Exactly, People confuse the two all the time. But yeah, I'm talking TW
Telecom, And yes, Fiber :D
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(877) 804-3001 x106
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 11:09 PM
To: WISPA General
After many days of searching it looks like I found something in the sub
$20k range. The ME-C6524GT-8S appears to do it all.
On 09/08/2010 04:16 PM, Jon Auer wrote:
Needing full BGP routes takes you out of the realm of cheap Layer 3
switches...
You need to worry about TCAM (hardware route
All WISPs,
This week, WISPA filed comments on the TV Whitespaces once again. The FCC
is set to make decisions on this crucial topic very soon. It is imperative
for all operators to take a few minutes and file individual comments to the
FCC about Unlicensed use of the TV Whitespaces spectrum
Low coast antennas? Must be a new style.
If you are affiliated with any ARRA projects, be sure to mention the
need for the spectrum to fully realize the potential.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/11/2010 9:54 AM, Rick Harnish wrote:
All
Thanks for link. I should be able to find something there.
Kevin
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of RickG
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 6:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] direct bury pole?
What about a flag pole?
Run the AP and SM in WDS mode.
the radios do some funny things with ARP with it off.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 7:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
Thanks. The only clients to the AP are laptops. Would the WDS setting do
anything then?
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
Run the AP and SM in WDS mode.
the radios do some funny things with ARP with it off.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From:
I think a lot depends on what the signal strength is on the CCU (AU)
side. I several links that from the EUM (SU) are worse than -85, but at
the CCU they are better than -78. Mind you these links aren't supper
fast though, especially on the upload. It's okay if they're a lower
usage customer.
Oh, nevermind.
That IP is a Time Server. http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi. Probably not
related to your problem.
Is the AP running the latest firmware?
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Greg Ihnen
Sent:
Mmmm. They need to update their dns. Makes it look like a cable user.
Non-authoritative answer:
140.178.56.24.in-addr.arpa name = 24-56-178-140.co.warpdriveonline.com.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
Oh, nevermind.
That IP is a Time
Laptops will only do station mode. Other stations can do WDS but only if
the ap supports it.
On Sep 11, 2010 2:31 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. The only clients to the AP are laptops. Would the WDS setting do
anything then?
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Jerry
Yeah, the very latest. 3.5.1
I should have recognized the IP, that's the one I use for NTP.
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 2:11 PM, Jerry Richardson wrote:
Oh, nevermind.
That IP is a Time Server. http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi. Probably not
related to your problem.
Is the AP running
When submitting a filing, what is supposed to go in the details section. There
is a check box, drop down that says Comments, then a file number test box.
Thanks
Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
877-804-3001 x102
From: Rick Harnish
Correction (Wednesday is not the 16th - oops).
Your comments must be filed before 5 PM ET on Thursday, Sept. 16.
Please file soon.
Thank-you,
jack
On 9/11/2010 11:00 AM, Jack Unger wrote:
Comments must be on file by
I started turning on WDS mode on some of my UBNT AP's but started getting
weird issues such as dropping stations. These are in bridge mode. Does the
mode matter?
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.comwrote:
Run the AP and SM in WDS mode.
the radios do some
Beware of the TCAM size on that box.
IIRC it hasn't been able to take full internet routes since 2008
because of that limitation.
On Saturday, September 11, 2010, Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.net wrote:
After many days of searching it looks like I found something in the sub
$20k range.
Has anyone used or owned a Bil-Jax Towable Boom Lift? Been looking..
Can't afford a decent boom truck so the economics work for one of these boom
lift trailers.
Robert West
Just Micro Digital Services Inc.
740-335-7020
Logo5
image001.gif
I am thinking its time to use a switch as a switch and a router as a
router. I am thinking about using this for the MPLS backbone and put in
actual 7200/7300 routers at locations where full BGP needs to be
offered. What I haven't yet worked out is whether two routers can
establish a BGP
On the AP? No. The station has to be bridge.
On Sep 11, 2010 4:26 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I started turning on WDS mode on some of my UBNT AP's but started getting
weird issues such as dropping stations. These are in bridge mode. Does the
mode matter?
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at
I've got a customer who bought a very nice lift truck after he got a
contract to work in Louisiana after Katrina. I've used a few times and it
works well. It only has 65k miles. He no longer needs it and said he'd let
me have it for $20k. I dont recall what year it is but its fairly new in
good
Rented one several times. Works fine but would not want to use it on a regular
basis.
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Robert West
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 1:37 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Bil-Jax Boom Lift
WDS just simply allows transparent bridging. We run our in AP ADS and Station
WDS and it works fine - better actually.
Are you saying that after you changed to WDS you started dropping stations? I
would suspect it's coincidence but I could be wrong.
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
-
What I haven't yet worked out is whether two routers can establish a BGP
peering session over a VPLS VC.
