On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:08:14 +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:37:52 +0300, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
Is this something I could help with somehow?
Hi Jason,
sorry for the delay.
Feel free to make what do you like to do. There are many work.
Some things to do:
- Test
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:37:52 +0300, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
Is this something I could help with somehow?
Hi Jason,
sorry for the delay.
Feel free to make what do you like to do. There are many work.
Some things to do:
- Test the debian packages
- Try to solve some lintian problems
- But
On 08/11/2011 04:53 PM, Juan Fco. Giordana wrote:
On 08/07/2011 01:00 AM, Jason Brower wrote:
I feel there could be a vast number of improvements in windowmaker
because of technologies that didn't exist are not common place.
What would you say is the general direction of WindowMaker in terms of
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 at 10:53:54 -0300, Juan Fco. Giordana wrote:
> Feature:
>
> * windowmaker-0.94.0
>
> What do you think about doing this as the first step and rename
> wmaker-crm to windowmaker-0.94.0? Carlos?
If the name change happens, it would make sense to tag the current
#master branch t
On 08/07/2011 01:00 AM, Jason Brower wrote:
I feel there could be a vast number of improvements in windowmaker
because of technologies that didn't exist are not common place.
What would you say is the general direction of WindowMaker in terms of
this forked development.
If you like, I would love
On 10.08.2011 15:10, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
[snip]
there are about 186 bugs opened now [1]. The process of close them is
very hard. Probably should be a good idea (if is mine, is good not? :-P)
create a "mini-team" to do that, because only one person cann't do it
I can help you triage them,
Is this something I could help with somehow?
On 10 Aug 2011 16:10, "Rodolfo kix Garcia" wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:58:35 -0400, Brad Jorsch wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:09:51AM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>>>
>>> good question, what we do with the wmaker debian package :-?
>>>
>>
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:58:35 -0400, Brad Jorsch wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:09:51AM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
good question, what we do with the wmaker debian package :-?
Probably is better drop the package, create a new one
(wmaker-crm??), make wmaker an empty package and depends
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:09:51AM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
> good question, what we do with the wmaker debian package :-?
>
> Probably is better drop the package, create a new one
> (wmaker-crm??), make wmaker an empty package and depends on
> wmaker-crm. And, in the future, move wmake
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:18:39 -0400, Brad Jorsch wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:01:42PM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
#37050 [n| | ] [wmaker] wmaker-gnome: Gnome panel hides the icons
#312287 [n| | ] [wmaker] wmaker fails to start with gnome
#19 [i| | ] [wmaker] gnome-session: br
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:01:42PM +0200, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
>
> #37050 [n| | ] [wmaker] wmaker-gnome: Gnome panel hides the icons
> #312287 [n| | ] [wmaker] wmaker fails to start with gnome
> #19 [i| | ] [wmaker] gnome-session: broken default behaviour
> on session end
> #283610
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:00:05 -0400, Brad Jorsch wrote:
There is a difference between a window manager and a desktop
environment. Window Maker is traditionally the former.
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 01:59:24PM +0300, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
* There is currently nothing to handle notifications. I
There is a difference between a window manager and a desktop
environment. Window Maker is traditionally the former.
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 01:59:24PM +0300, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
>
> * There is currently nothing to handle notifications. I would like to see
> something more unified with other
begin quoting Jason (spot) Brower as of Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 01:59:24PM +0300:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
[snip]
> > What do you think windowmaker should do that is not currently doing?
> >
> >
> * There is currently nothing to handle notifications. I would like to
On 08.08.2011 12:59, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
[snip]
* Icons are not very scalable nor is there SVG support for icons. (At
least that I know of)
I tried to implement it once, but the code I produced depended on a lot
of other stuff, so I quit this experiment. I think I have the code
somewh
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 at 13:59:24 +0300, Jason (spot) Brower wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 at 7:00:35 +0300, Jason Brower wrote:
> > > I feel there could be a vast number of improvements in windowmaker
> > > because of technologies that d
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 at 7:00:35 +0300, Jason Brower wrote:
> > I feel there could be a vast number of improvements in windowmaker
> > because of technologies that didn't exist are not common place.
>
> What do you think windowmaker should d
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 at 7:00:35 +0300, Jason Brower wrote:
> I feel there could be a vast number of improvements in windowmaker
> because of technologies that didn't exist are not common place.
What do you think windowmaker should do that is not currently doing?
> What would you say is the genera
I feel there could be a vast number of improvements in windowmaker
because of technologies that didn't exist are not common place.
What would you say is the general direction of WindowMaker in terms of
this forked development.
If you like, I would love to see a list of things that are improved ov
19 matches
Mail list logo
