Hi Jon,
On 14.12.2012 01:32, Jon Goldberg wrote:
I just inherited a new client whose workstations have users logged in as
local administrators; the net result is a ton of crapware.
Yes this is what usually happens.
I considered creating wpkg packages for the crapware with only a
remove
Hi Paul,
On 14.12.2012 09:47, Paul McGrath wrote:
Instead of the remove we use install (execute once) to remove some
crapware. Usually Bing, Ask and Google toolbars. We get a lot of Samsung laptops and they are
choked full of crapware but I haven't got around to building anything
Hi Malte,
On 09.10.2012 14:14, Malte Starostik wrote:
Example usage:
check type=wmi condition=exists
path=Win32_QuickFixEngineering.HotFixID='KB976902',ServicePackInEffect=''/
One obvious enhancement would be to a condition that allows for path to
contain a complete WQL query. But before
Hi Andrew,
On 10.10.2012 18:56, Andrew Struiksma wrote:
I've been trying to figure out a way to allow end users to trigger WPKG to run
when it is convenient to them. Ideally we could setup a shortcut on everyone's
Start menu so that they could click Install Updates which would
start wpkg.js.
Hi Andrew,
On 10.10.2012 20:05, Andrew Struiksma wrote:
I've been doing some research on SubInACL.exe and it appears to be
designed for use with Win XP/Server 2003. The recommendations I saw on
the forums was to migrate to icacls.exe. Do you have any info on this?
Well yes, it might be
Hi Carlos,
I might shed some light on this topic. Although I currently don't have time for
in-dept explanation/analysis.
On 06.09.2012 20:08, Carlos R. Pasqualini wrote:
2012-09-06 14:43:53, INFO: Installing 'LibreOffice' (libreoffice)...
So WPKG is going to verify (check,
Hi Steve,
On 11.09.2012 12:37, Steve Kersley wrote:
Is it possible to set a variable in the parent ‘stub’ package that can then be
accessed in the child packages?
My testing suggests not. Setting JAVA_VERSION in the parent package isn’t
accessible from the child packages - unless I’m doing
Hello,
On 11.09.2012 14:14, jurgen.depic...@let.be wrote:
I have a problem comparable to the libreoffice problem from this morning.
I think it's unrelated. (apart that you're both comparing version strings).
2012-09-11 14:00:02, DEBUG : Comparing version fragments: '4' = ''
2012-09-11
Hi Malte,
On 05.09.2012 13:00, Malte Hohmann wrote:
I am not sure if WPKG updates the environment at all. It saves and restores its
environment during processing of any package - at least this is logged in the
output - so I think it just stores its environment variables somewhere and
reloads
Hi Jürgen,
On 28.08.2012 15:44, jurgen.depic...@let.be wrote:
I was wondering how you exluded the flashplayer activex, since you wrote on
http://lists.wpkg.org/pipermail/wpkg-users/2011-November/008252.htmlthat you
were against this non-feature ;-).
I am using independent packages to deploy
Hi Stefan,
On 28.08.2012 15:51, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Am 28.08.2012 15:44, schrieb jurgen.depic...@let.be:
I think he used something like the code below.
One could as well check the installed IE release.
'---code start (watch for line wraps)
profile id='CommonTools'
package
Hello,
Actually I have decided today to spend some time on Windows 8 migration today. I
try to just report my results without any intention to start a war about user
interface discussions. So if you're going to reply please focus on technical
discussion of issues.
Here's a summary of my
Hi Kyle,
On 24.08.2012 02:33, Kyle Bakker wrote:
Could not Process (install) package '.Net Framework v4.5'
Exit code returned non-successful value (-1) on command dotnetfx45.exe /q
/norestart /lang:ENU (I added the lang:ENU after reading a solution on a forum
but it did not work)
Now if I run
Hi Hamza
On 31.07.2012 11:48, Hamza K. wrote:
with versiongreaterorequal i cant remove my packages he does nothing.
Let's see...
