RE: [WISPA] No, Patrick, it's not about the stickers...

2007-02-19 Thread wispa
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:35:37 -0800, Patrick Leary wrote > ..."But if you wish to become an advocate for this industry,..." > > LOL, but for better of for worse Mark, that happened a long time ago. > > As for the FCC protecting Alvarion's interests. Don't make me choke with > laughter. The FCC cou

Re: [WISPA] No, Patrick, it's not about the stickers...

2007-02-19 Thread Sam Tetherow
Rick Smith wrote: This could be the same path as the arguments for and against Open Source are taking these days. In the end, Open Source is winning... However, I see a "bad apples" component to Mark's argument. If the rules are to allow us to mix / match any individually certified components i

RE: [WISPA] No, Patrick, it's not about the stickers...

2007-02-19 Thread Rick Smith
e certification process works, but wouldn't it be interesting to get all these "open source" pieces certified by the FCC, and then put it to bed ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wispa Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 11:55 PM To: WI

RE: [WISPA] No, Patrick, it's not about the stickers...

2007-02-18 Thread Patrick Leary
unday, February 18, 2007 8:55 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] No, Patrick, it's not about the stickers... On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:32:42 -0800, Patrick Leary wrote > "Sticker conscious?" So this is what we've become as an industry? > Following the very clear laws, whic

[WISPA] No, Patrick, it's not about the stickers...

2007-02-18 Thread wispa
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:32:42 -0800, Patrick Leary wrote > "Sticker conscious?" So this is what we've become as an industry? > Following the very clear laws, which were once again just reiterated > to us after another in a long chain of WISP visits, or not has now been > reduced to simply being "st