Ironically we were at 6.6.4 until early sunday morning at which point we
upgraded to 6.6.8 just in time for more fun.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Patrick McEvilly <
patrick_mcevi...@harvard.edu> wrote:
> We are on 6.6.7 and we’re affected.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:27 PM,
We are on 6.6.7 and we’re affected.
Patrick
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Norton, Thomas (Network Operations)
> wrote:
>
> Fortunately for us we weren’t affected by this, what code rev were you guys
> running?
>
> We are currently running 6.6.5
>
> T.J. Norton
>
Hi Guys,
I have an issue when I send requests via the eduroam website realm test tool
(eapol_test) and for some of them I get a "No response" or "Timeout" result,
and other times a success without changing the client configuration parameters.
Doing a tcpdump at my server and matching up
We run a large Aurba shop at liberty, and have been running an all wireless
solution in our dorms for some time now which were very happy with.
With that said every dorm environment is different, gathering requirements,
predictive planning, and design are key especially when dealing with
Fortunately for us we weren’t affected by this, what code rev were you guys
running?
We are currently running 6.6.5
T.J. Norton
Wireless Network Architect
Network Operations
(434) 592-6552
[cid:image001.png@01D342C7.0A20C040]
Liberty University | Training Champions for Christ since 1971
Bit us at 2:38 AM, took until 5 AM before I got called. By the time I got
to it the necessary correct update was in place so the policy server
restart got us on the air again.
Pretty tempted to block CP access to the CP update site so that we can open
it up at times more convenient for us.
On 11 Oct 2017, at 19:01, Ferguson, Michael wrote:
I didn’t see any (until Chad posted later) and so we thought our
issue was more isolated. We wasted 20 minutes of valuable MTTR time
collecting Server Logs when all we needed to do was start the
“Policy server” service.
"Only start the
First, get the APs out of the hallways and locate them where the users are. APs
in hallways can hear each other better than they casn hear clients.
Second, work with your Aruba account team to optimize your RF environment for
the different building structures. We have based our RF adjustments
Our Aruba SE alerted us but we are running 6.6.5. Out servers already had the
fixed version anyway.
For RADIUS monitoring we use Nagios and monitor twice. One services uses an
Active Directory service account, and a second one uses a ClearPass local user
account. Aruba recommends this to
I like the one wall rule Joel. That's a great way to state it and I never
though to express it that way. We still have AP's in hallways in some
locations but they are not penetrating multiple walls before it gets to the
user. We also have the one per suite issue with old construction.
Jacob
In regards to monitoring services on CPPM we send SNMP traps from CPPM to
our NMS. Traps for a service that starts or stops get forwarded as an email
notification from the NMS to our team.
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Ferguson, Michael
wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately, we
My experience is you can get good signal propagation without complaints
going through one wall, but not often more. We go every other room in a
checkboard pattern for traditional rooms, also using (formerly
Motorola=>Zebra) Extreme AP7502's, which I love (it's nice to finally see
someone else here
We tried the Xirrus in the hallway approach with some of our Residences a long
time ago and got burned by it. Even with their multiple sector AP’s that
Xirrus has with their higher-end products that have directional gain, they
still didn’t penetrate enough into the rooms to provide adequate
Sorry, I was mostly complaining about the one-per-room that vendors have been
trying to push. If they really will cover multiple rooms, that’s a different
option.
Thomas Carter
Network & Operations Manager / IT
Austin College
900 North Grand Avenue
Sherman, TX 75090
Phone: 903-813-2564
I have found with Cisco’s 1810Ws that we can get more than one room.
Obviously, this depends greatly on building construction, but we can typically
get at least 3 rooms covered with one Access Point. It’s really not that much
more than deploying the larger APs. I am looking at between 2-3x
I’ve complained to vendors about this before, but the problem is the
one-per-room deployment can be 2-4x the cost of in-hall deployment. At smaller
schools like ours, nebulous future support hours saved won’t make up for
current costs now. The biggest issue is an in-hall AP that supports 4-6
We moved to Meraki, and placed the Aps in rooms based on the building (not in
each room) but enough to ensure good coverage
m
Mark Reboli
Network/Telecom Manager
Misericordia University
(570) 674-6753
This e-mail and accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is
intended
We started with an all wireless residence halls concept three years ago and
will finish the last three (fairly small) installs next summer. We went with
in-room access points supplemented with APs in common areas. For traditional
residence halls we went with Cisco 702w initially changing to
Move to in-room design even if the cost seems problematic. Vendors have never
recommended in-hallway as a solution (well, maybe with the exception of xirrus
because of their technology), and all the magic sauce works best when WAPs are
deployed properly. While a WAP in every-room isn’t a
We moved away from hallway deployments. Now we have one AP for every other
room away from the bathroom walls.
ANKIT AGARWAL
Network Engineer
Educational Technology Services
aagar...@cca.edu | o 510.594.5018
Eighth St. | San Francisco | CA | 94107
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Adam T.
Unfortunately, we were hit by the same bug as Chad and possibly a few others on
the list. It looks like the problem affects Clearpass customers running
6.6.7+. We struggled to find a fix early this morning and finally got services
up around 7:15 am pacific time once we identified the issue.
We also switched from hallway deployment to nearly every suite. It solved
our issues. We have about 6,000 beds.
Adam
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Brad Weldon
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 12:17
A few years ago we transitioned from in-hall APs to 1 or 2 in every suite
or 1 for every 2 dorm rooms. Complaints went way down. We based the
decision on RSSI values and that most students were bringing newer hardware
that supported 5 GHz. Much of our roll-out occurred by updating classroom
and
We went with Cisco 1810w’s in every room over the summer. The number of calls
and incidents have dropped dramatically. The dense deployment has permitted us
to disable a lot of 2.4, and the 1810w’s permit us to save switch ports in the
closet. We also went with Cisco 3802/2802i’s in the
Fortunately for us, we are still on 6.6.5 and we were not affected by this.
This did make me think about how fragile the operational state of the ClearPass
cluster can be. Looking through my event logs, I see the AV/AS updates
happening 20 plus time a day and they hit all of our servers
Umut -
We used to do APs in the hallways years ago, but had similar complaints
that you are receiving. We've been doing in-room APs for the last 5 years
and the complaints have dropped significantly. We are an Extreme Networks
customer and use their AP7502 (
Hello all,
We have 500 Aruba APs for 3000 students in dorm building hallways however
we are getting complaint still even if fine tuning because of walls. I
think it is very contemporary issue for many.
In every room with Aruba solution would be very expensive. We'd like to ask
you what is your
For the Toronto 2015 Pan American Games, AmpThink was retained by the TO2015
organizing committeee to create the (several) designs for games venue Wi-Fi
coverage. One of those venues is on-campus next to the building I am in now.
At the time, AmpThink's billing rate for engagement seemed to
28 matches
Mail list logo