18/09, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Yeah, that would be a nicer cable. Honestly I'm afraid of popping the
connector
Why would you want the connector on the bottom? So it can fill up with
water?
Being on the top, the water will run over the connector and not fill it.
Makes sense to me.
Of course, we still seal them up.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Parr jeremyp...@gmail.com wrote:
No, but they
You got it, pal!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 11:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Bullet2HP
No, but they could have put the connectors on the
Curt - wouldn't Mr. Kittredge be open to discussing using wireless to extend
the last mile?
Aaron D. Osgood
Streamline Solutions L.L.C
P.O. Box 6115
Falmouth, ME 04105
TEL: 207-781-5561
FAX: 615-704-8067
MOBILE: 207-831-5829
aosg...@streamline-solutions.net
http://www.streamline-solutions.net
You'd have to ask him. I know that he's in the DSL business and is
interested in being Maine's phone company. This project not only
provides relief for the desparate middle mile in maine, but if you look
at the map on the project website
(http://www.threeringmaine.com/map.html ) you'll see
I have not used any UBNT M series units yet so I have a couple of questions.
Is an NS M5 compatible with Mikrotik 802.11N or does it have to be used
with the Rocket M basestation?
Can it be used with Mikrotik 802.11A?
LaRoy McCann
Data Technology
Yes a NSM5 can talk with a MikroTik 11n unit. Currently they have some
issues with the M5's talking with Legacy (802.11a) equipment a new firmware
should be forth coming shortly. The latest solved a lot of the problems but
not completely.
/ Eje
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks,
Eje Gustafsson wrote:
Yes a NSM5 can talk with a MikroTik 11n unit. Currently they have some
issues with the M5's talking with Legacy (802.11a) equipment a new firmware
should be forth coming shortly. The latest solved a lot of the problems but
not completely.
/ Eje
OK, I've got a good one. I’m trying to pass public subnets to a couple of
customers. They worked before I switched them to a new, closer tower.
Bascially, it will not show the public IP when checking at
whatismyip.combut rather my firewall ip. Obviuosly, I can get on the
net with the public
ip's.
Working with GWI beats working with Fairpoint. They are a skilled and
fair project leader. Any participant will have the same advantages
provided by the project and could tap in at any splice point on the
rings. I counter that it's not a monopoly if no provider can have more
than 25% of it.
I know this is different but I thought it might be of interest. I was just
playing with an Bullet M2 and couldn't get my Macbook Pro (802.11n capable) to
connect unless I switched from the default 40MHz channel and use the 20MHz
channel.
Greg
On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Data Technology
Routing or firewall setup issues. I pass a /24 and a /8 (NAT) across my entire
network. I use one place of NAT (well a few users still have in house NAT) I
would do traceroutes from and to the end IPs and see where things start to look
wrong.
RickG wrote:
OK, I've got a good one. I’m trying to
I just configured a Bullet2 that thinks its a Picostation2! See attached.
WTH?
Bullet2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
We have seen similar craziness with Ubiquiti stuff. Do you think it is the
wrong firmware load in this case?
Mark
On 12/18/09 5:29 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I just configured a Bullet2 that thinks its a Picostation2! See attached.
WTH?
Must certainly have the wrong firmware from the factory! Have you tried to
flash to the right firmware? I wonder if it will bounce the Bullet firmware
as being invalid!
Interesting, Rick. Let us know, that's not fun.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Yes, I did flash is with 3.5 for Bullet2 but no help. Therefore, I'm
guessing the Pico ID on the main page must come from the board itself? Now I
wonder if a Pico board will fit into a Bullet? Another strange thing I
noticed was it came from the factory with the the 3.4 beta firmware on it.
I've
I agree but traceroutes run perfectly. Just to be clear, here is the setup:
Inet-RB450G(Firewall)-WRAP/StarOS-CPE-Customer Device (Cisco).
The subnet is 204.62.63.76/30.
RB450G has the subnet defined in the filter rules as chain forward.
The wireless interface on the WRAP has 204.62.63.77
yes I ran into that too
On Fri 12/18/09 2:02 PM , Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com sent:
I know this is different but I thought it might be of interest. I was just
playing with an Bullet M2 and couldn't get my Macbook Pro (802.11n capable)
to connect unless I switched from the default 40MHz
just dont enable AirMAx as it is Ubnt only TDMA
On Fri 12/18/09 12:38 PM , Data Technology w...@dtisp.com sent:
Thanks,
Eje Gustafsson wrote:
Yes a NSM5 can talk with a MikroTik 11n unit.
Currently they have some issues with the M5's talking with Legacy
(802.11a) equipment a new
Mmmm. bridging CPE, make sure its not proxy arping.
Check your RIP, if its turned on, on both the wrap and Csico, should be seen.
Where is the IP that is doing NAT located, on the RB450? The only way I had that
work correctly was to drop all chain rules and tell NAT to source 10.0.0.0/8
when
Rick,
I have never had a Pico apart, don't even own, but I checked with UBNT and
the Pico and the Bullet is the EXACT same hardware on the inside, only
difference is the antenna connector. My guess is, somehow a Pico board
slipped into the Bullet bin by accident before the antenna connector was
or nstream as that is Mikrotik only
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:36 PM, jai...@budget.net wrote:
just dont enable AirMAx as it is Ubnt only TDMA
On Fri 12/18/09 12:38 PM , Data Technology w...@dtisp.com sent:
Thanks,
Eje Gustafsson wrote:
Yes a NSM5 can talk with a MikroTik 11n unit.
The Bullet boards even say Pico on them.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Rick,
I have never had a Pico apart, don't even own, but I checked with UBNT and
the Pico and the Bullet is the EXACT same hardware on the inside, only
difference is the
Didn't have AirMax enabled and still 40MHz channels didn't work. Shouldn't they
work? Is that what 802.11n is? Anyway, it works with 20MHz channels.
Greg
On Dec 18, 2009, at 8:36 PM, jai...@budget.net wrote:
just dont enable AirMAx as it is Ubnt only TDMA
On Fri 12/18/09 12:38 PM , Data
29 matches
Mail list logo
