On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 at 18:38:13 +0100, Martin Dietze wrote:
I've appended a modified index.html and header.css to this file.
The main idea is that the header image should at least in a
limited interval grow and shrink with the browser width. This
can be accomplished with good old tables, as
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 at 11:26:23 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:20:30 +0100, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
On 05/02/12 14:18, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 at 13:13:08 +, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
http://repo.or.cz/w/whome.git
The source there does not
On Tue, February 07, 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
I think a new icon in the dock where we put Themes from users would
be nice too, no? Does anybody volunteer to do that? :-)
I can surely contribute some themes and snapshots (need to be
home for that, might not be today). Ideally we should also
On Tue, February 07, 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
Yeah, do whatever you feel is better. The biggest problem
for me would be to actually write a php file displaying
screenshots and all that, so if you (or anyone else) feel
like doing that too, that will be great.
Should in principle not be
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 at 13:13:07 +0100, Martin Dietze wrote:
On Tue, February 07, 2012, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
Yeah, do whatever you feel is better. The biggest problem
for me would be to actually write a php file displaying
screenshots and all that, so if you (or anyone else) feel
On 05/02/12 14:18, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 at 13:13:08 +, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
http://repo.or.cz/w/whome.git
The source there does not correspond to what you currently see
at beta.windowmaker.org, as the site was not updated yet.
Hi Carlos,
please, don't
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 at 21:00:07 +0100, Martin Dietze wrote:
On Sat, February 04, 2012, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
Probably the horizontal size shouldn't be fixed.
+1
For a rather simple layout like this one this is an advantage
that should not be sacrificed without trouble.
Any idea
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 at 5:13:32 +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
My review:
I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the actual
build of the website.
It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't
click the News button, and then bookmark the site,
On 3 February 2012 20:01, Carlos R. Mafra crma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 at 5:13:32 +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
My review:
I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the actual
build of the website.
It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 at 22:48:38 +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
keep it simple,
That's an argument to use frames, actually. At least for someone
with little web design knowledge as myself.
I did what I was capable of doing with the limited time I have,
and the result is on beta.windowmaker.org.
On 4 February 2012 06:47, Carlos R. Mafra crma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 at 5:13:32 +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't
click the News button, and then bookmark the site, because the URL
doesn't
change at the
My review:
I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the actual
build of the website.
It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't
click the News button, and then bookmark the site, because the URL doesn't
change at the top),
The frame sizing is
I don't like frames too.
On 02/02/12 22:13, Paul Harris wrote:
My review:
I prefer the simpler look, but you'll have to start again with the
actual build of the website.
It uses frames, which is very bad in terms of navigation (eg, you can't
click the News button, and then bookmark the
Yes, remove frames, please.
To provide an always visible dock at left you could replicate the dock
bar in all sub-pages. If you generate these pages automatically (e.g.
using a shell/C program which combines HTML parts) this will not be a
problem.
For me a webpage is well written when even
14 matches
Mail list logo