Package:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
packages
...
check type='uninstall' condition='versiongreaterorequal'
path='Unlocker %VERSION%'
Hi Cedric,
On 02.07.2012 13:34, Cedric Frayssinet wrote:
With wpkg.js 1.3, the first line of wpkg.xml is like :
wpkg:wpkg xmlns:wpkg=http://www.wpkg.org/settings; hostname=info103-069677
ipadresses=172.16.129.154.
But, when this computer is used as master in order to clone a lot of
Hi David,
On 01.06.2012 08:58, David Petterson wrote:
What I want to do is to check if the 32-bit version of Java has been
installed on 64-bit Windows 7.
Is there a better way to do this? uninstall only checks for 64 bit apps
(on 64-bit os), or will it check for both?
It will of course check
Hi David,
On 31.05.2012 15:10, David Petterson wrote:
Is is it possible to use regex in the path for registry checks?
ex:
check architecture=x64 type=registry condition=equals
Hi Carl,
On 25.05.2012 16:16, Carl van Eijk wrote:
I've noticed that application of all profiles fail if there is a reference to
just one non existent profile.
...
Even though neither wbl_uk_computers nor wbl00379 exist, I still want test
to apply.
How do I go about this?
In fact a host
Hi Mike,
On 21.05.2012 13:26, Mike Burgener wrote:
Has nobody any idea on this?
Maybe you could post a full debug log from one of the machines where it
obviously does not update properly and a full listing of the XML defining the
package.
Very likely WPKG does not execute the upgrade
Hi Marco,
On 15.05.2012 09:45, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
If network 192.168.1.0/24 then SOFTWARE=\\192.168.1.x\wpkg\software
If network 192.168.2.0/24 then SOFTWARE=\\192.168.2.x\\wpkg\software
I'm a bit curious. How do you check network address with cmd? I've
googled around a bit, but...
Using
Hi Paul,
On 15.05.2012 10:40, Paul McGrath wrote:
So far I have just used ‘.’ (dots, full stops, periods!) to denote version
variables. Is it possible to use ‘_’ (underscores) e.g.
variable name=version value=11_1_102_55/
If the version is incremented then will upgrade work based on a value
Hi Semián,
On 15.05.2012 15:41, Semián Matěj wrote:
It does not work for version checks.. So be avare of this in your scripts.
Log:
File version check for file
'H:\WINDOWS\System32\Macromed\Flash\Flash32_11_2_202_235.ocx' returned false for
operation type versiongreaterorequal.
Checking file
Hi Donny,
On 14.05.2012 18:14, Donny Brooks wrote:
I understand. So what I was thinking of doing with the clients still going back
to the centralized wpkg server for configs but pulling software from local
servers should work if I read correctly. I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't
mess
Hi Sebastian,
On 16.04.2012 16:06, Sebastian Elsner wrote:
using the foobar2000 package from the wiki (http://wpkg.org/Foobar2000) I had a
strange problem. After removing the package from the profile, wpkg.js reported
that the package could not be removed. But all the files were uninstalled
Hi Neil,
On 16.04.2012 20:20, neilr8133 wrote:
Trying to figure out a few things about the downloading capabilities and
whether I'm experiencing a bug in the code or if it's a PEBKAC error.
1) When using thedownload directive, it seems that the target folder is
always rooted at %TMP% ? I
Hi Calvin,
On 10.04.2012 15:50, calvin chan wrote:
Hi, I am new to WPKG. I would like to check if anyone could let me
know where to find the source code for the WPKG1.3-bin.zip?
Latest version of the stable WPKG code can always be found on SVN.
The server component can be browsed here for
Hi Stefan,
On 06.04.2012 21:04, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Since managing shortcuts is an essential part of deploying software on Windows,
I offer to create a JS script to be included in the tools folder of the
distribution.
