Hi All,
I have a friend about a mile N/E of Barron lake (right outside Niles)
Michigan that can't find internet service.
Do you cover it, or know of coverage?
Jeff
574-220-7826
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
Are you loosing connectivity to the client radios or only loosing data from
them?
What do your link stats show? Signal quality etc.
What are your eirp levels at normally and during the events?
- Original Message -
From: Tom Sharples
To: Wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday,
Clyde, can you be of help here?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Broadwick jeffl...@att.net
To: memb...@wispa.org; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 7:41 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Barron Lake MI Area Coverage?
Hi All,
I have a friend about a
I would like to see a Multiband Mimo PMP System similar to what is being
developed in the LTE-Advanced RF protocol, where a BaseStation can use various
spectrum bands to talk to CPEs...
Imaging having an AP with multiple RF Sections using 2.4,3.x,5.x and aggregate
all bands in a single Layer
Hi Gino,
I wonder if our new 3 in 1 Sector Antenna design will be useful in this
application that you mention here.
We are designing this to save space and lower tower costs and we can fit
different frequencies, gains polarization.
We will also be able to mix Sector and Panel antennas in
There hasn't been much innovation in the marketplace, just going faster.
I'm not sure if I'd want to see your idea first or multi-radio beamforming. I
think it'd be nice to have multiple streams coming out of a given antenna being
directed towards different clients.
-
Mike Hammett
That'd be one sexy product Gino. Two obvious challenges:
1. Lack of international unity in spectrum used for BWA, which hurts the
ability to get to commodity pricing. Of course, this is already being done with
802.11n though, which supports both 2.4 GHz (802.11g compatible) and 5 GHz.
2. The
Looks like Fourway is in the Niles area. Their contact info and
coverage is listed on http://www.towercoverage.com/northamericamap.asp
Jim
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181)
Sent:
Mike,
Respectfully disagree with you. We've just made announcements on tuesday at 4G
world. This is some pretty cool stuff with really interesting features already
available as well as planned
1. http://axxcelera.com/news.php?id=97
2. http://axxcelera.com/news.php?id=95
3.
I think the CPE would be to expensive.
Keeping CPE cost down is key for this industry.
--
On 11/1/2012 2:14 PM, Gino Villarini
wrote:
I would like to see a Multiband Mimo PMP
System similar to
Why? the great thinkg is that you could have single band cpes for low bw
customers and multiband cpes for higher BW customers.
Imagine using 20 mhz from 2.4,3.65,5.2,5.4 and 5.8 that's 100 mhz channel,
with 64 qam and 2x2 mimo is about 800-900 mbps of data!!!
Gino A. Villarini
I think that there are some common bands that would allow a wide market, 2.4
ghz, 3.x ghz and 5.x ghz are fairly widespread, the challenge is to SCALE as
you say... that is something that UBNT achieved using wifi chipsets. The way I
see its is that you might need to think out of the box to
I think the general consensus is that UBNT is abandoning standard WiFi chipsets
in their next version of AirMax since they're reached the limit of what they
can do. I'm thinking they'll be more like AirFiber than the current AirMax.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
That’s what I meant, they piggy backed on the wifi chipset market...
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Thursday,
*nods* build volume cheaply, then you have the volume to do your own thing.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012
I learned what really makes them special though is their commitment to WISPs.
Their gear is far from perfect, but they sure seem eager to make things right
and constantly look for ways to bring value. You'll only hear positive things
from me re them, but not everything is a fit for
we could also then put high gain receive antennas (and maybe even
apms???) at the tower
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Sean Heskett af...@zirkel.us wrote:
what if we Tx to the CPE in 3.65Ghz with 25Mhz channels then we only
have to register the tower location, then Tx to the tower with
I'd argue that the existing Wi-Fi scale allowed Ubiquity to do what they do.
Ergo, the scale happened before them and that's what allowed their commodity
and disruptive pricing to work. Ubiquity is killing the res WISP market, but
its total volume registers not even a blip in terms of total
Hi Patrick,
Let me also chime in
Yes, UBNT has been a market disruptor, and Yes, while they have a good
product, it is not necessarily a 'Fit' for all.
Which brings me to the question that I have been wondering all day
today, since I read your Alvarion Promo / Post.
Can I ask you to list
what if we Tx to the CPE in 3.65Ghz with 25Mhz channels then we only
have to register the tower location, then Tx to the tower with 900Mhz,
2.4Ghz or 5.xGhz???
-sean
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
I think that there are some common bands that would
Faisal, I'll reply offlist.
Patrick Leary
m: 727.501.3735
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 5:52 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Challenge to PMP
Hi All,
it seems that lately the Ubiquiti cables that we installed some time
ago, are filling with water and burning the ethernet interface.
It happened with one cable on one site, then another cable on the same
site, now I have another cable failing on a second site...
Any comment?
Thank
The green level 1 and 2 stuff is junk. Get a receipt and they'll ship you
their new cable. The labor is all at a loss :(
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 1, 2012 7:52 PM, Paolo Di Francesco paolo.difrance...@level7.it
wrote:
When the problem happens, the rssi is frozen so I suspect there's actually no
connectivity any more. Definitely no data. I haven't been able to get someone
to look at the other end while it's happening, to see what they see. During
normal operation the s/n is around 30 to 35 db on the varous
I have a client that is eligible for 4.9 GHz (already have the license), but
the cost\benefit ratio goes to licensed gear over 4.9 GHz. The price isn't much
different, but hte throughput is vastly different and you get real protection.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
25 matches
Mail list logo
