On Tue, February 21, 2012, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Not really, but Window Maker is the window manager of choice for
> GNUstep. There is a lot of symbiosis between the two.
Would not call it symbiosis since one works perfectly well
without the other, also WM is not based on *Step code.
Chee
begin quoting Carlos R. Mafra as of Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:07:08PM +:
[snip]
> It's not "cool" stuff. I worry about two things only. Mounting external
> media and connecting to a wireless network. And I see a lot of people
> spreading wrong information about this, that if you use wmaker you
>
Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> The text is not even accurate, Window Maker is not part of the GNUstep
> project, afaik.
Not really, but Window Maker is the window manager of choice for
GNUstep. There is a lot of symbiosis between the two.
-john
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr.
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 at 0:23:41 +, SJS wrote:
>
> The problem statement, as I understand it, is that there's not enough cool
> stuff readily accessible on a default installation from a major distribution
> to get the attention of the ADD crowd.
It's not "cool" stuff. I worry about two things
begin quoting Carlos R. Mafra as of Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 01:19:15PM +:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 12:14:30 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> >
> > About including default dock apps in distros, I think it can be
> > tricky because everyone prefers different dockapps. (For example,
Exactly!
> > I'
> Everybody has their own preferences and that's OK.
>
> But what really makes me sad about the default minimalistic approach
> is that it makes it harder for other people to try wmaker.
>
> I see people saying "yeah, ok, it's a nice and clean interface and
> I like it, but the easiness to mount my
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 12:14:30 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
I'd add wmnd to control network interfaces.) If some default set is
included then they should be Suggests instead of Requires if the
packaging system supports that (rpm and dpkg does) becaus
On 02/19/2012 02:19 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> But what really makes me sad about the default minimalistic approach
> is that it makes it harder for other people to try wmaker.
>
Fully agreed. That is also what is actually tried to accomplish with
WMLive as the primary objective. I would like t
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 12:14:30 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>
> About including default dock apps in distros, I think it can be
> tricky because everyone prefers different dockapps. (For example,
> I'd add wmnd to control network interfaces.) If some default set is
> included then they should be
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Paul Seelig wrote:
On 02/18/2012 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
- change the behaviour of the "About GNUStep" button, and pick there the
configuration (one free space for a dock)
+1
Using the primary dock button for launching WPrefs shold definitely be
the overall defa
I
On 18-02-2012 12:18, Paul Seelig wrote:
On 02/18/2012 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
- change the behaviour of the "About GNUStep" button, and pick there the
configuration (one free space for a dock)
I agree. Always found the about GNUStep button useless.
+1
Using the primary dock but
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 at 19:21:54 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 18.02.2012 19:11, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote:
> >
> >
> >The function wShowGNUstepPanel can be removed?
> >
> >
> No, I don't think so. People may have old desktops with this button
> and behaviour. It would be a regression.
Yes,
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 at 19:11:31 +0100, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Carlos R. Mafra escribió:
>
> > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 at 17:30:32 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > > On 18.02.2012 15:18, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > > >On 02/18/2012 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > > >>- ch
On 18.02.2012 19:11, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote:
The function wShowGNUstepPanel can be removed?
No, I don't think so. People may have old desktops with this button and
behaviour. It would be a regression.
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscr...@lists.windowmaker.org.
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, Carlos R. Mafra escribió:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 at 17:30:32 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > On 18.02.2012 15:18, Paul Seelig wrote:
> > >On 02/18/2012 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > >>- change the behaviour of the "About GNUStep" button, and pick there the
> > >>conf
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 at 17:30:32 +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 18.02.2012 15:18, Paul Seelig wrote:
> >On 02/18/2012 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> >>- change the behaviour of the "About GNUStep" button, and pick there the
> >>configuration (one free space for a dock)
> >>
> >+1
> >
> >Us
On 18.02.2012 17:30, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 18.02.2012 15:18, Paul Seelig wrote:
On 02/18/2012 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
- change the behaviour of the "About GNUStep" button, and pick there
the
configuration (one free space for a dock)
+1
Using the primary dock button for launch
On 18.02.2012 15:18, Paul Seelig wrote:
On 02/18/2012 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
- change the behaviour of the "About GNUStep" button, and pick there the
configuration (one free space for a dock)
+1
Using the primary dock button for launching WPrefs shold definitely be
the overall defa
On 02/18/2012 12:23 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> - change the behaviour of the "About GNUStep" button, and pick there the
> configuration (one free space for a dock)
>
+1
Using the primary dock button for launching WPrefs shold definitely be
the overall default already on source code level! This
19 matches
Mail list logo