You are right. I am using shortcut.exe tool right now but using some
Hi Heiko,
On 05.04.2012 08:17, heiko.hel...@horiba.com wrote:
Does WPKG handle multiple versions of the same package of is this planned. It's
a corner case - for example Vmware Infrastructure Client installs different
versions all having the same DisplayName. So if you manage 4.1 and 5.0
Hi Peter,
On 05.04.2012 00:37, Peter Beck wrote:
I am just creating a package for MS Business Contact Manager (BCM). BCM depends
on MS Outlook. I'd like to add these dependencies, but there are different
office 2010 versions - how can I check if _one of them_ is installed ?
something like the
Hi Mi,
On 23.02.2012 21:39, Mi wrote:
Under some circumstances, wpkg.js tries to parse non-existing .xml files, and
writes an ERROR into the log file. This is misleading in situations where it
is normal that the file does not exist.
For example, when using a packages directory of .xml files
Hi Matthew,
On 21.02.2012 11:50, Matthew Bowman wrote:
I've recently found myself in an odd situation. I recently upgraded a
package that had an exit code of -3 (Install Shield - missing info in
setup.iss file). This was not listed in the package.xml as success so
therefore wpkg was not
Hi Mikhail,
On 17.02.2012 12:04, Mikhail Joseph Salviejo wrote:
then next would be issuing the install code for the dotnet
install cmd='C:\Temporary\dotnetfx40.exe /passive /norestart' /
the installation remains at this part whenever i check the log file
Make sure you're using the full
Hi Malte,
I unpacked that dotnetfx40.exe with 7-zip into %SOFTWARE%\dotnet4\ which
extracts among other things the real setup.exe. That one I then call as:
%SOFTWARE%\dotnet4\setup.exe /q /norestart /x86 /x64
This not only saves a little time for the initial extraction phase which is
now only
Hi Malte,
On 16.02.2012 11:36, Malte Hohmann wrote:
Hi all,
I have come across an issue with the conditional execution of a command:
I have the following package where the installation works, but removal does not
due to environment variables not expanded in the conditional check:
...
Hi David,
On 08.02.2012 13:12, David Petterson wrote:
Doesnt WPKG have some kind of validation built in with the latest version?
WPKG 1.3 comes with XSD files which can be used to validate your XML files
syntactically. If you want to test it, just run WPKG on a test host. Or run some
WPKG
Hi Urs,
On 30.01.2012 10:04, Urs Rau (UK) wrote:
I got xml validation working using the xsd files for all other wpkg xml files,
but am not able to figure out the correct syntax for the config.xml file to get
validation working.
I found that I've never completed config.xsd and the param
Hi,
On 26.01.2012 14:32, Malte Starostik wrote:
assuming agent == service, that service itself does not lock the file. If
anything does, it's wpkg.js. Thus, if you configure the service to execute a
batch file containing the above as a post-execute script, you should be all
set.
This is
Hi Ronny,
On 26.01.2012 18:58, Ronny wrote:
does someone else know why the variable isn't overriden by the profile-assigned
variable and it is still using the package-assigned variable? I don't find the
reason.
Initially this was changed intentionally for WPKG 1.3.0 since variable expansion
Hi Stefan,
On 26.01.2012 22:29, Stefan Pendl wrote:
With this change, this user is now facing the same problem, but in the opposite
way.
We have already two users facing the issue of changed variable expansion order:
- Ronny
- Kalyniak Oleksandr
Both are likely not facing the same issue in
Hi Ronny,
On 26.01.2012 23:03, Ronny wrote:
this is a good news. What about a config-variable which defines the order in
which they are resolved? something like:
param name='VariableResolveOrder' value='host,profile,package' /
or at least something like param name='OverrideVariablesBy'
Hi Ronny,
I took a look at the named topic. So the current order for variables in 1.3.0
is: Host, Profile, Package
Host variables overriding profile variables overriding package variables.
I guess every package and host has to be assigned to a profile. Variables are
mostly *used* in
Hi Ronny,
On 26.01.2012 23:39, Ronny wrote:
So for all wpkg-versions = 1.3.0 what about this example:
profile id=general
variable name='MyVariable' value='general' /
package package-id=abc /
{...}
package package-id=xyz /
/profile
profile id=special
variable name='MyVariable' value='special'
Hi,
On 12.01.2012 13:50, Stefan Pendl wrote:
There is a bug in WSH which crashes it if there is too much output to the
console window.
