Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!

Yep. Right now I can check, uncheck.. All the same. Still passes through. They should default it to pass through and forget about it. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Greg Ihnen Sent: Sunday, September 26, 20

Re: [WISPA] MUM

Shuttle J --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Tr

Re: [WISPA] Today is a Momentous Day for our Industry - Sept. 23rd, 2010

This was probably already answered but what is the theoretical range given the power limits in the upper channels. Sent from my iPhone4 On Sep 26, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote: > I have 12 towers surrounding Yakima with my head-end in Moxee. > > On 9/26/2010 10:28 AM, MDK wrote:

Re: [WISPA] Today is a Momentous Day for our Industry - Sept. 23rd, 2010

I have 12 towers surrounding Yakima with my head-end in Moxee. On 9/26/2010 10:28 AM, MDK wrote: It appears that you have, even if VHF-Lo turns out to be not workable, several UHF channels. Of course, if you have real estate on the hills to the north, east, and south, you're not too bad off, e

Re: [WISPA] MUM

Best way to get to the conference center from the airport? On 9/26/2010 5:00 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote: If anyone is interested, hitting up the Hotel Bar/Grill for some food and drinks! *--- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified

Re: [WISPA] MUM

Its just an Axiomtek NA-720 820 I believe. Look 'em up. -- Blake Covarrubias On Sep 26, 2010, at 17:16, Francois Menard wrote: > Las mail was meant to be private. > But I can deal with the fact that this is also publicly known now... > > F. > > On 2010-09-26, at 8:14 PM, Francois Menard wrote

Re: [WISPA] MUM

Btw.. Good prime rib... Large pizza is huge too.. -Original Message- From: Dennis Burgess Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 5:00 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] MUM If anyone is interested, hitting up the Hotel Bar/Grill for some food and drinks! --

Re: [WISPA] MUM

Las mail was meant to be private. But I can deal with the fact that this is also publicly known now... F. On 2010-09-26, at 8:14 PM, Francois Menard wrote: > Dennis, > > I want to OEM your powerrouter 732's to put a SIP proxy on them. > > Are you bringing in one on site ? > > F. > > On 2010-

Re: [WISPA] MUM

Dennis, I want to OEM your powerrouter 732's to put a SIP proxy on them. Are you bringing in one on site ? F. On 2010-09-26, at 8:00 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote: > If anyone is interested, hitting up the Hotel Bar/Grill for some food and > drinks! > > >

Re: [WISPA] MUM

Anytime. Let me know when. Coming from Quebec. Look forward to meet you all. I'm meeting JJ wednesday and am going to bug him about his 3.65 strategy. F. On 2010-09-26, at 8:00 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote: > If anyone is interested, hitting up the Hotel Bar/Grill for some food and > drinks! >

[WISPA] MUM

If anyone is interested, hitting up the Hotel Bar/Grill for some food and drinks! --- Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http:

Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!

I just upgraded my units to 5.2.1. In the GUI the passthrough checkbox is unchecked even though it's passing through. I checked the box, applied, and it's still unchecked but passing through. On the forum someone told me to reset the unit, reflash the firmware, and reset it again. I'm going to

Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!

Same browser as when I configured it and I can still turn the secondary ether PoE on and off on other Nano5Ms. Am running 5.2.1, yeah, even downgraded. Posts on UBNT forums are building on this issue. After 20 days or so it will burn out. Here is what I came up with after I took it down.

Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!

Yeah, I've seen funny browser stuff too, so I tried all three below. Browsers: Safari 5.0.2, Firefox 3.6.10, Chrome 6.0.427.63. (all under Mac OS X) I have Win XP and 7 so I could try IE if you think that would help. I kind of doubt it after already trying 3. I'll try 5.2.1. Thanks! Greg On S

Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectral_efficiency#Comparison_table Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:03 PM, John Scrivner wrote: > The actual frequency band has nothing to do with data capacity. The > carrier

Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height

The actual frequency band has nothing to do with data capacity. The carrier CHANNEL BANDWIDTH is the important number. If a 6 megahertz wide channel is used at say 200-206 MHz then any modulation system used on that carrier should be able to carry the same amount of data as an equivalent channel at

Re: [WISPA] Today is a Momentous Day for our Industry - Sept. 23rd, 2010

It appears that you have, even if VHF-Lo turns out to be not workable, several UHF channels. Of course, if you have real estate on the hills to the north, east, and south, you're not too bad off, either. ( wife's mother lives in Yakima, son's going to be going to YVCC sometime soon, I thi

Re: [WISPA] Today is a Momentous Day for our Industry - Sept. 23rd, 2010

Oh... I thought it was just me having issues with the site. If you move REAL slow, it seems to work fine. ++ Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy 541-969-8200 509-386-4589 ++ -- From: "Jeromi

Re: [WISPA] UBNT Nano5M Secondary RJ45 Port PoE Burnout!

Two quick points, I have seen something like this due to browser.what browser are u usingdid you try a different browser. Also, 5.2.1 full has been released...try that as well... Faisal On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Greg Ihnen wrote: > I had some trouble with an NS5M running 5.2.1 R