Do you HAVE to have the Ethernet POE? I use them (have one in my hand now) but
if I have local power I use the much cheaper AIR-PWR-B= They are about 8 bucks
all over the place.
The 3 ways I power a 1602:
POE Switch
Plug in power supply that connects to AP AIR-PWR-B=
True POE
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco POE
Do you HAVE to have the Ethernet POE? I use them (have one in my hand now) but
if I have local power I use the much cheaper AIR-PWR-B= They are about 8 bucks
all over the place.
The 3 ways I power a 1602:
POE Switch
Plug in power supply that connects to AP
Is he actually authenticating from a radius server or is he just
authenticating from the MAC access list?
Andy Trimmell wrote:
We have a non profit trying to use one of these routers for their
connection. Previously they have a residential Netgear router that
worked fine and still does.
Sounds like pppoe on your network? What pppoe concentrater are you using?
On 1/19/11, Andy Trimmell atrimm...@precisionds.com wrote:
We have a non profit trying to use one of these routers for their
connection. Previously they have a residential Netgear router that
worked fine and still does.
It relays it to our IAS. Theres no mac access list for router only for
the CPEs.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Pat O'Connor
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco
: Re: [WISPA] Cisco ASA 5505
It relays it to our IAS. Theres no mac access list for router only for
the CPEs.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Pat O'Connor
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:07 AM
To: WISPA General List
= The Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) request
was not properly formatted.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Mikrotik concentrators
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Parr
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco ASA 5505
Sounds like pppoe on your network? What pppoe
17.63 on Amazon gets you a used copy, 30 bucks gets you a
brand new.
Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them down here!
Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
- Original Message -
From: Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
I waiting on his new one. Jack?
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
Anyone who does not not have Jack Unger’s book now is your time to get
it. It is the eBook and the offer is only good for 24 hours. Cost is
$9.99. Normally this is a $60 book.
Thanks Josh. It was a pain but worth it!
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Josh
Luthmanj...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Congrats! :)
On 8/16/09, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I've switched from T1's to fiber and no longer need my Cisco 7204-VXR.
If you're interested, please hit me
Congrats! :)
On 8/16/09, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I've switched from T1's to fiber and no longer need my Cisco 7204-VXR.
If you're interested, please hit me offline. -RickG
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
And if you do have a used Cisco and you need some help, guess what?
They'll usually do their best to help you! They figure down the road,
you're going to need to upgrade and purchase more of their equipment,
licenses, etc. Leave the customer (or future customer) with warm
fuzzies, and
On Jun 3, 2009, at 6:26 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
So you actually don't have any documentation that resale of Cisco gear
transfer the IOS license, thus making the gear usable (in Cisco's
eyes)
to the second-hand buyer. Gotcha.
Do you have any actual documentation where Cisco successfully
-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blake Bowers
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco 1710 and 3600 routers
It was my error, em, not e to m. Ear to Mouth. Basically just
makes an analog pipe
I tried to look it up but I cannot figure it out. Whats an E to M card?
Blake Bowers wrote:
I have a local non-profit that has a PILE of 1710 and 1750 routers
that they want to sell. A couple of 3600 series routers, and
E to M cards.
Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we
Jenkins m...@smarterbroadband.net
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:33:51
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco 1710 and 3600 routers
I tried to look it up but I cannot figure it out. Whats an E to M card?
Blake Bowers wrote:
I have a local non-profit that has a PILE
That's EM, it's used to connect to analog voice stuff, in place of FXS
or FXO cards.
John
Matt Jenkins wrote:
I tried to look it up but I cannot figure it out. Whats an E to M card?
Blake Bowers wrote:
I have a local non-profit that has a PILE of 1710 and 1750 routers
that they want to
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco 1710 and 3600 routers
I tried to look it up but I cannot figure it out. Whats an E to M card?
Blake Bowers wrote:
I have a local non-profit that has a PILE of 1710 and 1750 routers
that they want
Did you setup the port you are on, to the right VLAN, or configure your
NIC on your laptop for that VLAN?
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org http://www.wispa.org/
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support
Thanks Dennis! You are my hero!