It does not crash but just stall; so the process appears frozen. And just to
answer before anybody asks. There seems to be no way to flush the buffers
Hi Cedric,
On 10.01.2012 18:13, Cedric Frayssinet wrote:
I've a little problem with a package. This is a french software, named Risbee :
http://www.pob-technology.com/upload/softwares/risbee-3.1.0-setup.exe
This is a NSIS package, and my classic XML is :
package
id=Risbee
Hi Marco,
On 10.01.2012 18:49, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
Some other trigger a disinstallation of previous version and an
installation of the newer ones, while the disinstallation suffer from
the classical ''fork'' problem of NSIS.
Symptoms are that WPKG say ''check failed after upgrade'' but
Hi Stefan/Michael,
On 09.01.2012 19:39, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 17:30, schrieb Michael MacKay:
I have a frustrating little issue. I have a program that needs to
register a plugin after it is installed. Very easy to do: DtMaxSdk.exe
/register.
My problem is, it has a little popup
Hi Michael,
On 08.01.2012 05:18, Michael MacKay wrote:
I have several packages being processed at once, 5 upgrade installs, and 3
software removals (setup as installs {msiexe /x} as they weren't installed with
WPKG). The installs work (although they seem to continue after the client
progress
Hi Michael,
On 06.01.2012 00:03, Michael MacKay wrote:
I have 10 locations I am using WPKG with and use some syncing software to deploy
the WPKG directory to all the locations. Currently, I have the WPKG Clients on
each workstation have the %SOFTWARE% location variable and wpkg.js directed to
Hi Stefan,
On 21.12.2011 11:45, Stefan Pendl wrote:
If you still want to use just one single profile, but exclude one package from
one host you can use the conditions introduced with WPKG v1.3.0
Oh, just noticed that one of my answers did not hit the list as Bruno answered
to me directly and
Hi Michael,
On 21.12.2011 23:01, Michael MacKay wrote:
I am trying to deploy a patch for some custom software supplied by our parent
company. They send it as an .exe (no silent option), which I extract it, it is
basically a batch scripted update. I can run the batch file on a workstation and
it
Hi,
On 20.12.2011 15:57, Bruno CHOQUET wrote:
I have already done. But it 's complicate because i have two profiles :
- one profile with 29 tools for TOTO computer (without Foxit)
- one profile with 30 tools for ALL OTHER COMPUTERS
But, when i add, change, remove a package, i must to change
Hi Daniel,
On 09.12.2011 16:29, Daniel Rickenbacher wrote:
I got the 'settings_file_path' set in the config.xml to '%SystemRoot%'.
This worked with 1.1.2, but now while testing 1.3 it doesn't work anymore.
When I set it by commandline switch it works like a charm.
Seems as if wpkg does not
Hi,
On 09.12.2011 17:03, Rainer Meier wrote:
You might just have discovered a bug. Handling of settings file has been changed
mainly to support patterns to include hostname or profile names in the file
name. Due to this it looks like expanding environment variables in settings file
name or path
1.2.0 release:
===
= CHANGES FOR 1.3 release
===
Change notes
WPKG Version: 1.3.0
Author: : Rainer Meier skybeam
Hi Stefan,
On 08.12.2011 16:04, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Thank you for that great release ;-D
Many thanks to you as well, you've done a tremendous job in testing and
debugging WPKG 1.3.0!
br,
Rainer
-
wpkg-users mailing
Hi Stefan,
On 08.12.2011 16:24, Stefan Pendl wrote:
I just noticed that the legend section of all XML specifications include
consists only of the AusAddress topic, which is not part of WPKG, if I am not
mistaken.
Is this by design, an oversight or included by default by maven?
Having a very
Hi Joe,
On 05.12.2011 20:18, Joe wrote:
So a 32 bit client running under windows 64 bit on 64 bit hardware
detects as 32 bit?
