Hi List,
Looking for a 48v regulator/POE to power a Cisco 2960c from 48v solar power
source
I expect that this would have to take a wide range input 40v - 56v and
output a steady 48v
One other question, will the POE be 802.3af or is it 802.3at?
Thanks,
- - -
*Olufemi Adalemo*
f...@adalemo.com
Even the best companies screw up from time to time.. I just got in 10 Gabriel
dual polarity dishes that had single pole feed horns. Things happen. They are
making it right.
-B-
On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:23 AM, Doug Clark d...@txox.com wrote:
To mount your AP..
Most of our WISP antennas, regardless of brand, are being made by a single
company, KBT-USA.com They have been for years now.
I agree, things happen but every once in a while the QC inspectors are on
vacation, yet the factory keeps shipping without their final approval :)
C
*Broadband: Speed,
The dish is most definitely an ARC dish. ARC is the only company that
puts that pipe on the left side to mount the Rocket to.
Thats clever.
That sucks that the factory screwed up. I am sure it was an isolated
thing though. You bought two of them, right? Was both of them FUBAR'd?
That's the new UBNT Edge Router line. I was not aware that they have actually
shipped to general public yet.
UBNT is trying to get into the Router market as well. Time will tell.
Steve Barnes
General Manager
PCS-WIN / RC-WiFihttp://www.rcwifi.com/
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Streakwave is supposedly shipping orders placed back when it was announced.
Mine hasn't arrived yet :-(
On Jan 8, 2013 12:57 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
That’s the new UBNT Edge Router line. I was not aware that they have
actually shipped to general public yet.
** **
I wouldn't touch one with a ten foot pole.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless smartphone
Jon Auer j...@tapodi.net wrote:
Streakwave is supposedly shipping orders placed back when it was announced.
Mine hasn't arrived yet :-(
On Jan 8, 2013 12:57 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
That’s the
That's an awfully bold statement. How come?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Christian Palecek christ...@cybernet1.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 4:30:22 PM
Subject: Re:
Why? Do you have one in service?
NGL
--
From: Christian Palecek christ...@cybernet1.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 2:30 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti ERLite-3 3-port Router
I wouldn't touch one
I have no reason to buy them at all. They're going to be less reliable
than Mikrotik (which is really really bad) and not be as good software
wise. Where does this device fit?
Their ad suggests it is to replace a Cisco. Ya right.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100
Why not? I've had very good success with mine so far. We've stopped buying
MikroTiks and will be phasing in ToughSwitches and EdgeRouters.
I need support. MT was good while there was no other competition.
On Jan 8, 2013, at 17:30, Christian Palecek christ...@cybernet1.com wrote:
I wouldn't
Please backup your statement. They are based on Yvatta which is very stable.
There is actually support for them - unlike MikroTik.
Software does everything a MikroTik does - maybe more since you can load your
own packages if you wish.
I've seen no issues with the ERs in our network.
On Jan
I was going to answer you guys...but you both boasted Ubiquiti support...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.comwrote:
Please backup your statement. They are based on
The software does not do everything that mikrotik's routerOS does.
Where is the MPLS support, something that many people use on routerOS?
On 09.01.2013 10:04, Matt Hoppes wrote:
Please backup your statement. They are based on Yvatta which is very
stable. There is actually support for them -
You are correct. No MPLS yet. But that is being worked on I'm sure. On the
other hand - if you really need MPLS shouldn't you be running a Cisco or a
Juniper?
On Jan 8, 2013, at 18:06, Andrew Jones a...@jonesy.com.au wrote:
The software does not do everything that mikrotik's routerOS does.
On the other hand - if you really need MPLS shouldn't you be running a
Cisco or a Juniper?
Why?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.comwrote:
On the other hand - if
I'm not so sure that MPLS support is being worked on. There is
certainly no commitment to it from Ubiquiti's forum reps and based on
the fact that there is no actively-maintained, feature-complete,
freely-available MPLS implementation for Linux, I'm not holding my
breath.