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net dmburg...@linktechs.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] cisco switch help
Did you setup the port you
...@linktechs.net
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] cisco switch help
Did you setup the port you are on, to the right VLAN, or configure your
NIC on your laptop for that VLAN?
--
* Dennis Burgess, CCNA
787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 9:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Just be careful if they want to do there own VLANs
Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode trunk, all VLAN's are
allowed
(I even issued the command switchport trunk allowed vlan all
and it
did not display on the sho
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Well, we can... But we only use them as POP routers We have a
couple with Metro Ethernet Fiber Backhauls running 100 mbps to our Core
facility, doing MPLS / VPLS ... No wireless stuff, we are a Moto shop
Those
Have you added the VLAN to the VLAN database on all the switches
between them? (Assuming you are not usinh VTP) That's what I usually
forget.
(On 2900/3500)
# vlan database
# vlan NNN name blah
# apply
# exit
On 12/9/08, Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need some Cisco switch
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode trunk, all VLAN's are
allowed (I even issued the command "switchport trunk allowed vlan all"
and it did not display on the sho conf afterward).
Travis
Microserv
Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I need some Cisco
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode trunk, all VLAN's are allowed
(I even issued the command switchport trunk allowed vlan all and it
did not display on the sho conf afterward).
Travis
Microserv
Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
Travis Johnson
, December 09, 2008 5:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode trunk, all VLAN's are allowed
(I even issued the command switchport trunk allowed vlan all and it
did not display on the sho conf afterward).
Travis
Microserv
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode trunk, all VLAN's are allowed
(I even issued the command switchport trunk allowed vlan all and it
did not display on the sho conf afterward).
Travis
Microserv
Patrick Shoemaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode trunk, all VLAN's are allowed
(I even issued the command "switchport trunk allowed vlan all"
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Just a FYI, I would just create a tunnel between the two sites. No
configuration on your backend network, bandwidth restrictions are the
same as internet traffic typically, etc. Simpler, and no loop issues.
--
* Dennis Burgess
enabled are also trunking
VLANs active.
Eric
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode
is the
status of the port and that trunking VLANs enabled are also
trunking
VLANs active.
Eric
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
, December 09, 2008 9:26 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Just be careful if they want to do there own VLANs. If they do you will
need to dot1q tunnel them. Cisco has made it easy in that all you have
to do in addition to what you do now with a single VLAN is add
, December 09, 2008 5:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
Hi,
By default, when doing the switchport mode trunk, all VLAN's are
allowed
(I even issued the command switchport trunk allowed vlan all and it
did not display on the sho conf afterward).
Travis
Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
How can you possibly get 100 megs
Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Josh Luthman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:13 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
How can you possibly get 100
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:38 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco VLAN help
I answer with a question. What makes you think they couldn't do 100
megs?
I believe the original PowerRouter series does 5.9
stethernet x/y switchport" and see what is
the
status of the port and that trunking VLANs enabled are also trunking
VLANs active.
Eric
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
S
I have not used one, but being a Cisco I would think that it would be
rock solid.
We've started using MOXA switches and so far rock solid. Plus having two
24VDC inputs helps me sleep at night.
__
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
-Original
Maybe is the converter? The 2955 is rated to accept 18 - 32 vdc ..
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Randy Cosby
Sent: Monday,
I have no Cisco network gear of myself but I have several customers that
have gone through multiple routers and switches in the last 6 months. Can't
give you any models specifically but I know they were in the four and five
digit price point.
Replaced by a Routerboard in case anyone is
More research proves you are probably right. the converter we have
shuts down - or quits converting - at 11v. Recent storms have let
batteries get that low a couple times. Ordering a new converter today
that will go down to 7.5 v and adding more solar panels soon.
Randy
Gino Villarini
I doubt you 2955 will run at 7.5 VDC. Specs indicate 18 - 32VDC. I
would think you need a 24VDC power source and not a 12VDC. I am
surprised it ran at 12V (or 14 on a fully charged battery)
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Randy Cosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More research proves you are
It was a 24v source, (up-converted from 12v), but when the batteries
dropped to 11 v the upconverter shut off and pushed out only 11 (instead
of 24), and yeah, it didn't work and may have corrupted something.