Yes it does. And yes, it is correct bahavior from WPKG point of view. The reason
is that in case WPKG (WSH script) runs in 32-bit WSH interpreter, then it has no
Hi Anthony,
On 28.11.2011 10:54, Anthony Walters wrote:
My issue is with the virtualbox installer, Virtualbox resets the network
inetrfaces on install[1] and so wpkg.js stops executing immediately after
virtualbox is installed. From the log below, Virtualbox returns a status of
zero, so the
Hi Stefan,
On 25.11.2011 11:05, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Installation went smooth too, only Win2k had a hick-up and hang on
installing JRE1.6, package and log attached.
Do you have any indication that your JRE 1.6 install hiccup was related to the
WPKG XML-reader changes? As I see from the logs
Hi Chris,
On 23.11.2011 22:09, Chris Mortimer wrote:
Thanks for your reply. All makes sense apart from
'The exception being
upgrades to packages scheduled for removal and then maybe (?) upgrades to their
dependencies.'
sorry, not sure I follow this bit. Do you mean that if a package has been
Hi Alan,
On 21.11.2011 18:19, Alan Adams wrote:
This is a problem for me as well. i had a massive problem after I made
a typo in the script for Google Earth. I had to remove the package as
it was failing to install, and rebooting each time. Now it tries to
uninstall, then reboots, then tries to
Hi Jonathan,
On 21.11.2011 12:33, VERDEYEN Jonathan wrote:
I am setting-up WPKG for our company and have cases where I have empty remove
commands which seems to be a problem when I remove packages as it will think the
uninstall failed when doing the install checks.
WPKG does not have
Hi Stefan,
On 18.11.2011 00:49, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Is it possible to include a dependency in the XSD files for checks which require
a value attribute.
For this purpose I've defined specialized types derived from the check type.
Try specifying xsi:type='checkFile' to specify the
Hi Stefan,
On 18.11.2011 01:23, Stefan Pendl wrote:
So I will have to test once more, since I thought I encountered this situation
and the file passed validation with a missing value attribute for a version
check of an uninstall check.
You are right about uninstall checks. The XSD allows you
Hi Joe,
On 16.11.2011 15:28, Joe wrote:
I have a profile with a dozen or so packages. Now I need that same profile
without one of the packages. It appears there was work on an exclude clause
but it doesn't appear to have been implemented. Is there an easy way to exclude
a package without
Hi Steve,
On 14.11.2011 14:13, Steve Kersley wrote:
As part of a revamp of some of my wpkg scripts, I want to move towards a model
where I can use one package definition to install different versions of the
application in order to test and/or perform staged installations of a new
version by
Hi Simon,
On 11.11.2011 14:34, simon.be...@institutsmq.qc.ca wrote:
Hi,
Working with I'm trying to separate packages that belongs to either Windows XP
or Windows 7.
I packages.xml I add this line::
package
os=windows xp
id=Java1.6.0_15
(...)
but it does not work. no info at all in debug.
I
Hi Stefan,
On 30.10.2011 19:06, Stefan Pendl wrote:
I know that in C you are advised to convert file time to system time to work
around the DST problem, see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms724290%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
This here might be quite a comprehensive description
On 30.10.2011 20:46, Stefan Pendl wrote:
I think the whole world should get rid of DST, since it does no good at all.
Word!
Actually it even does not serve its initial purpose of saving energy.
br,
Rainer
-
wpkg-users
Hi Stefan,
On 29.10.2011 23:06, Stefan Pendl wrote:
I don't even think that any checks other than for host information are used
currently, but then I am just one user out of many.
But as WPKG supports it this limitation should be known to users. However I am
thinking about a possibility to
Hi,
On 27.10.2011 12:54, jurgen.depic...@let.be wrote:
I'm trying out RC38 and it simply doesn't work, although I have no issues for
the 1.2 release (note: the 'test' profile uses a package which only works for
the RC release).
Wpkg.js cannot find the profiles, although it does find them ;-).
Hi Jürgen,
On 27.10.2011 14:48, jurgen.depic...@let.be wrote:
It happens on W7x64 also...
Confirmed. I will commit a fix today. This bug will occur always when multiple
profiles are assigned to one host. Looks like I did not test this - shame on me.
