I have a BulletM2 and a NanostationM5 back to back (the bullet's ethernet port
is connected to the NanostationM5's secondary port. The NanostationM5 is
doing POE pass through and powering the BulletM2. The NanostationM5 the
BulletM2 is connected to is the far end of a pair of NanostationM5's
They are linux based.
Use ethtool interface
Regards
Michael Baird
I have a BulletM2 and a NanostationM5 back to back (the bullet's ethernet
port is connected to the NanostationM5's secondary port. The NanostationM5
is doing POE pass through and powering the BulletM2. The NanostationM5 the
Just guessing, but could they require a crossover cable when both are
forced? According to Wikipedia Auto-MDIX requires the speed and
duplex setting to be set to auto.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-MDIX
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a
Thanks! I'll check it.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
They are linux based.
Use ethtool interface
Regards
Michael Baird
I have a BulletM2 and a NanostationM5 back to back (the bullet's ethernet
port is connected to the NanostationM5's secondary port. The
Great idea. I'll try that.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
Just guessing, but could they require a crossover cable when both are
forced? According to Wikipedia Auto-MDIX requires the speed and
duplex setting to be set to auto.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-MDIX
I read a bit about ethtool and then gave it a shot but this was all I got. I
iterated through eth0 through eth12 and got nothing.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
Cannot get device settings: No such device
Cannot get wake-on-lan settings: No such device
Cannot get message level: No such
Try ifconfig first, Ubiquiti doesn't call their interfaces eth0 and
eth1, they call them eth0_real and eth1_real.
Regards
Michael Baird
I read a bit about ethtool and then gave it a shot but this was all I got. I
iterated through eth0 through eth12 and got nothing.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0
Thanks! That worked.
ifconfig got me:
XM.v5.2# ifconfig
ath0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:6D:F0:1C:0E
UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC ALLMULTI MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:252008 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:249081 errors:0
I started using ethtool and backing up through the chain of gear back to the
router. At one box I'm getting this. Instead of a speed it's saying
Unknown!(0). and it's only negotiated half duplex.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0_real
Settings for eth0_real:
Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
Sounds like you found the issue.
Regards
Michael Baird
I started using ethtool and backing up through the chain of gear back to the
router. At one box I'm getting this. Instead of a speed it's saying
Unknown!(0). and it's only negotiated half duplex.
XM.v5.2# ethtool eth0_real
Settings
Yeah. Thanks!
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
Sounds like you found the issue.
Regards
Michael Baird
I started using ethtool and backing up through the chain of gear back to the
router. At one box I'm getting this. Instead of a speed it's saying
Unknown!(0). and
Actually no. Turns out that's the port that has nothing else but the POE
injector connected. The search goes on.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
Sounds like you found the issue.
Regards
Michael Baird
I started using ethtool and backing up through the chain of gear
Did a crossover cable fix it?
http://ubnt.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18882
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually no. Turns out that's the port that has nothing else but the POE
injector connected. The search goes on.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 4:27
Interesting - My NSM5 shows connected @ 100Mbps/Full but my DLink
router shows it @ 100Mbps/Half. It is set for Full/Auto. Running 5.2.
Thoughts?
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Michael Baird m...@tc3net.com wrote:
Try ifconfig first, Ubiquiti doesn't call their interfaces eth0 and
eth1, they
I'm going to try that when I find one. I have one here somewhere but haven't
found it yet. I could make one but I don't have many RJ45s and since I'm in the
jungle I don't want to blow them on something that's not a necessity. I do
believe if I had the cross over cable then I could force the
I just did some tests with my setup (radio, router, laptop). It ONLY
likes the port set to AUTO. Anything else causes it to disconnect or
act flaky. You might still need the crossover though as I didnt test
between 2 radios. Of course you could use a switch if no crossover is
available.
On Sat,
If need be, since you have low supply of connectors, if you have any bad
patch cables, cut, cross the tx/rx and splice it just to test. Any true
wire geek never throws bad patch away.
:)
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Good idea! I have some cables with the connector tab broken. I'll hack one
tomorrow and see what happens.
Greg
On Jun 5, 2010, at 7:34 PM, Robert West wrote:
If need be, since you have low supply of connectors, if you have any bad
patch cables, cut, cross the tx/rx and splice it just to
18 matches
Mail list logo
