Debian folder in git? [Re: PowerPC Icon Fix Patch [wmaker-crm]]

2012-01-20 Thread Martin Dietze
On Thu, January 19, 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: The original motivation for the debian/ folder was to help people test wmaker-crm by making a debian package out of it. Now that wmaker-crm is on debian, it should be removed to avoid this kind of confusion. Whatever debian does to the

Re: Debian folder in git? [Re: PowerPC Icon Fix Patch [wmaker-crm]]

2012-01-20 Thread Daniel Isenmann
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:58:05 +0100 Martin Dietze d...@fh-wedel.de wrote: On Thu, January 19, 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: The original motivation for the debian/ folder was to help people test wmaker-crm by making a debian package out of it. Now that wmaker-crm is on debian, it should

Re: Debian folder in git? [Re: PowerPC Icon Fix Patch [wmaker-crm]]

2012-01-20 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 at 1:23:41 +0100, Martin Dietze wrote: You don't always have that luxury. Here we have it and some people feel offended by a few files they are not using and which cause a few more commits... You have a point. I personally don't care about debian/ nor about any other

Re: Debian folder in git? [Re: PowerPC Icon Fix Patch [wmaker-crm]]

2012-01-20 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/20/2012 16:08, David Rawson Couzelis wrote: Of course using a package manager is better than installing using make install. I think everyone agrees on that. But that doesn't mean the files used by a package manager should be provided by the package developer. That's what package