I used some 4in pipe for a mast (about 15ft). Welded studs and used J mounts. On
another one we used angle iron and grade 8 bolts to make a brace, welded studs
off the angle.
Scott Carullo wrote:
I will need to... can you share with me how it is configured inside?
Thinking about some UBNT
Routing or firewall setup issues. I pass a /24 and a /8 (NAT) across my entire
network. I use one place of NAT (well a few users still have in house NAT) I
would do traceroutes from and to the end IPs and see where things start to look
wrong.
RickG wrote:
OK, I've got a good one. I’m trying to
-30chat.net
jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
Routing or firewall setup issues. I pass a /24 and a /8 (NAT) across my
entire
network. I use one place of NAT (well a few users still have in house NAT)
I
would do traceroutes from and to the end IPs and see where things start to
look
wrong.
RickG wrote
SShhh, don't tell him that, hes a StarOS guy =)
Along the same, my primary site went down last night, cycling every
30~45seconds. -15F reported at the site this morning. RB433 is spec'd
for -4FW T F
Time to replace it with a few NS's and a RB450/750 in better temp controlled
case. To bad
series) I don't see Multicast
Rate, just Allow all
Yup the M's I have do not allow you to set a fixed rate. I should have been
clearer in that I meant that the AirMax stuff was different then the AirOS
stuff.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:20 PM, jree...@18-30chat.net
jree...@18-30chat.net wrote
You can change the multicast rate on the non airmax units. Mine are enroute so
have not tried with the airmax gear.
I have not heard back about the units.
At 130 ea, a Roku with the same features as the low end unit, will be more cost
effective. I am still researching about the licensing
we started doing this.
Before, when we were watching IPTV off our fiber headend, we were doing it
over EoIP.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:19 PM, jree...@18-30chat.net
jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
You can change the multicast rate on the non airmax units. Mine are enroute
so
have
-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of jree...@18-30chat.net
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mushroom Truffle BBNA
Understand that what they do is have a co-lo where they have lots and lots of BW
(one hopes). Then, tunnel out across the links at your end into the colo, and
bond the tunnels. You then look like their IP's to the world.
http://mushroomnetworks.com/product.aspx?product_id=1009
NGL wrote:
Has
I run everything client in as a router (no nat) and have a central nat server.
no pesky nat tables at the client end, or my end (MT, 1gb ram, 1.2ghz p3)
and never sees more then ~15% cpu. AP's run in bridged mode for that few extra
cycles, with a MT behind em.
Mark Stephenson wrote:
If the CPEs
That seams reasonable. Did I understand you correctly earlier in that you can
not talk about the license process due to NDA, or due to not being directly
involved? I will be contacting Avail Media and checking into their offerings.
Jayson Baker wrote:
We got OK to do it over MT equipment in
just takes money.
Usually when you want one channel from a content provider, they make you
offer them all.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: jree...@18-30chat.net
Sent: Sunday
The atheros driver contains the radio firmware. Thats part of what the 'driver'
is. The firmware is (in part) what decides if you can do 5/10/20/40 etc modes
and the driver is how you interface into those features.
Josh Luthman wrote:
Not to my knowledge. The only software you can change is
Well thats exactly what I had in mind. Its the licensing portion that is getting
me. Now, the requirement for enc to the STB, is not that big a deal, unless they
can mandate what type and such. I also know that some places are doing a IP feed
over there digital channel @19mbit (2sd 1 hd, iirc). In
That is why my target is to just qualify for being a CATV operator (and my
target spots are the same, less then 15 channels, all but one is OTA).
Using multicast, all say, 20 channels will head out, no extra use per TV and no
VoD. (for the wireless network). This also assumes its a dedicated
This is pretty easy to do. I had a small app I tried out a few years ago. It
would test a connection out and do a few link diagnostics. It also checked a
webserver and would display notices, etc, for reporting downtime, repair
schedules and what not. Overall, it was not much of a hit with people.
Oh my that is insane kw/h pricing. Happen to know what there buy back rates are?
Here I pay .07 kw/h with a buy back of .02 kw/h.
I have thought of doing time rates, but for now I turn down p2p, etc, during
peek times and kick it up at off peek. This worked well till the major push over
to
Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: jree...@18-30chat.net
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 8:44 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] IPTV -- Anyone doing it?
I have been looking at some IPTV options and basically
?
It is 'simple' to setup a IP feed.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.
--- Albert Einstein
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:50 PM, jree...@18-30chat.net
jree...@18-30chat.net
I have been looking at some IPTV options and basically, there does not seam to
be a whole lot of options. I can A) build my own IP headend B) nada . I can not
find a single IPTV provider that truly caters to the resident, soho, etc. There
is one that does so for huge cable op's but thats not
feeds from their
super-headend (aggregator).
They work with the networks and it makes licensing and such a little easier.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:44 AM, jree...@18-30chat.net jree...@18-30chat.net
wrote:
I have been looking at some IPTV options and basically, there does not seam
NetFlix has a dynamic codec and bandwidth sensor. I have a few customers that
stream. They all have asked why it starts out nice and slowly starts to look
worse. I explain that they start out at 10mbit and lose X% bandwidth over Y Time
till they are at the 2mb account they have paid for. One
to.