If you want to continue before I commit
Hi,
On 27.10.2011 15:21, Rainer Meier wrote:
Hi Jürgen,
On 27.10.2011 14:48, jurgen.depic...@let.be wrote:
It happens on W7x64 also...
Confirmed. I will commit a fix today. This bug will occur always when multiple
profiles are assigned to one host. Looks like I did not test this - shame
Hi Stefan,
On 26.10.2011 14:44, Stefan Pendl wrote:
I think wpkg.js is sending its output to StdError so you need to redirect that
too.
It's using STDOUT for console output (respectively the WScript.Echo() function.
But it's generally a good idea to redirect STDERR as well using 21.
In
Hi Stefan,
On 22.10.2011 14:45, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Sorry, but the recent changes to the variable handling have reintroduced the
empty variable issue.
Re-fixed in 1.2.1-RC31 just committed. Issue seems to be limited to Windows XP.
I did not apply your patch as it introduced an invalid scope
to be static during one run and therefore I am caching the values.
It seems I forgot to invalidate the host information cache after reading the
values from settings.
Changes 2011-10-22, v1.2.1-RC32 by Rainer Meier r.meier (at) wpkg.org
FIX: Fixed use of host attributes read from settings file in remote
Hi Stefan,
On 22.10.2011 17:23, Stefan Pendl wrote:
There still seems to be something wrong with the package application during a
query.
Something is a bit too unprecise... However I found that /query:l did show now
the remote information as read from the settings file. This is fixed in
-RC34 by Rainer Meier r.meier (at) wpkg.org
FIX: If executed in remote query mode WPKG failed if there was no profile
assigned to the host executing WPKG (the remote host).
Initialization of debug messages about assigned profiles has been delayed
and for queries this information
Hi Stefan,
On 23.10.2011 01:58, Stefan Pendl wrote:
condition
check type=logical condition=not
check type=host condition=hostname value=SATELLITE/
/check
check type=logical condition=not
check type=host condition=os value=5\.0\.\d{4}/
/check
/condition
Now
Hi Stefan,
On 23.10.2011 02:17, Rainer Meier wrote:
Looking at the code the logical not check allows only one single check
sub-node. However the XSD allows to specify as many check sub-nodes as you want.
Well; I think I am going to extend the code to assume an implicit and when
multiple sub
Hi Kai,
On 21.10.2011 18:14, Kai Pastor wrote:
Hello,
I am testing WPKG 1.2.1-RC27 and have not seen any problems. Thank you very much
for your work.
Great news.
So far I have also used WPKG Create Report which is linked on the download page.
This useful tool is not yet aware of the new
Hi Stefan,
On 21.10.2011 20:39, Stefan Pendl wrote:
There is no easy solution for this yet.
You can specify a server-side copy of the local database of any client for
examination by using the /config:path switch to a
config.xml file, which only contains the settings_file_name and
Hi Stefan,
On 21.10.2011 20:22, Stefan Pendl wrote:
The order of variable evaluation is as follows:
1) package variables
2) profile variables
3) host variables
Now this is clearly defined:
- WPKG reads all host variables applying to the current host
- WPKG reads all profile variables
Hi again,
On 21.10.2011 20:53, Rainer Meier wrote:
E.g. before reading the package
HOST: SOFTWARE
SETTINGS
VAR1
VAR2
PROFILE: VAR3
VAR4
Then a package which replaces SOFTWARE:
HOST: SETTINGS
VAR1
VAR2
PROFILE: VAR3
VAR4
PACKAGE: SOFTWARE
Then WPKG starts to evaluate the variables. So as you
Hi Keith,
On 22.10.2011 01:47, k.e.jo...@brighton.ac.uk wrote:
Thanks, I will deliver debug logs if it looks like something genuinely buggy. I don't
think it's more than something stupid my end. I just wanted to check if there was a
behavioural change that I'd missed in the v1.2 upgrade
Hello again,
On 22.10.2011 01:37, Rainer Meier wrote:
I've implemented /query:s and /query:l to query these tags from the (l)ocal host
or the (s)ettings database and print it on screen. So a reporting tool could
point it to a settings file using /settings:path /query:s to fetch all host
Hi both,
On 20.10.2011 21:12, Stefan Pendl wrote:
OK, so I think I know what the problem is.
