We have a tower with a single radio operating on it. We were using a
Microtik 133 board with a single Prizim chipset in it. One day it
stopped responding to requests through the network using Winbox. No
customers were down so we assumed it was running bandwidth (too much
snow to travel up there)
MikroTik :)
So the only change you made between the hut and up on the tower is
changing what the other end of the poe was and the line up the tower.
This means your switch, poe, or the lines have gone bad.
I'd replace the poe and patch cable first (and the switch if that is
what it is in). If th
ent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 5:14 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Microtik Remote Weirdness
>
> MikroTik :)
>
> So the only change you made between the hut and up on the tower is
> changing what the other end of the poe was and the line up the tower.
> This
* Forbes Mercy wrote, On 1/20/2009 7:00 PM:
>
>
> Took a back-up 433AH board up and used the same radio card, worked like
> a charm for both our access and customer throughput. We didn't want to
> waste a three port/LAN board so ordered a 433a single port board. Once
> it arrived we logged into
nt to crank it
to 10M/FULL and see if that helps.
We can try this.
Forbes
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mic
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Microtik Remote Weirdness
* Forbes Mercy wrote, On 1/20/2009 7:00 PM:
>
>
> Took a back-up 433AH board up and used the same radio card, worked
like
> a charm for both our access and customer throughput. We didn't want
to
> waste a thr
;s actually a 411a.
> The board that is working is the 433ah.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:21 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subj
Could it be that the board is getting to low a voltage?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 20, 2009, at 7:00 PM, "Forbes Mercy" wrote:
> We have a tower with a single radio operating on it. We were using a
> Microtik 133 board with a single Prizim chipset in it. One day it
> stopped responding to r
ct myself I've been saying 433a, it's actually a 411a.
>> The board that is working is the 433ah.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
>> Sent: Tuesday,
gt;> On 1/20/09, Forbes Mercy wrote:
>>
>>> Oops let me correct myself I've been saying 433a, it's actually a 411a.
>>> The board that is working is the 433ah.
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto
NCE
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:21 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Microtik Remote Weirdness
>
> * Forbes Mercy wrote, On 1/20/2009 7:00 PM:
>
>>
>>
>> Took a back-up 433AH board up and used the same radio card, worked
>>
&g
Hi Forbes,
good news and bad news. Let me start with the good news.
You are not alone!
The bad news is the same of the good news, lately, we are having a lot
of problems on the ethernet. It looks like the ethernet port has a lower
speed (like 200Kbps) or that you cannot even log in it. Does it s
Moreover, I suspect the overall quality of Mikrotik hardware is not very
good and it's getting even worse.
>>To begin with they're not the best by they are far from "not very good" in
my opinion. As far as progression, though, they have majorly improved. The
RB4xx series is BY FAR superior to t
t via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Josh Luthman
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:19:48
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Microtik Remote Weirdness
Moreover, I suspect the overall quality of Mikrotik hardware is not very
good and it's getting even worse.
>&
managed to get price down I'm surprised its not
> more/higher.
>
> /Eje
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Luthman
>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:19:48
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Microtik Re
Hi Josh,
to be honest the 4xx are giving us problems. We have a lot of boards
with "strange behaviors", I have a desk full of "suspected of...,
probably does not do ".
I cannot tell you if the 5xx (e.g. 532) series were worse. We still have
some 532/532A installed with 2.9.x and they work great,
The 333 board sucked. That simple.
I have dozens of customers with RB411 CPEs and our power is pretty good -
never had to reboot the CPE for the last 6 months (we started deploying them
6 months ago). The 133 did have that power problem and I saw it many times,
however, a $50 UPS can fix that.
how they grown and managed to get price down I'm surprised its not
more/higher.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Josh Luthman
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:19:48
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Microtik Remote Weirdness
Moreover, I suspec
You are not alone!
I've use a 48VDC to 15VDC converter in my boxes. All my tower gear is
48VDC and staying that way.
Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
Another thing is that I still don't understand why the power supply is
not 48VDC as most of the telco world. It would have simplified many
things
What 48V to 15 V converters do you use?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Blair Davis
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Microtik Remote Weirdness
20 matches
Mail list logo