What I have looked into with them is they have a may not cross public right of
way clause making is useless for anything except MDU's, or is that only with
dish network label setups? Will check it out.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:16 AM, jree...@18-30chat.net jree...@18-30chat.net
wrote
I agree and disagree with you. NAT is good and works well for most home users. I
have issues with consoles and NAT, wherein I have many users who want to game
together, and xbox doesn't let that happen nicely. I hand out 1 public to those
who need it, more for those who want to pay. As for network
Was that the best the link would do before the wind? It might seam odd, but have
you tried cross pol at one end? Ive got a dish here, the bunp on the feed is
180* off from the specs, made for lots of fun. No no, the paper says this is
right, it just isn't lined up half hour later sure, lets flip
you will need to use WDS to make a true bridge. Works fine. I would go with a
5ghz radio, if for no other reason then that 99% of 'war drivers' are using 2ghz
radios. You could drop to 5mhz channels and get away from that for a while but
5/10 mhz channels are coming to war drivers. Next reason
Yea but what does it mean for us? Everything I have seen makes this look like
the FCC is only interested in the cell carriers. Maybe a trade can be done, some
existing cellular spectrum is given over in exchange for the new spectrum? Id
kill to have some cellular spectrum.
I talked to US Cellular once about 5 years ago. IIRC their fee was $2000 +
$750/antenna and you have to rent ground space from the land owner ($1800/mo)
for 10x10.
Cameron Kilton wrote:
I was interested in a Verizon Wireless tower, than they tell me there is
a non-refundable $2500 application
How is that legal!? And does apply to all antennas or to towers? And how do they
define a tower?
plants face on desk
Tim Sylvester wrote:
In Santa Cruz County California, it can cost $25K to go through the
permitting process to install an antenna. The County charges $6,000 for a
use permit
Our kids should get together. Liam (6) and Grayson (3) both 'give the world
internet' with various toys (talkie talkies). Its bad mojo to leave a radio/poe
on the table with them around. They learned what magic smoke is and why its bad
to let it out (RB133C + StarOS POE) =\
D. Ryan Spott
and terrain are you
dealing with?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of jree...@18-30chat.net
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Micropops
My entire network is pretty
Thats the point of the mpops. There are few places where I can not find some
part of my network (or some other open wireless). I carry a PS2 and a
bullet5 with 19db panel. Inverter in the van, spare battery + 200ft 10/3 cord,
10ft pole + tripod + cinder blocks. I can run down the block and drop a
inline
Mark Nash wrote:
I'd like to hear opinions on what Micropops do to your business.
1. How many customers do you look for before you install even the least
expensive MPoP?
1
I can not think of a single person (on my net) that does not have a laptop. They
need a AP so you mighht as
Depends on what you want to do with the cable, condition of the cable, etc. I
did some tests with coaxial ethernet and were very impressed. Now only I could
have got the local plants that went down for some larger scale testing.
sa...@michianawireless.com wrote:
Ok here is the current situation.
verify on your AP that those features are actually functioning?
Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: jree...@18-30chat.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Mmmm. My Bullet 5's have ff/comp settings. I wonder if that is a mistake?
Mark Nash wrote:
According to Ubiquiti, these DO support ff comp:
Nanostation 5
Nanostation Loco 5
Bullet 2 HP
Picostation 2 HP
All powerstations
All others do not, including:
Nanostation 2
Nanostation Loco
The real shame here is that is has nothing to do with cyber-security. There is
no inbound service attack that is not better dealt with by shutting off the
attacked network then by turning off everyone else. Don't forget its dirt simple
to go X failed Y times, block traffic from X for Z hours with
OUCH! Now that is a high failure rate.
Not a big deal as its the one, but very annoying issue when it first came up.
The ping watchdog was on the #2 port. The weather was good so I am really
thinking/hope its spiders. If not oh well, its the only non obvious board
failure in 5 years. The rest
Will they cover damage caused by power issues? I can not see them doing it.
As far as I have been able to find, no, the caps/plugs are not sold.
RickG wrote:
Since they've only been out since December, I'd assume all Bullets are
still under manufacturers warranty?
But, while on the
Anyone have some dead bullets they will sell? I am in need or 2 or 3 (mainly the
end caps)
Jeromie
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
My bad, I thought I had Ubnt in the topic. Ubiquiti Bullets, need 2 end caps and
extra seal, or 3 end caps.
Jeromie
Josh Luthman wrote:
We talking copper or Ubiquiti..?
On 6/26/09, jree...@18-30chat.net jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
Anyone have some dead bullets they will sell? I am in need
Are the bullets in WDS mode, if not you will have proxy ARP for one direction
and not the other. This will really mess with routing/link protocols.
Fire up wireshark and post a short capture (starting before adding the links to
right after adding them).
