On 12/18/2010 08:45 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
917 and 922 same results.
Nothing else on 900, except another one of our towers. No confict.
Noise floor high 90s or better.
Yeah, I wondered about a 900MHz phone, but it works during the day
and not an night.
try the two lower channels. what
I have a new customer that is giving us fits.
AP and CPE are both RouterOS with SR9.
11 Clients on the AP, this is the only one with problems.
I checked it several times today and it was running signal strength -65
both ways and CCQ was always above 90, often saw 100. Customer said the
On 12/18/2010 06:28 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
I have a new customer that is giving us fits.
AP and CPE are both RouterOS with SR9.
11 Clients on the AP, this is the only one with problems.
I checked it several times today and it was running signal strength -65
both ways and CCQ was always above
Ping across, see if it works all the time.
See where the issue is first.
On Dec 18, 2010 6:28 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
I have a new customer that is giving us fits.
AP and CPE are both RouterOS with SR9.
11 Clients on the AP, this is the only one with problems.
I checked it
Josh hit the nail on the head...
See what else in going on @ the CPE.
Also -
have you folks started using MTR instead of ping?
MTR is like a traceroute on steroids
In short - it combines the functionality of the traceroute tool and ping
application together :-)
It shows you packet loss
917 and 922 same results.
Nothing else on 900, except another one of our towers. No confict.
Noise floor high 90s or better.
Yeah, I wondered about a 900MHz phone, but it works during the day and
not an night.
On 12/18/2010 6:35 PM, Leon D. Zetekoff wrote:
On 12/18/2010 06:28 PM, Scott Reed
I see the association go away not matter what else is going on.
On 12/18/2010 6:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Ping across, see if it works all the time.
See where the issue is first.
On Dec 18, 2010 6:28 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net
mailto:sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
I have a new customer
I have used that, but not here.
It is not an IP issue, the radios drop association due to excessive
errors, per the CPE. I have never seen the AP drop the link in the log.
On 12/18/2010 7:57 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
Josh hit the nail on the head...
See what else in going on @ the CPE.
Also -
Make sure the client radio is getting enough voltage? I have seen
similar things happen that were fixed with a higher voltage/amperage
power supply. Does this install have a long cable run or anything
different than the others that might affect the input power?
--John
On 12/18/2010 7:46 PM,
My first guess would be local noise on the CPE end. Second would be a
hardware issue.
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 7:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Flaky connection
I have xr9 cards that just suddenly keep dropping. Replacing them
seems to fix it.
One way to tell... force the card to use only the lowest modulation
level for Tx. If card then stays associated, then very likely card
bad...
This works on the xr9... Not
Have you tried changing the hardware retries for the client?
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
I see the association go away not matter what else is going on.
On 12/18/2010 6:36 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Ping across, see if it works all the time.
See where
I can certainly give them a different power supply. We use PACWireless
24 volt supplies almost exclusively and this is the only one with an
issue, but could be bad power. Cable is only about 30'. The only other
thing that may be different is installer did this one when it was about
10*.
Second RB and SR9, same symptoms. I will try the modulation rates when
it comes back stable or I can get to the customer site.
On 12/18/2010 8:58 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
I have xr9 cards that just suddenly keep dropping. Replacing them
seems to fix it.
One way to tell... force the card to
No. That is a good idea. I will try that when I can get into the
client again.
On 12/18/2010 9:34 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
Have you tried changing the hardware retries for the client?
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Scott Reedsr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
I see the association go away not matter
Havent tried that. I've used pathping. Are they simular?
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
Josh hit the nail on the head...
See what else in going on @ the CPE.
Also -
have you folks started using MTR instead of ping?
MTR is like a traceroute on
16 matches
Mail list logo