Why should I only
I'm sure you'll be making good use of that support.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless smartphone
Christian Palecek christ...@cybernet1.com wrote:
I wouldn't touch one with a ten foot pole.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless smartphone
Jon Auer j...@tapodi.net wrote:
Streakwave is supposedly shipping
On 1/8/2013 6:23 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
I'm not so sure that MPLS support is being worked on. There is
certainly no commitment to it from Ubiquiti's forum reps and based on
the fact that there is no actively-maintained, feature-complete,
freely-available MPLS implementation for Linux, I'm not
What is bandwidth shaping like on the EdgeRouter? I know it can be done
since it is debian under the hood, just wondering what the interface CLI
or GUI is like. I use to use a linux box for traffic shaping, but one
of the main reasons for switch to MT back in the day was the fact that
using
What about VLANing that traffic? As fat as the ER. If enough people want MPLS
they will add it. You can't say the same for MikroTik with their egotistic
mentality.
Have you ever tried to convince them there is a bug?
On Jan 8, 2013, at 18:46, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
On
Keep in mind that it's Vyatta's routing implementation, not UBNT's. I'd check
on their roadmap for MPLS.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 8, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com wrote:
What about VLANing that traffic? As fat as the ER. If enough people want
MPLS they will
Vyatta under the hood.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jan 8, 2013 6:55 PM, Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net wrote:
What is bandwidth shaping like on the EdgeRouter? I know it can be done
since it is debian under the hood, just
Which is debian under the hood. Haven't used vyatta though so I don't
know if there is a vyatta abstraction for tc or not, which is why I
asked the question of the interface for bandwidth limiting.
On 01/08/2013 06:15 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Vyatta under the hood.
Josh Luthman
Office:
On 1/8/2013 7:02 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
What about VLANing that traffic? As fat as the ER. If enough people want
MPLS they will add it. You can't say the same for MikroTik with their
egotistic mentality.
I totally get what you mean about MT. We've got some ROS boxes doing
good service,
Do you have anything to base that on?
I have both MT and UBNT devices that have been up without missing a beat since
they last had firmware upgraded 9+ months ago.
Now I know UBNT will have big shoes to fill if they plan on unseating Mikrotik,
but give them a couple years and I think they'll
I have had excellent support from UBNT, but maybe I'm special. o.O
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013
I believe the source project has no or minimal MPLS support.
Lack of MPLS is a deal killer for me, but I suspect they'll get it in there.
If you think EdgeOS is missing something, ask for it. The things I've asked for
(aside from MPLS), they've assured are present or are being developed.
Many are running MPLS just fine on Mikrotik.
One could also counter if you want a quality wireless network, why don't you
use Canopy or WiMAX\LTE?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoppes
I've been using both MT and UBNT for many many years and I plan to use them
both for many years. MT support has been almost completely absent, while UBNT
typically answers fairly quickly. That said, usually when I notice a problem
with my MT product, it's already been fixed in a newer release.
Build a Win ME machine. Put it on some batteries in the corner. Get your
9 mo uptime.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jan 8, 2013 8:56 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
Do you have anything to base that on?
I
Oh it's not just your perception. When MikroTik folks come to the ubiquiti
forums for support with MikroTik questions you know there is a problem.
On Jan 8, 2013, at 19:35, Jon Auer j...@tapodi.net wrote:
Having not touched one yet but knowing the hardware and software platform,
I'd be
Mikrotik had their MPLS implementation before the open source projects were out
(or had features available before them), so it is widely believed that they
developed it themselves.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From:
Bug? There is no bug. You're just using it wrong.
VLANs aren't acceptable in a large network and are much more difficult to
manage.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
To: WISPA
They either developed it in-house or licensed a 3rd party MPLS product.
ImageStream worked on and off for years trying to fill in the massive holes of
the open source version. Made progress, but never enough to release. I don't
think anyone has all 47 or so RFCs covered in a Linux
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net wrote:
I believe the source project has no or minimal MPLS support.
Lack of MPLS is a deal killer for me, but I suspect they'll get it in there.
There are some reasons to use Router OS MPLS
1) Main reason is VPLS, either
Wow, josh. Why are you so bitter towards these things? Many of us have had
them in heavy production without issue for months.
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 8, 2013, at 21:05, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Build a Win ME machine. Put it on some batteries in the corner. Get
I'm not bitter, I just don't see their advantage. You can't honestly
expect support to exceed that of Mikrotik. Features are better in
Mikrotik. Price doesn't have a huge gap between them.
Not exactly sure how you've had them running for months when they haven't
even started shipping. Unless
I'd like to know as well.
We have been using MT since 2.3.
Been using UBNT since the SR2 came out..
Each has their place.
--
On 1/8/2013 10:35 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
I'm not bitter, I just don't see their advantage.
39 matches
Mail list logo
