Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Hunter Fuller
Also, I think saying that students "save $30 on the laptop buying it with just the 2.4 radio" implies an unrealistic degree of involvement in the technical aspects of buying a new computer. If people thought this way, I think we would see this problem less often, because everyone loves fast

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Wyatt Schill
Certainly not an option for us, being a community college means a lot of low income students. Possibly why I still see several handfuls of iPhone 4 phones (circa 2010) on my wifi. Lots of 2.4 only devices, and I don’t see that changing for a while. Wyatt Schill Senior Network Engineer

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Ian Lyons
I don’t think there is Nirvana. Just lesser degrees of complaints. Each environment seems to have unique challenges, both in the WiFi radio space *and* with applications and students “needs”. Students also, for whatever reason, do not share their “This sucks” messages with helpdesk/staff.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 vs 5

2017-03-07 Thread Danny Eaton
I see so many IoT devices that are 2.4 only; as well as the students save $30 on the laptop buying it with just the 2.4 radio (but it’s 802.11n!) that many of them come that way as well. We’re testing a “Rice Owls” (dual band) and a “Rice Owls 5 GHz” (uhm, 5 GHz only, of course) in limited