Thanks for your ideas. I searched the registry and deleted references to it
and it still occurs. I turned off WINS on the server and it still tries to
hit the bps-ntserver1.
I turned off netbios over TCP/IP in the control panel and then it stopped.
I don't know where else to look in windows if
>
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:25:40 +1100, "Jon Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > Hi all
> >
> >
> >
> > Hope you can help. I tried Wireshark on my network and once a winxp
> > client
> > logs into my network (Win 2003 server as DC) I see NBNS name query nb
> > bps-ntserver1
> >
The foll
Hi Guy,
Ya it seems I am really pointing my finger now at the os or card to
find out if I can change this.
Thanks for your input anyway
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: 18 February 2007 22:51
To: Community suppor
William Murphy wrote:
> Luis Ontanon wrote:
>
>> does snoop work in promiscuous mode?
>
> Supposedly
Try snoop on your V440, capturing traffic on the interface connected to
the switch's monitored port (i.e., the same port on which you tried
tcpdump and *shark), and see if you see any traff
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3947/6mjgnrl80?a=view says that
ce does actually support promiscuous mode.
You might have to change something in /kernel/drv/ce.conf but honestly
I do not knopw what.
Luis
On 2/18/07, William Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Supposedlyi have tried w
Have you tried doing a search in the registry for "ntserver1" or
similar?
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:25:40 +1100, "Jon Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> Hope you can help. I tried Wireshark on my network and once a winxp
> client
> logs into my network (Win 2003 server as DC) I s
Supposedlyi have tried with tethereal also and it has same effect.No
traffic captured
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis Ontanon
Sent: 18 February 2007 21:12
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] List
does snoop work in promiscuous mode?
On 2/18/07, William Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>Ok changed the rights on the file
>
> crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 11, 80 May 14 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:ce
>
> but this still does not make a difference. I did not restart the system.
> Just
Hi,
Ok changed the rights on the file
crw-rw-rw- 1 root sys 11, 80 May 14 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:ce
but this still does not make a difference. I did not restart the system.
Just changed rights and made trace which did not work.
Will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi I cant seem to snoop as root. Makes no difference.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # ls -la /dev/ce
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 May 14 2006 /dev/ce ->
../devices/pseudo/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:ce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # ls -la ../devices/pseudo/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:ce
crw--- 1 root sys 11, 8
I used to capture promiscous on sun boxen without any problem.
So it might be an issue with permissions of the /dev/ node for the
interface which I remember I had to change myself.
.
Can you capture as root?
If so which are the permissions on /dev/ifname?
What happens if you change permissions on
Hi ,
Thanks for getting back to metcpdump does not capture eitheri
have been reading up on this and here it is.
The laptop I use is not as secure as Sun server and the nic card can be
turned into promiscuous mode easily by software,
But on the Sun server I don't think the software can t
What about tcpdump, does it capture?
What happen if you run it as root, can you capture?
is /dev/ifname readable by the user you are trying to capture with?
On 2/18/07, William Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>Don't know if this is the correct board to put this too but hear goes
Hi All,
Don't know if this is the correct board to put this too but hear goes
anyway.
I am having problems listening for packets on my Sun Machine.
I have a F5 BIGIP switch on which I mirrored the traffic port(i.e.9) to
another port 16 for listening and tracing. In port 16 bi run a cabl
Hi All,
Don't know if this is the correct board to put this too but hear goes
anyway.
I am having problems listening for packets on my Sun Machine.
I have a F5 BIGIP switch on which I mirrored the traffic port(i.e.9) to
another port 16 for listening and tracing. In port 16 bi run a cabl
Hi all
Hope you can help. I tried Wireshark on my network and once a winxp client
logs into my network (Win 2003 server as DC) I see NBNS name query nb
bps-ntserver1
The bps-ntserver1 was an old NT 4 server but I have since built a new
domain. I have a feeling a reg key or something is still
16 matches
Mail list logo