: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?
I've got an update on AP groups. We've had quite an interesting week. As I
mentioned before, we are running 5.2.178 code on our WiSMs, and after applying
the new ap groups to a more extensive number of APs we are started
We upgraded from 4.2.176 to 5.2.178.
Hector
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Hector J Rios [hr...@lsu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:39 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain
, 2009 6:52 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override
to AP Groups- Pain?
Hector-
For clarity, if you configure an AP and simply leave it in the default
group, are you saying that in some cases all SSIDs don't get
transmitted
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of
Hector J Rios
Sent: Fri 6/12/2009 9:38 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?
Correct. The WLAN exists, but since
Here is the bug ID: CSCsy18685
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of
Hector J Rios
Sent: Fri 6/12/2009 9:58 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?
Here is the bug ID: CSCsy18685
**
Participation and subscription information
-Original Message-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 6:52 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override
I've got an update on AP groups. We've had quite an interesting week. As
I mentioned before, we are running 5.2.178 code on our WiSMs, and after
applying the new ap groups to a more extensive number of APs we are
started experiencing problems. The one problem that I can mention to you
guys is
: Friday, May 29, 2009 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?
Yes after the code upgrade, all the old WLAN override settings are gone and
all the APs are put into default-group and broadcasting all SSIDs. Then you
need to create
I have to correct myself. When APs are assigned to new AP groups, the
APs need to be restarted for the new changes to take effect. WCS will do
this automatically. It is a little deceiving when you do it from the
controller because when you apply the changes, there is no pop-up
alerting you that
to go make a visit to the 1252's POE injector to
reboot them.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco
Upgrade WCS to the latest version ahead of time and build new AP groups based
on your WLAN Override settings in WCS. Upgrade the controllers to at least
5.2.178.xx (it has the VLAN group fix). Push out VLAN groups from WCS to the
controllers.
Jeff
Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu 05/29/09 7:49
, 2009 9:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?
Knowing that some have already gone down this road...
We are still on stable 4.2.code, have not jumped to 5 yet. It is our
understanding that stable 5 code
] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:49 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP
Groups- Pain?
Knowing that some have already gone down this road...
We are still on stable 4.2.code, have not jumped to 5
-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On
Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Friday, May 29,
2009 9:49 AM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject:
[WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco
LWAPP- The change from WLAN Override to AP Groups- Pain?
Knowing that some have
already gone down this road
We are still
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP Guest Portal Satisfaction
Looking for feedback- on or off list- from anyone who is using the
built-in web access portal for guest use on a production scale.
Thanks-
Lee
Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP Guest Portal Satisfaction
Answers below:
How (or where) do you enforce the http/https restriction?
We created an ACL on the controllers to the guest interface.
Any demand to allow VPN protocols out?
The way we look at guests
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP Guest Portal Satisfaction
Thanks Hector (and Mike and David). Hector- we see visitors with
locked-down laptops that expect to be able to VPN out over a guest path-
that's where that question originates. Everything else makes sense... is
your
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP, multicast/peer to peer blocking
modes
We have 12 WiSMs at SU (24 controllers) and around 1,550 APs online. By
default on the controllers under General System configuration options,
Ethernet Multicast Support is disabled by default, and we chose to
enable
effecting his/her requirements).
Regards,
Jon Freeman
Xirrus, Inc.
303-808-2666
From: Lee H Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 6:28 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP, multicast/peer
I believe this is the code they use in the trading floors where Airespace
(now Cisco) has their gear.
Frank
From: Lee H Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 1:46 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP- Pico cell
Just
H. Badman
Wireless/Network Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443-3003
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 4:05 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP Lobby Ambassador/Guest Access
If you are using the lobby ambassador to grant guest access you might
want
to look into adding Cisco Clean Access. You can put a CAS right in
front of
a controller in the DMZ and create an anchor from a controller
]
-Original Message-
From: Earl Barfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 3:17 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
From:Justin Aharoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco LWAPP
Good morning all,
In following
Good morning all,
In following the recent conversation about the Lightweight AP's,
conversion and infancy bugs I didn't notice much about a problem we are
having. Our infrastructure is all Cisco products. When converting 1200
series AP's to the Lightweight code I experience no issues what so
Justin,
I had similar problems when I was running an older version of IOS on the controller. It was some flavor of 3.0. I recommend 4.0.179.8. Give it a try.
John V. DuranUniversity of New MexicoNetwork AnalystITS/Network Communications/Data ServicesPh: (505) 249-7890Fax: (505) 277-8101
something new ... Remember, amateurs built the
Ark ... Professionals built the Titanic.
-Original Message-
From: Lee Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 12:02 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP SNMP Traps
Revisiting
wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:53:09 -0400
From: Lee Badman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: 802.11 wireless issues listserv
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Now that we are into a Cisco LWAPP conversion
, 19 Sep 2006 19:53:09 -0400
From: Lee Badman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: 802.11 wireless issues listserv
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Now that we are into a Cisco LWAPP conversion/rollout, wondering
was going
on.
David Gillett
-Original Message-
From: Charles Spurgeon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:14 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Todd,
Many thanks for your replies to the issue list from
-
LMU|LA IT: We Deliver!
-Original Message-
From: Todd M. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 2:26 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Yes, it took us a month and we finally got a Cisco
-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
I don't think that's correct at all- CDP makes no difference in my
findings as to whether APs come up or not.
Lee
Lee H. Badman
Network Engineer
CWNA, CWSP
Information Technology and Services
Syracuse University
315 443
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:53 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Now that we are into a Cisco LWAPP conversion/rollout, wondering if
anyone else has found these issues to be obstacles to
deployment/support, or if in the grand scheme you've
wrote:
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:53:09 -0400
From: Lee Badman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: 802.11 wireless issues listserv
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Now that we are into a Cisco LWAPP conversion/rollout
: Lee Badman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Todd-
Good info (thanks to the others responding as well). On the scripting,
I'm sure we could do it as well, but for the cost of the LWAPP
environment, I'd like
Title: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Joe,
Did you have any problems upgrading the controllers or WCS from version 3.0.x.x to the 4.0.66.0 version of WCS. While upgrading a controller from 3.0.x.x to a 4.0.x.x I found that not all the settings were saved. Several previously made interfaces
Title: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
We actually installed 4.0 on a new box and
just pulled the configs off of the controllers again without any problems. But
we were told by Cisco that you should not run a newer ver of WCS with an older
ver of the WiSM code, or vice versa
Title: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco LWAPP
Actually, that's a little misleading.
Newer versions of WCS with older WISM code is OK. (Not the
best, but OK)
Newer versions of WISM, with older WCS is NOT OK. (WCS asks
a question, WISM gives a response WCS is not prepared to
answer)
From: Roth
39 matches
Mail list logo