I think you're right ;)
The fix took a bit more changes than I initially thought but I've introduced
some improvements as well. Especially the debug log will now also print the
variables in order
Hi Keith,
On 21.10.2011 00:15, k.e.jo...@brighton.ac.uk wrote:
Long time no see. I've just implementing some upgrades to our systems and I'm
testing v1.2 at last (Woo Hoo!). It looks brilliant but I'm not sure whether
the changes I've seen are due to my own setup or not. I changed the root
Hi Stefan.
On 16.10.2011 16:43, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Thanks for fixing, will test in a few minutes.
Great, there have been many fixes and improvements recently which need a bit
more in-depth testing I guess. The change log for version 1.2.1 clearly shows
that it's much more than just
Hi Stefan,
On 16.10.2011 18:56, Stefan Pendl wrote:
In addition this syntax will allow to shorten the lines of the posted examples
at the wiki, so it gets more readable.
I have just implemented more flexibility. Hopefully users will not be too
confused. BUt the templates and installer
Hi Stefan,
On 16.10.2011 23:09, Stefan Pendl wrote:
I have done some excessive testing by removing all packages from my test
systems and reapplying them.
Many many thanks for extensive testing. We really need skilled test resources.
The more features WPKG implements the more possibilities
Hi MI,
On 11.10.2011 22:50, MI wrote:
Is there any way to use the value of the revision attribute inside a package
definition?
I tried things like variable name=myvar value=%revision% /, without
success.
What I'm after is a way to use things like
install cmd=reg add HKLM\software\mykey /v
Hi MI,
On 09.10.2011 18:50, MI wrote:
I started using wpkg, after I had most software already installed on the
machines.
When I create a package, it doesn't seem to be applied, because the check
condition (for example uninstall for Thunderbird x.y.z) returns true.
Actually you seem to check
Hi Heiko,
On 21.09.2011 15:40, heiko.hel...@horiba.com wrote:
fixed it - at least this works - I don't really speak Jscript :)
I can confirm that this at least was a bug in 1.2.1-RC20. I am currently working
on some larger enhancements. Unfortunately I am running short on resources which
Hi Stefan,
On 16.09.2011 21:37, Stefan Pendl wrote:
Corrected my packages today and all is well, thanks for the inheritance ;-D
Nucular, the word spells n-u-c-u-l-a-r ;)
Now there is a huge pile of package-optimization in front of me due to
the recently added functionality.
I feel really
Hi Stefan,
On 15.09.2011 20:51, Stefan Pendl wrote:
I have done some testing and it seems to work as expected.
Great.
It would still be great, if one could use a server-side wpkg.xml file
to check against, which would be supplied by a command line option.
Did you try the
Hi Heiko,
On 15.09.2011 16:24, heiko.hel...@horiba.com wrote:
When using wpkg.js (1.2.1-RC18) with /debug switch (specifically, /debug
/noreboot /nonotify), then there's no output to the console any more.
Is this a bug or did I miss a change?
It was a bug. Fixed in 1.2.1-RC19:
Hi Stefan,
On 15.09.2011 19:59, Stefan Pendl wrote:
I have the following package commands:
install inherit=remove/
install cmd='MsiExec.exe /passive /norestart /log
%TMP%\%JH_PKG_NAME%.log /i %JH_PKG_MSI%' /
upgrade inherit=install/
remove cmd='MsiExec.exe
Hi Marco,
On 13.09.2011 09:26, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
Mandi! bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.wpkg.org
In chel di` si favelave...
Only a little note for the changelog:
upgrade include=include /
This is a typo. ;)
Shit, a bug in the change log ;-)
I am going to fix it.
Should read
Hi Stefan.
On 13.09.2011 12:04, Stefan Pendl wrote:
In addition there are some error messages inside wpkg.js which read
... package package
Is this intended?
No. This was not intended and potentially based on tiredness after long working
day and programming WPKG at 1:30am. I
1 - 100 of 550 matches
Mail list logo
