Re: [WISPA] 5 Ghz - Avoiding RADAR

2007-06-28 Thread Ryan Langseth
On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 11:16 -0500, David E. Smith wrote: > Ryan Langseth wrote: > > We recently deployed a link close to a Air Force Base. The link is a > > 5GHz (802.11a), while it supports DFS, I would like to avoid having > > the link going to sleep for obvious reasons, from what I have

Re: [WISPA] 5 Ghz - Avoiding RADAR

2007-06-28 Thread David E. Smith
Ryan Langseth wrote: > We recently deployed a link close to a Air Force Base. The link is a > 5GHz (802.11a), while it supports DFS, I would like to avoid having > the link going to sleep for obvious reasons, from what I have read > the 5.8 range does not need to support DFS, is this corr

Re: [WISPA] 5 Ghz - Avoiding RADAR

2007-06-28 Thread Mike Hammett
AFAIK, under 5.725 GHz - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Ryan Langseth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:59 AM Subject: [WISPA] 5 Ghz - Avoidi

[WISPA] 5 Ghz - Avoiding RADAR

2007-06-28 Thread Ryan Langseth
Resending, not sure if it made it out. We recently deployed a link close to a Air Force Base. The link is a 5GHz (802.11a), while it supports DFS, I would like to avoid having the link going to sleep for obvious reasons, from what I have read the 5.8 range does not need to support DFS, i