If you add just one link or the other,
A RB450 should work well. You can load linux onto them if you have some special
requirement or application (if so check that it will compile on mips setup).
Patrick D.. Nix, Jr wrote:
Any suggestions on a good linux firewall distro. I'm looking at either
implementing this or going with an
Maybe if people did not use Outbreak Express and Internet Exploiter it would not
be such a problem.
Charles Wyble wrote:
Ah. I've been seeing a lot of those. I knew they were malware or some
other nonsense.
Thanks for sharing.
Bleh e-mail is going to die off soon, or usage models of
would be
targeting Firefox :)
On 6/23/09, jree...@18-30chat.net jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
Maybe if people did not use Outbreak Express and Internet Exploiter it would
not
be such a problem.
Charles Wyble wrote:
Ah. I've been seeing a lot of those. I knew they were malware or some
St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:23 PM, jree...@18-30chat.net
jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
I agree. And we would still see a drastic
As much as I love Mikrotik they do not have Snort. It is a very valuable tool.
That said, you can do like i do and run Snort on a dedicated ethernet port on
one of your existing servers and mirror everything to it. That combined with
MT's firewall abilities is great. I have been working on dynamic
Yes that will work. I am not sure if the link layer fault detect will
work correctly so you might need to run Spanning Tree also. Something
that can be a issue is if say you have 4 links and one is running 24mbit
modulation and the rest are 54, your going to have issues with the slow
link. If
I sell (and use) HP PSC printers. The white with light grey, not the
dark gray ones (I do not knwo why the dark ones are such POS's). Never
touch a Lexmark (or Dell Home/SOHO AIO series, same brand). Lately I
have been pushing the Brother HL-2170W. Fast PPS with inexpensive
refills. BW only (they
What do you mean lack of? There is a client list,
Station MAC Signal, dBm Noise, dBm Tx Rate Rx Rate
Idle (sec)
00:16:xx:xx:xx:xx-62-9636M54M15
00:18:xx:xx:xx:xx-69-9636M1M15
and per station info, scan mode (in client and ap
It makes a great CPE drop in replacement. It also works well if you use
12v POE switch's, hard to find reasonably priced ones tho.
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
I'm still up in the air about the bullet. By the time you add antenna
and power supply, the cost goes up. But then again, most of us
If you deploy a fiber only network, or a coaxial only network (100% IP)
are you forced into being a common carrier? The way way I read it, no
you do not. The way a partner reads it, Yes, you do/can be. I know many
people here have talked about doing/have done fiber/coax deployments.
Where did
A 6yo and 3yo (both in may) can do a box of 2000 in about the same
amount of time. The things they do with tools in less time is truly
scary.
Daddy we fixed the door!
Uhm, what was wrong with it?
Our keys don't fit it now
Yes, you do not have any keys for the door
No, Grayson put glue in it
Are you looking to put a ethernet port in each room, or total wifi
coverage, or both? Zhone and VDSL primarily are geared for
ethernet in each room. Its pretty easy to do a total wifi coverage. I
have used a mix of HomePlug and HPNA to reach key points
for AP placement. Each site is different and
I would upgrade your AV before tossing AngryIP out. =-)
Give the windows port of nmap a go.
Steve Barnes wrote:
We have used angry IPSCANNER for years around the office for years to do odds
and ends IP scans. Norton Anti-everything hates it and the new 2009 version
wont let me exclude it.
In addition to unlocking it, you flash it to recover locked features. If
you have a free and clear phone its easy enough
to get them unlocked. Flashing a phone can be a pain, mostly in finding
a flash that is not also locked or that has the
features that you want. Most phone manufactures are not
I got rid of my full sized 96 GMC Suburban (7~13mpg) and got me a 05
Dodge Caravan (19~30mpg).
It handles a 35ft extension ladder + a boot of gear = )
Josh Luthman wrote:
What does everyone use for a service vehicle? We have an 1999 f250
that is at the end of it's road. It has the
PT Cruiser?!! I shudder. I would go for another Caravan. The only
thing I wish mine had
was 4wd. I am likely getting a S10 blazer for the rough work.
rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
We use an old Dodge Caravan. These have drip rails on them to fasten
standard ladder racks to, and carry
They are the host company for SkyNet, you have found a advanced node.
2953 Bunker Hill Lane
Suite 400
Santa Clara CA 95054
www.advancedcybernetics.com
(The building looks like the same from the movie too)
Jason wrote:
Anyone know who they are and what they make? I saw a MAC id pop up in a
Using Google hosted email is ok, but, has some drawbacks. Namely the SSL
cert and funky IMAP support. If it could be better integrated into a
website (IE, into my.foo.com instead of google.com/a/my.foo.com) I would
love it. Maybe that can be done with a better understanding of the
Google API?
When I do this we would make a 2x2 frame with plywood on each side and
pre-drill the holes. This would sit over the concrete form
with the J's bolted in place.
lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
I agree... Total PITA lining up rod. We use sleeve anchors or threaded rod
and Hilti epoxy.
Sent from
61 matches
Mail list logo
