If you are trying to add a new JDBC datasource, it helps to have a TAF open (ANY taf). Otherwise it is likely to crash.
Also, you can directly edit the jdbc.ini file (CAREFULLY). You need some specialized info from OpenBase to do so, see below (and I don't know what that is).
Make a copy of
Steve,
Are you using the builders?
These work fine for me with Oterro 2.6 and 3.0, with the limit to xx rows
and previous xx and next xx links, but I have customized the builder
considerably.
Bill
At 11:12 PM 3/8/2004, you wrote:
I am trying to construct a DBMS Select action that will limit
Hey list !
I'am trying to get the StoreFront Demo to work on my W2K, IIS, Witango 5
server (049), Witango 5.0 Studio and Access db but having problems with
the method application$common HTTPRedirect...
I always get :
Client Error
The response received from the application server is invalid
Hello Mike,
Thank you for your help! I'll give it a shot,
and let you know how it pans out.
Rick Sanders
Rick,
If
you have Tango running on a Windows NT/2000 box, I would do the
following:
Use an
External Command Action in Tango to execute the
Hi Steve,
Yes, that's pretty much what I want to do. What
I understand is that I have to use the command line from WiTango and put the
results in a text file and search the text file from WiTango.
Rick Sanders
You can do the
listing of all the files in the
Bill Jason,
Windows 2003 Web Edition, R:Tango version 5, Oterro 3.0 update 3
Yes this used to work correctly for me with R:Tango 2000 as well. When I
upgraded to version 5 is when it changed.
I just tried using a search builder for a test, used the default of 20 for
Limit to and it listed 28
Brengt,
I changed the method to the following with help from Scott Cadillac.
@assign request$httpHeader @var application$RedirectPrefixLocation:
@var method$URL
encoding=metahtml@crlf@setcookies@userreferencecookie@crlf@crlf
The variable RedirectPrefix should be set to HTTP/1.0 302 Moved@CRLF
Steve,
The limit does the following.
It processes the full select and then limits the rows returning.
So if the select returns a 100 rows with the limit, then the limit = 20
prevents the last 80 from returning.
Your are better servered by using the COUNT criteria
Ben Johansen -
Steve,
This is quite weird! I went to look at my taf that does this just fine, and
it doesn't do this just fine anymore!
I have a taf that pages in 50s, and has been working great this way with
next/previous buttons and your configuration as below, except that at the
client site is is Oterro
A followup:
This definitely was broken in Witango server 5.0 after patch .58 and before
patch .65. I have a site still running on .58. A taf that observes the
limit and pages groups of 40 just fine in .58 puts the whole result set on
the page on a server running .65.
I'll send the example
I need to write a .taf that returns it's results as basic XML to the client over the
internet. The taf is responding to a few arguments passed to it and returning a few
values formatted in XML that our end client will integrate into their reporting
software.
Do I need to set-up a custom http
With the release of Filemaker 7 I am looking to figure out which
product is the replacement for the version 6 unlimited product. (they
have changed the positioning of their products)
I thought I saw a post from Phil a few weeks back on this but cannot
find it in the archive.
Looks like it is
I'm curious if FMP7 is equivalent of MS Access or something better now.
If better, can the single user version play as a witango back end
without the constraints of the previous version?
On Mar 9, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Chuck Leavens wrote:
With the release of Filemaker 7 I am looking to figure out
It looks as if there are some very good new features but the support
lines at Filemaker NOW say (I have been in an ongoing dialog with
them today) it cannot be used at all now with Witango. (Actually they
called it Tango and I had to educate them on the product) The phone
support people have
Chuck,
Phil and Sophie are on a plane to the states at the moment; but
hopefully someone from support will chime in. I suspect that it will
connect just fine via JDBC on OS X, but haven't had a chance to test
it. If I do over the next day or so I'll let you know. I've been
through setting
Not to worry. I am able to connect to it as a datasource. ODBC and JDBC. I
have not tried it on my OSX box yet just windows.
I am in a 7 training class for advanced developers all this week so I will
probably not have a change to post to extensive a list of new stuff etc but
there is a lot to
Thanks Bill. I thought something was up here.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Bill Downall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Witango-Talk: DBMS Action Select with Limit # or Rows
A followup:
This definitely was broken
This issue is in flux and by the time server is released should be a non
issue. But you will not be able to use the client and will not want too so
you will have to use server.
It will help if you write FileMaker and express the need for OS X JDBC and
ODBC. As far as I know the decision has not
We are committed to implement technologies cross platform when possible and
intend to provide full support for ODBC/JDBC on the Mac as soon as possible
but can't provide dates at this stage, said FileMaker spokesman Kevin
Mallon.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Leavens [mailto:[EMAIL
Title: Re: Witango-Talk: connectting to OpenBase
Hi, you are not alone, but i guess i can help:
I do have everything running and made a cookbook about that at
http://www.apocm.de/witango
Please download the latest driver from OpenBase.
If you have further questions, let me know.
Christian
then FMP is history.
It was already, but this drives a stake through its heart
On Mar 9, 2004, at 5:33 PM, Dan Stein wrote:
We are committed to implement technologies cross platform when
possible and
intend to provide full support for ODBC/JDBC on the Mac as soon as
possible
but can't provide
21 matches
Mail list logo
