RE: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Jesse Parker
It might be as easy as setting the host and port in the client config file, and adding the client IP to the validHosts on the server. It's more complicated when the firewall is doing address/port mapping. On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Wilcox, Jamileh wrote: > That's an interesting idea and might solve so

Re: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Mark Bushaw
I didn't know you could do that! Thanks Jesse. Mark Bushaw - Original Message - From: "Jesse Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 2:36 PM Subject: Re: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls > Another option is to split Tango in two at the client,

RE: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Wilcox, Jamileh
That's an interesting idea and might solve some other problems we've got. How do you split Tango like that, though? I've talked to a SQL guru across campus; he seems to think it's no big deal and has even offered to help test, so I have great hopes that it will all go smoothly. That would be a

Re: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Jesse Parker
Another option is to split Tango in two at the client, leaving your webserver and the Tango client (plugin) outside the firewall or in a DMZ, and keeping the Tango server and DB inside. In this case you'll need to open a port for the Tango client connection (18100 by default, but configurable.) T

RE: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Wilcox, Jamileh
Jason - OK, thanks. That's what I was hoping, but since I couldn't find anything in the docs, I wasn't sure. Thanks very much for the info! j > -Original Message- > From: Jason Pamental [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subjec

RE: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Kevin Quinn
The only connection between the 2 is the ODBC driver. -Original Message- From: Wilcox, Jamileh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls Well, we've got an odd bit of setup. This webserver with T

RE: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Wilcox, Jamileh
Well, we've got an odd bit of setup. This webserver with Tango will be outside the firewall, with the SQL server inside the firewall. So I'm concerned about the ports that Tango & SQL use to talk. Sorry I didn't explain that better - and thanks for your list. I'll hang on to it, because I'm goi

Re: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Jason Pamental
Jamileh, If you are going to keep the web/app server outside the firewall, you just need to configure your datasources on the web server to connect via tcp/ip over whatever port you specify (1433 by default) to the remote machine inside the firewall. You might also want to restrict remote

RE: Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Ben Johansen
The only ports the need to be getting through the firewall Are 80 http 25 smtp 110 pop3 21 ftp 143 IMAP 443 SSL Witango will talk to SQL Server within your secured network the resulting answers will go out HTTP port So all the ports for SQL Server should be blocked from the outside world Ben J

Witango-Talk: Tango and Firewalls

2003-03-11 Thread Wilcox, Jamileh
I've just been handed a new little project, which involves keeping our public Internet applications up & running while moving our SQL server behind a firewall. I've researched the SQL side - according to MS, we need port 1433 open inbound and ports 1025-5000 open outbound (assuming that I'm read

Witango-Talk: Getting Javabeans to work with Witango...

2003-03-11 Thread John McGowan
Does the witango app server installer put everything needed to use javabeans with witango on the server? Didn't the Tango2K installer install everything that was needed for javabeans? /John TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain te

Re: Witango-Talk: Do I smell something burning?

2003-03-11 Thread Stephen Arnold
For FMP users, Andy Knasinski has written a really nifty FMP DB Mailer that flags bad emails as well as receives reply emails for delete requests. I've used it successfully to mail to our ecommerce customers for sales, etc. Reach his site at http://www.nrgsoft.com and ask him about Mailing Ma

Re: Witango-Talk: Do I smell something burning?

2003-03-11 Thread Nicholas Froome
Wayne If the messages are not customised, why not use a mailing list server like LetterRip? Or you could write a message file for the outgoing mail folder of SIMS (I imagine it's like EIMS in this respect) plus a list of recipients and let the server do the hard work The bottom line is that i

Re: Witango-Talk: Do I smell something burning?

2003-03-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What might be usefull is an email list managed by your mail server. Then you'd > only need to send one email to the list and the rest is handled by the mail > server. The only question would be how to keep the list subscriber information > current. Although, I'm sure that there is a solution f

Re: Witango-Talk: Do I smell something burning?

2003-03-11 Thread Dave Machin
I have to also recommend WorldMerge - (http://www.worldmerge.com/) about the same price and performance. We do an hourly scheduled batch email using MS-SQL scheduled DTS packages that create tables that WorldMerge reads when it sends it's emails. - Original Message - From: "[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Witango-Talk: Do I smell something burning?

2003-03-11 Thread Mike Tyranski
What might be usefull is an email list managed by your mail server. Then you'd only need to send one email to the list and the rest is handled by the mail server. The only question would be how to keep the list subscriber information current. Although, I'm sure that there is a solution for that

Re: Witango-Talk: Do I smell something burning?

2003-03-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For 45.000 Emails, I recommend "Advanced Direct Mailer" http://www.mailutilities.com/adr/. Cost's: 40$ !!! I self use ADR since years with Witango to send very fast personality Emails. On this way, we can send 400 Mails/Minute (on our 2MB line). So, for you 45.000 Mails you need aprox 112 Minutes

RE: Witango-Talk: Do I smell something burning?

2003-03-11 Thread Stefan Gonick
This is similar to the solution that I use. Instead of mailing all the messages right away (45,000 of them), I write all of the message to a mail_pool table. I have a cron job that runs every 5 minutes. The cron job gets 200 records, mails them, and deletes them. It eventually works through the who