Randy
Adam Goodman wrote:
I doubt you 2955 will run at 7.5 VDC. Specs indicate 18 -
Eric,
Thank a bunch! I'll let you know how it goes.
Jason
Eric Rogers wrote:
This config is actually off of a Cisco 2610. This router has a Dual WIC
and a Single WIC. The Single was the default gateway to another
location that housed our internet connection. The dual WIC was later
This config is actually off of a Cisco 2610. This router has a Dual WIC
and a Single WIC. The Single was the default gateway to another
location that housed our internet connection. The dual WIC was later
used for a bonded T1 solution. We had 4 bonded T1s before we switched
to fiber.
I have
Rogelio,
The Cisco website seems to be down at the moment but RF is still RF and
it behaves the same way indoors as it behaves outdoors except of course
if there are more obstructions indoors than outdoors.
In that case, then yes, depending on the nature of the obstructions,
more power would
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco on calculating RF values
Rogelio,
The Cisco website seems to be down at the moment but RF is still RF and
it behaves the same way indoors as it behaves outdoors except of course
if there are more obstructions indoors than
7609 sup720-3bxl
-Matt
On Aug 12, 2008, at 7:49 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Matt what you migrated to?
gino
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:29 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR
I figured I would mention. I have two GSRs (12008) that I am no longer
using that support full tables etc. I am happy to sell them for $3k
total or $1500 each. That is a no haggle below market price available
to folks on this list. They are currently being sold by a 3rd party
for $3k each.
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers (for sale)
I figured I would mention. I have two GSRs (12008) that I am no longer
using that support full tables etc. I am happy to sell them for $3k
total or $1500 each. That is a no haggle below market price available
to folks
787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 12:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers (for sale)
I figured I would mention. I have two GSRs (12008) that I
Make sure you're getting more than 256MB of RAM if you're doing full
routes to 2 different peers. The GSRs can be really expensive to upgrade
if they don't already have what you need.
Dylan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
List; Motorola Canopy User Group
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers
Make sure you're getting more than 256MB of RAM if you're doing full
routes to 2 different peers. The GSRs can be really expensive to upgrade
if they don't already have what you need.
Dylan
-Original Message-
From
Hi,
We just recently installed one of these (12008) to take a full OC3 feed.
We had to ugprade the memory (on the CPU card AND on the OC3 card), but
even then it was cheap. The only catch for most people is they are
240VAC... and they take up about 10u of rack space.
Travis
Microserv
Gino
Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 9:28 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers
Hi,
We just recently installed one of these (12008) to take a full OC3 feed.
We had to ugprade the memory (on the CPU card AND on the OC3 card), but
even then it was cheap. The only
and
VRRP/HSRP for link and hardware failover.
Regards,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dylan Bouterse
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:49 AM
To: WISPA General List; Motorola Canopy User Group
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers
, August 12, 2008 9:46 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers
Hi Gino,
GSRs are overkill for what you are doing. In the Cisco world, a couple
of
mid-range VXRs would be a better solution.
Or you could use a couple of ImageStream Rebel or Gateway routers for a
fraction
You could also do a 6500 or 7600 with dual Supervisors power
supplies. Mine carries full routes, dual GigE to the world, supports
GigE, FE, ATM OC3, DS3, Packet Over Sonet (over OC3 or OC12), 48 96-
port ethernet blades, and the list goes on. They have AC or DC power
supplies. And they
More importantly you need to have 256MB of line card memory on each
card if you plan on running full tables. Make sure you get the GRP-B
route processors with ECC memory.
-Matt
On Aug 12, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
Make sure you're getting more than 256MB of RAM if you're
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Dylan Bouterse
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 8:49 AM
To: WISPA General List; Motorola Canopy User Group
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers
Make sure you're getting more than 256MB of RAM if you're doing full
routes
to 2 different peers
The only 6500/7600 that can support full tables requires a
sup720-3bxl, which itself is much more expensive than a complete GSR.
