I spent some time reading the latest R & O about the 3650 spectrum, which is
dated back in 2005.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-56A1.pdf
I am, however, unable to understand what the present status is. Does anyone
have that information? What's going on...or not goin
c
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "wispa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 4:29 AM
Subject: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
I spent some time reading the latest R & O abou
That's an age old question.
Anyone have any ideas what's up with it?
-
Jeff
On 3/2/07 1:29 AM, "wispa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I spent some time reading the latest R & O about the 3650 spectrum, which is
> dated back in 2005.
>
> http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-0
ly"
certification, we're going back to the "must buy only the big boy's
solutions" which...may never exist, as you say.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
> - Original Message -
> From: &quo
TED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:30:38 -0500, Tom DeReggi wrote
3650 is complicated. Last month's FCC visit stated that they are
getting close, and expect answe
m: "wispa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:30:38 -0500, Tom DeReggi wrote
3650 is complicated. Last month's FCC visit stated that
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 23:51:00 -0600, John Scrivner wrote
If that's Twomey's word, then that's better than giving Bullit 200 bucks, or
whatever the price of his "manual" is.
I merely wanted to see what backhauls worked like in the absense of noise,
but I did want to load them with real life traf
You might want to ask him.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message - From: "wispa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what&#x
; Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "wispa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
>
>
>
I heard back from a Ubiquiti salesperson yesterday (working Sunday!),
they expect to start shipping the XR3 cards this month.
http://www.ubnt.com/xtreme_range3.php4
I guess they are claiming that 802.11 is the "contention protocol".
I might check out a pair, we'll see how they are priced. Aft
28
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Valenti
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:03 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
I heard back from a
So what your saying Patrick is,
It's ok, we should go and buy some of these things and do some testing,
right?
:)
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
3650, ok, so what's current status?
So what your saying Patrick is,
It's ok, we should go and buy some of these things and do some testing,
right?
:)
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
***
What is STA?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 2:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
You are trying to wind me up aren't
] On
Behalf Of Mark McElvy
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:19 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
What is STA?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, March 05,
243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
Special Temporary Authority.
These are tempo
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 2:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
You are trying to wind me up aren't you George? :)
Speaking to the co
Patrick Leary wrote:
You are trying to wind me up aren't you George? :)
:)
Well maybe a bit, but some of us have our 3650 aps in.
Just figuring your a wealth of information and I knew you would expand
upon this.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http
PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
If I remember correctly (and I hope anyone will jump in here with any
necessary corrections to the following) it's a "Special Temporary
Authorization". In the "Experimental Radio Service&qu
on, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 1:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status
onage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 1:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
If your STA is not for this purpose, its leg
: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
Subpart D, Operating Requirements, General Limitations 5.151:
(1) Stations may make only such transmissions as are necessary and
directly related to the conduct of the licensee's stated program of
experimentation as
Hi John,
The Ubiquitu XR3 spec sheet is misleading. As far as I know, there is no
current legal license-free 3650 operation allowed, as Ubiquity states.
Operation on 3650 can only take place when a Special Temporary
Authorization aplication has been submitted to the FCC and an STA
approval re
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:45 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
So what your saying Patrick is,
It's ok, we should go and buy some of these things and do some testing,
right?
:)
WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 3:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what'
Jack & Patrick: thanks for all the info on 3650 status.
This type of response is why I'm on this mailing list.
That March 10, 2005 announcement is near-and-dear to me, since that
is what started me on the WISP path. I haven't closely followed the
progress on 3650, so when I saw the XR3 info
Part-15 org people selling a "help get licensed on 3650 manual" -- their
webpage doesn't indicate to me that it is still experimental.
http://www.part-15.org/sales/3650manual.asp
Catch this from that page:
Training Manual
Have you looked into using 3650MHz for the security of Interfere
John,
To learn the propagation characteristics of 3.x GHz gear, testing in the
3300-3500 MHz ham band is clearly the best way to go. Personal
experimentation ("advancing the radio art") and performing public
service were (and are) the reason that the amateur radio service exists.
Of course, w
D]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
Hi John,
The Ubiquitu XR3 spec sheet is misleading. As far as I know, there is no
current legal license-free 3650 operation allowed, as Ubiquity states.
O
There is more than one reason that many of us are here instead of there.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what'
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 3:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
Patrick Leary wrote:
You are trying to wind me up aren't you George? :)
D
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:40:33 -0500, John Valenti wrote
> Jack & Patrick: thanks for all the info on 3650 status.
>
> This type of response is why I'm on this mailing list.
>
> That March 10, 2005 announcement is near-and-dear to me, since that
> is what started me on the WISP path. I haven't clo
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 3650, ok, so what's current status?
You are trying to wind me up aren't you George? :)
Speaking to the community at large:
The goo
33 matches
Mail list logo