-
Should not be any different than setting up BGP over a Physical
Connection.. As long IP is being passed it should not be a problem.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet
Yes. It could coincindence but I'll give it another whirl. What about
Spanning Tree?
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.comwrote:
WDS just simply allows transparent bridging. We run our in AP ADS and
Station WDS and it works fine - better actually.
Are
That makes sense.
BGP over a VPLS VC shouldn't be any different than BGP across a
Ethernet cable AFAIK.
Have you checked out the Alcatel-Lucent SR series routers? I'm
supposed to be talking to one of their sales reps next week. They nare
really trying to gain market share and i hear hey have some
No I haven't. But I will look into it now. Let me know how your talk
with the sales guys goes?
On 09/11/2010 02:38 PM, Jon Auer wrote:
That makes sense.
BGP over a VPLS VC shouldn't be any different than BGP across a
Ethernet cable AFAIK.
Have you checked out the Alcatel-Lucent SR series
Yikes $40k again. I am trying to come up with a sub $12k solution.
On 09/11/2010 02:39 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
No I haven't. But I will look into it now. Let me know how your talk
with the sales guys goes?
On 09/11/2010 02:38 PM, Jon Auer wrote:
That makes sense.
BGP over a VPLS VC
I have not enabled it so I don't know the impact.
Seems like it can't hurt but maybe the radios think there is a loop when there
isn't and is shutting down?
Just guessing at this point.
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of RickG
Sent:
Would a RB1000 and HP Procurve work?
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Matt Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.net wrote:
Yikes $40k again. I am trying to come up with a sub $12k solution.
On 09/11/2010 02:39 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
No I haven't. But I will look into it now. Let me know how your
Anyone have experience with a wind farm coming into their area. They are
planning on 29 wind turbines about 8 miles from my tower. Should I panic and
raise objections or what.
Thanx
NGL
WISPA Wants You! Join
Not at all, I have 95 I think with 2-5 miles.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:43 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Wind Turbines
Anyone have experience with a wind farm coming into their area. They
Doesn't help you but I would imagine you would be a grinch to object.
On Sep 11, 2010 6:44 PM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote:
Anyone have experience with a wind farm coming into their area. They are
planning on 29 wind turbines about 8 miles from my tower. Should I panic and
raise objections or what.
Not much more of an issue than a new grain leg!
Go make a deal for tower space!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 6:49 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wind Turbines
Check with your local department of transportation. Think for a moment
Idiot hits pole, pole goes down. Pole bent or broken. DOT has to get rid
of it. Before it goes to recycler, go get it for scrap value.
You may have to call a few DOT facilities to get what you want but a good
size
Sadly. I am with you on that condemnation.
*Sigh*
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Patient
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 1:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] testing... What happened?
Um But I've seen tube be stronger than solid. Physics?
Or maybe..
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 2:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Grain leg pipe
Well heck, if
You can direct bury a steel pole the same as a wooden. You just lose height
the same as wooden.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Kevin Owen
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:47 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] direct bury
I'm hearin' ya. What were the issues?
Bob-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bil-Jax Boom Lift
Rented one several times. Works
20k be pretty cool for my taste. Been looking g at a couple for 5 to 7
grand. Ten years old but certified, as I am as well.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
It's just a hassle to use. The outriggers need alot of room. Very springy
Jerry Richardson
Sent Mobile
On Sep 11, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Robert West
robert.w...@just-micro.commailto:robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
I’m hearin’ ya. What were the issues?
Bob-
From:
Rick:
Since I know you have MikroTik in your network, do you have any that have a
Rocket plugged into them? If you do, open up Winbox, go to tools, Ping.
Change the timeout to 100, and ping your rocket. Do you have any lost
packets? We're seeing 2-7% packet loss. Are you using 100mbit?
I’m listening. I looked at that at the local rental. Plastic and long. Was
an issue with me. Maybe I need to rent one to see if I can break it.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010
Mac OS X (bash) says:
ping -i.4 192.168.7.1
ping: -i interval too short: Operation not permitted
using sudo makes it work.
It might be the same for Linux.
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Kevin R. Battersby wrote:
On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote:
That is from the CCU side. In all
I LIKE breaking things. At least with the “Proper” rental contract……
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Robert West
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 9:47 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Bil-Jax Boom Lift
I’m
What about using flood ping -f. Does that work in Linux. I use that in Mac OS
X.
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Kevin R. Battersby wrote:
On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote:
That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping
spikes. Is there any other
Part of their mac polling will turn it off if their is not traffic for a while.
If I remember correctly their is a high priority setting that will keep it up.
I will check all that at the office Monday.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:34 PM, Kevin R. Battersby ke...@battersby.net
I have Mikrotik 750 / 750G, with Multiple Rocket M5 for a typical POP..
I am not getting any packet loss, when doing pings from the MK to Rocket
M5, with the timeout changed to 100.
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
On 9/11/2010 8:52 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
Rick:
Since I know
47 matches
Mail list logo