-Matt
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Bryan Scott wrote:
You could also do a 6500 or 7600 with dual Supervisors power
supplies. Mine carries full routes, dual GigE
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:21:13AM -0400, Matt Liotta wrote:
On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
GSRs are overkill for what you are doing. In the Cisco world, a
couple of mid-range VXRs would be a better solution.
Or you could use a couple of ImageStream Rebel or Gateway
We installed a GSR with two processor cards and a single OC3 card. The
load on our UPS went up by 1% (APC 12kva). The heat generated by that
is nothing compared to the three Akamai caching servers (2u HP's with 8
SCSI drives each and dual power supplies).
Travis
Microserv
Scott Lambert
On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
What if you figure in the cost of a year or three of trying to feed
the
GSRs enough amps to keep them passing packets and enough amps to the
air
conditioner to keep them from melting?
For us it is irrelevant. We would need a VXR with a
Matt what you migrated to?
gino
-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:29 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers
On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Scott Lambert wrote:
What if you figure
'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco GSR Routers
Gino,
The answer to your question of to do Cisco GSR or not To, will depend on
what you are going to be comfortable with.
Since you are currently working with the Mikrotik Appliance, you may
find
working with a router of similar format, me be more suited
I've done Cisco, but it was a small install, just 4 1500 series
John
Dennis Burgess - Link Techs Inc wrote:
Mesh is a four letter word to most!
Dennis M. Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
--WISP/Network Support Services--
+1
Don, I did test the 1400 integrated units as a PtP bridge last summer
for 60 days. Worked flawlessly. Never set it up as an AP though. I liked
that it used two runs of 75ohm cable up the tower to the units with
three grounding blocks along the 150 ft path. I didn't keep them because
the Trango
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hulsebus
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 6:44 PM
To: wireless @wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco Wireless Bridges
Don, I did test the 1400 integrated units as a PtP bridge last summer
for 60 days. Worked flawlessly. Never set it up as an AP though. I liked
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco Wireless Bridges
They work OK for us in the East San Francisco Bay area.
They have the ability to move to a different channel if the noise gets
too bad.
JT
Don Annas wrote:
Is anyone using the Cisco 1300 or 1400 series AP/Bridges?
I know they are a bit pricing
They work OK for us in the East San Francisco Bay area.
They have the ability to move to a different channel if the noise gets
too bad.
JT
Don Annas wrote:
Is anyone using the Cisco 1300 or 1400 series AP/Bridges?
I know they are a bit pricing, but was curious how they performed in a
Cough, cough cough...
At 01:48 PM 10/4/2007, you wrote:
Is anyone using the Cisco 1300 or 1400 series AP/Bridges?
I know they are a bit pricing, but was curious how they performed in a noisy
environment?
Mike Cowan
Wireless Connections
A Division of ACC
166 Milan Ave
Norwalk, OH
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco Mesh Equipment
If it would stop raining..
We don't have it all deployed yet, but here is what we know.
They take a long time to boot, maybe 5 minutes.
The range is poor, they are supposed to put out 26 dBm per Cisco
Message-
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2006 05:56 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cisco Mesh Equipment
Define monitoring?
Up down status, or real time and historical data of link characteristics and
health?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless
If it would stop raining..
We don't have it all deployed yet, but here is what we know.
They take a long time to boot, maybe 5 minutes.
The range is poor, they are supposed to put out 26 dBm per Cisco, but they only
put out 14 dBm per the controller interface. We questioned Cisco on
I'm guessing here but I think that one end or the other is overloaded and
there's a backup of traffic. The Cisco then holds the data for x period of
time and it either gets through or it dies there
But I'm certainly no expert. I'm trying to remember the kinds of things
that happened
Butch -
Double check that the sonicwall is running 100-full, hard-code it if you
can. You should never see deferred transmissions on a 100-full connection.
Also check your ethernet cables.
You also might try putting a switch in between the Cisco and Sonicwall if
you can't hard-code it.
Russ
80 matches
Mail list logo
