Only searched for that spec, but it looks like 46dBm is labeled Macro
(which is the larger cell sites). At 5GHz with free space loss alone you
have 23dB loss in 7m, so as long as it's more than 7m further away than
your next AP on the same frequencies/channel that seems less of a concern
(assuming
Hi Walter,
Thank you for working this. If at all possible I’d like to credit the person(s)
who create this document. My thinking is to acknowledge, the person/people by
adding a “created by….” at footer of the document.
Regards,
John Chappell
IT Coordinator
Residence Services
Mount
Ok, they are working on removing UMich specific items so we can make it
available. Anyone who would just like to repurpose the text and create
something yourselves feel free.
I really think we should lean on each other for not only problems but
informational things like this so here are links to
I will work on getting this done.
Walter Reynolds
Principal Systems Security Development Engineer
Information and Technology Services
University of Michigan
(734) 615-9438
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Jason Watts wrote:
> I was going to ask as
Wow I go away for a few days and the thread blows up!
Thanks for all the responses so far, all this feedback is very useful and
greatly appreciated.
Great document from Walter Reynolds – this is the kind of thing we would put
near elevators and in laundry rooms in student Residences, online in
Makes sense.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Hall, Rand
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 8:43 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4GHz - educating end users about
A poster in the right place would have a better chance of being read than an
email, or something in a campus publication.
One of our problems is that there are multiple groups on campus trying to
compete for the attention of the students.
You can have the most beautifully crafted media, but
We would also be interested in gaining permission to use the language.
This looks really good!
Rob Kobiske
University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Allen Matthews
Sent:
Do you have the name of a contact person who develop this flyer? Can I
contact them and ask permission to borrow their language in this flyer? We
can give them credit, ask them if they want credit and if so, what do they
want it to say.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Walter Reynolds
On Feb 22, 2017, at 3:21 PM, Coehoorn, Joel wrote:
>
> IIRC, this has the same power limitations as WiFi and other unlicensed
> applications.
Someone on Slashdot found this report:
We’d be interested in using this PDF as well if possible – it reminds me
heavily of the Excel spreadsheet version of Wi-Fi interference and devices.
Very informative and well done.
Although it’s sometimes a losing battle with 2.4GHz and some students just
“don’t care” about the reason of these
That’s brilliant and disgusting all at the same time. It gives viral marketing
a whole new meaning. And I bet it’s effective!
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dexter Caldwell
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017
My primary use for this would be to calm down the haters. I'd put it on the
support website and when we can document an interference problem direct
impacted parties to it.
Rand
Rand P. Hall
Director, Network Services askIT!
Merrimack College
978-837-3532
rand.h...@merrimack.edu
13 matches
Mail list logo