Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-10 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 at 18:38:13 +0100, Martin Dietze wrote: I've appended a modified index.html and header.css to this file. The main idea is that the header image should at least in a limited interval grow and shrink with the browser width. This can be accomplished with good old tables, as

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-07 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 at 11:26:23 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:20:30 +0100, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: On 05/02/12 14:18, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 at 13:13:08 +, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: http://repo.or.cz/w/whome.git The source there does not

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-07 Thread Martin Dietze
On Tue, February 07, 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: I think a new icon in the dock where we put Themes from users would be nice too, no? Does anybody volunteer to do that? :-) I can surely contribute some themes and snapshots (need to be home for that, might not be today). Ideally we should also

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-07 Thread Martin Dietze
On Tue, February 07, 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: Yeah, do whatever you feel is better. The biggest problem for me would be to actually write a php file displaying screenshots and all that, so if you (or anyone else) feel like doing that too, that will be great. Should in principle not be

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-07 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 at 13:13:07 +0100, Martin Dietze wrote: On Tue, February 07, 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: Yeah, do whatever you feel is better. The biggest problem for me would be to actually write a php file displaying screenshots and all that, so if you (or anyone else) feel

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-05 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
On 05/02/12 14:18, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 at 13:13:08 +, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: http://repo.or.cz/w/whome.git The source there does not correspond to what you currently see at beta.windowmaker.org, as the site was not updated yet. Hi Carlos, please, don't

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-04 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 at 21:00:07 +0100, Martin Dietze wrote: On Sat, February 04, 2012, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote: Probably the horizontal size shouldn't be fixed. +1 For a rather simple layout like this one this is an advantage that should not be sacrificed without trouble. Any idea

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-03 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 at 5:13:32 +0800, Paul Harris wrote: My review: I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the actual build of the website. It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't click the News button, and then bookmark the site,

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-03 Thread Paul Harris
On 3 February 2012 20:01, Carlos R. Mafra crma...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 at 5:13:32 +0800, Paul Harris wrote: My review: I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the actual build of the website. It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-03 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 at 22:48:38 +0800, Paul Harris wrote: keep it simple, That's an argument to use frames, actually. At least for someone with little web design knowledge as myself. I did what I was capable of doing with the limited time I have, and the result is on beta.windowmaker.org.

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-03 Thread Paul Harris
On 4 February 2012 06:47, Carlos R. Mafra crma...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 at 5:13:32 +0800, Paul Harris wrote: It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't click the News button, and then bookmark the site, because the URL doesn't change at the

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-02 Thread Paul Harris
My review: I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the actual build of the website. It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't click the News button, and then bookmark the site, because the URL doesn't change at the top), The frame sizing is

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-02 Thread Rodolfo kix Garcia
I don't like frames too. On 02/02/12 22:13, Paul Harris wrote: My review: I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the actual build of the website. It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't click the News button, and then bookmark the

Re: Re-Redeveloped Website

2012-02-02 Thread Haroldo Gambini Santos
Yes, remove frames, please. To provide an always visible dock at left you could replicate the dock bar in all sub-pages. If you generate these pages automatically (e.g. using a shell/C program which combines HTML parts) this will not be a problem. For me a webpage is well written when even