o:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Bret Clark
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:54 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?
>
> I somewhat disagree, in terms of the signal, no you don't need approval,
> but to put a wireless network
So far it all sounds good. Thanks! This one might be the winner.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a
I have a 5.8 link over an airport and a 900ap next door to the airport. No
problems.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur
Agreed. Planes flying through the Fresnel zone will have more of an
impact on B type modulation than on say G. You might see selective
fading because of multipath, but OFDM or some other robust modulation
technique will recover from an aircraft on approach at 250 mph flying
through the Fresne
-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of lakel...@gbcx.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?
Won't be a problem. Planes will not cause you an issue unless they fly into
the tower.
I have a link accross a runway at 5Ghz and jets pass throug
ssage-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:35 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?
Unless the base of the runway is in the Fresnel zone... an airplane flying
t
ginal Message-
From: "Robert West"
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:22:40
To: ; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?
This path I'm considering is 33 miles in length and the airport is 11 miles
from the closest tower. Both towers are existing structu
s-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Robert West
>Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:23 AM
>To: bcl...@spectraaccess.com; 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?
>
>This path I'm considering is 33 miles in le
over
there.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bret Clark
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:54 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?
I somewhat disagree, in terms of the signal, no you
every day for a WISP system. :-)
Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Bret Clark
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:54:22
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?
I somewhat disagree, in terms of the signal, no you don't need ap
rap shoot and depends what band you
> are on and what is colocated at the airport.
>
> Bob
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Clark
>
> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:55:46
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [
t: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?
We shoot across an airport (the big ones as well) with a bunch of 5.8
stuff, but I believe we needed to get clearance from the airport and
maybe the FAA before installing. Otherwise we've had zero problems with
interference from their systems. I would start
We shoot across an airport (the big ones as well) with a bunch of 5.8
stuff, but I believe we needed to get clearance from the airport and
maybe the FAA before installing. Otherwise we've had zero problems with
interference from their systems. I would start by calling or gong to see
the person
Looking at a possible path but we would run right down the runway of an
airport. Not small planes, the big ones! Towers are 300' on both
ends.. I don't see any issues here but have no idea what to expect
from the RF over that thing. They are fully automated with all the latest
in radio
14 matches
Mail list logo
