On Tue, February 21, 2012, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Not really, but Window Maker is the window manager of choice for
> GNUstep. There is a lot of symbiosis between the two.
Would not call it symbiosis since one works perfectly well
without the other, also WM is not based on *Step code.
Chee
begin quoting Carlos R. Mafra as of Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:07:08PM +:
[snip]
> It's not "cool" stuff. I worry about two things only. Mounting external
> media and connecting to a wireless network. And I see a lot of people
> spreading wrong information about this, that if you use wmaker you
>
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 at 21:09:09 +, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> off-list
I guess I need some medication to get the keystrokes right.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
off-list
You're right, disabling those options in the Expert panel does not
solve this, we need your patch.
But can you please take a look at The-perfect-Window-Maker-patch.txt
in the topdir of the wmaker source?
I can not apply your patch because git rejects it now.
--
To unsubscribe, send m
Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> The text is not even accurate, Window Maker is not part of the GNUstep
> project, afaik.
Not really, but Window Maker is the window manager of choice for
GNUstep. There is a lot of symbiosis between the two.
-john
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr.
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 at 13:23:21 +0100, Just a Normal Person wrote:
> Hi, I have noticed that in WindowMaker 0.95.2 application icons bounce
> when some actions are done, like starting a program, etc.
> Disabling Superfluous or Animations also disabled the minimizing
> animation which I am used to,
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 at 0:23:41 +, SJS wrote:
>
> The problem statement, as I understand it, is that there's not enough cool
> stuff readily accessible on a default installation from a major distribution
> to get the attention of the ADD crowd.
It's not "cool" stuff. I worry about two things
begin quoting Carlos R. Mafra as of Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 01:19:15PM +:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 12:14:30 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> >
> > About including default dock apps in distros, I think it can be
> > tricky because everyone prefers different dockapps. (For example,
Exactly!
> > I'
Hi,
I am writing a patch to do the following.
- The WApplication structure has a WWindow struct.
- The WWindow struct has aa RImage struct (net_icon_image)
- The WApplication structure has a WAppIcon struct.
- The WAppIcon struct has WIcon struct.
- The WIcon struct has a RImage struct (file_imag
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project wmaker-crm.git.
The branch, next has been updated
discards 28162d769d4f37ede1f3f3facdd4ded0d2be1c52 (commit)
via 799134f59bd764230
> Everybody has their own preferences and that's OK.
>
> But what really makes me sad about the default minimalistic approach
> is that it makes it harder for other people to try wmaker.
>
> I see people saying "yeah, ok, it's a nice and clean interface and
> I like it, but the easiness to mount my
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project wmaker-crm.git.
The branch, next has been updated
via 28162d769d4f37ede1f3f3facdd4ded0d2be1c52 (commit)
via f2585dc1f74796628
Hi, I have noticed that in WindowMaker 0.95.2 application icons bounce
when some actions are done, like starting a program, etc.
Disabling Superfluous or Animations also disabled the minimizing
animation which I am used to, so doing that didn't do the job.
Everyone has got his or her own tastes, bu
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 at 11:27:46 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> This could be as simple as having some dockapps packaged and installed
> via Suggests and having a menu from where they can be started and if
> the user likes them they can dock them. This allows customisation and
> avoids the "one size
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 12:14:30 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
I'd add wmnd to control network interfaces.) If some default set is
included then they should be Suggests instead of Requires if the
packaging system supports that (rpm and dpkg does) becaus
15 matches
Mail list logo
