to verify dhcp
option 43 was being received correctly.
Anthony
Original message
>Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:06:25 -0500
>From: Lee Badman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] LWAPP APs Disassociating From Controllers
>To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:47 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] LWAPP APs Disassociating From
Controllers
>
> 4.0.179.11.
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/2/2007 10:42 AM >>>
> What version
ave the 1010's, and there is a specific bug fix in that
release we've been chasing)
But you never know, it might be related.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lee Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:47 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDU
me?
--Joe
-Original Message-
From: Lee Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:47 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] LWAPP APs Disassociating From Controllers
4.0.179.11.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/2/2007 10:42 AM >&g
; -Original Message-
> From: Lee Badman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:47 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] LWAPP APs Disassociating From Controllers
>
> 4.0.179.11.
>
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2
4.0.179.11.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/2/2007 10:42 AM >>>
What version code are you running on the controllers?
> -Original Message-
> Am opening a TAC case, but to save some some time from the
> loathsome LWAPP debug process, wondering if anyone has
> experienced this condition?
What version code are you running on the controllers?
> -Original Message-
> Am opening a TAC case, but to save some some time from the
> loathsome LWAPP debug process, wondering if anyone has
> experienced this condition?
**
Participation and subscription information for this
