That would be cool!
marlon
-Original Message-
From: wi...@metrocom.ca
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 4:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
I have them at the office, so I can send them when I am back, but I have a
better idea. I am getting a
vices to people sooner than later, just
> > have
> > to stay in business long enough to let the technologies catch up to what
> > the markets
> > are really asking for.
> >
> > marlon
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Joe Miller
> > Sent:
tc.
> We’ll be able to deliver these services to people sooner than later, just
> have
> to stay in business long enough to let the technologies catch up to what
> the markets
> are really asking for.
>
> marlon
>
>
>
> From: Joe Miller
> Sent: Thursday, Sep
,
marlon
From: Fred Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:55 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
On 9/25/2013 1:00 PM, heith petersen wrote:
I just got off the phone with a customer. I made some adjustments to his SM
the other day to
ervices to people sooner than later, just have
> to stay in business long enough to let the technologies catch up to what the
> markets
> are really asking for.
>
> marlon
>
>
>
> From: Joe Miller
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 8:18 AM
> To: 'WISPA General
long enough to let the technologies catch up to
what the markets are really asking for.
marlon
From: Joe Miller
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 8:18 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
Joe,
I do agree that usage based billing is the way to g
.
laters,
marlon
*From:* Fred Goldstein <mailto:fgoldst...@ionary.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:55 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
On 9/25/2013 1:00 PM, heith petersen wrote:
I just got off the phone wit
the customer base where it’s at
for an unknown length of time.
laters,
marlon
From: Fred Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 2:55 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
On 9/25/2013 1:00 PM, heith petersen wrote:
I just got off the phone with a
pill to swallow.
>
>
>
>I think that this is a good discussion for a session in Vegas.
>
>
>
>We have hundreds of companies that are members of WISPA, and I think
>with
>enough minds on this that we can come up with a good solution for
>everyone.
>
>
>
&
.com/dslbyair
>
>228-831-8881
>
>
>
>From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Joe Fiero
>Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:17 AM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
>
>
>
>
...@dslbyair.com ; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
Joe,
I too built up on an open usage platform and yes, when the subscribers logged
into their PowerCode portals and viewed usage charts I got plenty of calls. We
have not yet implemented metered billing b
WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
Joe,
I do agree that usage based billing is the way to go. However, when our
system was originally built 10 years ago, it was done so on the unlimited
platform. The customers that we have I believe will respond in a negative
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of heith petersen
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
Fred,
thanks for the in-depth answer. Fortunately for me I have 5 different
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of heith petersen
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
Fred,
thanks for the in-depth answer. Fortunately for me I have 5 different markets
or areas I serve. Once we get a
ryone.
>
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,
>
> ** **
>
> Joe Miller
>
> www.dslbyair.com
>
> www.facebook.com/dslbyair
>
> 228-831-8881
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
&g
ubject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
I believe Fred to be correct. Packages based on speed are not the answer.
We call our connection a pipe, so lets use a related analogy;
You can have two homes with water service. One is an older home that has a
½ inch water main, the other is new co
in a
once-thought untouchable market.
Joe
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:55 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
On 9/25/2013 1:00 PM, heith
] packaging suggestions
On 9/25/2013 1:00 PM, heith petersen wrote:
I just got off the phone with a customer. I made some adjustments to his SM
the other day to make netflix work. He called back today to tell me it works
good but his direct tv showtime package is OK but not great. I kind of wanted
We moved to this model years ago.
50G per month, up to 10Mb/s burst,1am to 7am doesn't count against cap,
drop to 256K/128K when you reach the cap, no contract
Very few complaints.
If they want streaming, we sell them a CIR at whatever speed they want.
$200 for 2M, $350 for 4M and so on. C
On 9/25/2013 1:00 PM, heith petersen wrote:
I just got off the phone with a customer. I made some adjustments to
his SM the other day to make netflix work. He called back today to
tell me it works good but his direct tv showtime package is OK but not
great. I kind of wanted to ask him what the
Joe,
in the small print, you have the optional service maintenance agreement. What
does that entail for your customers?
thanks
heith
mnw
From: Joe Miller
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:16 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] packaging suggestions
Here is what w
I just got off the phone with a customer. I made some adjustments to his SM the
other day to make netflix work. He called back today to tell me it works good
but his direct tv showtime package is OK but not great. I kind of wanted to ask
him what the hell gives dish net the right to sell you a s
22 matches
Mail list logo
