[WiX-users] Shouldn’t WiX be Production/Stable instead of Beta?

2007-01-08 Thread Mike Green
WiX is currently shown with a Development Status of 'Beta' on the WiX Project Summary page. That sends the wrong message to existing and potential users of WiX. Surely WiX (V2) can now be regarded as 'Production/Stable' can’t it? I am also interested in the planned timetable for WiX V3 taking

Re: [WiX-users] Shouldn’t WiX be Production/Stable instead of Beta?

2007-01-08 Thread Francis Kam
Rob actually wrote a post on his blog about this in December: http://robmensching.com/blog/archive/2006/12/19/Drive-to-a-WiX-v2-toolset-final-release.aspx -Francis On 1/8/07, Mike Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WiX is currently shown with a Development Status of 'Beta' on the WiX Project

Re: [WiX-users] Shouldn’t WiX be Production/Stable instead of Beta?

2007-01-08 Thread Scott Palmer
Soon as I saw that Wix V2 required me to enter short file names I immediately tossed it in the garbage (keeping backwards 8.3 filenames in the OS was one of Microsoft's stupidest ideas) and moved to Wix V3. The only issue I've had with Wix V3 is that it didn't work properly for installing

Re: [WiX-users] Shouldn’t WiX be Production/Stable instead of Beta?

2007-01-08 Thread Bob Arnson
Scott Palmer wrote: Strangely enough Wix supports localized UIs, yet it requires you to layout all the UI components using absolute positioning. I guess all languages take the same amount of space ;-) ? To be anally-retentive precise, it's MSI that requires it, not WiX. And anything WiX