Mandi! Rainer Meier
In chel di` si favelave...
> However this punctuation is very uncommon (I've never seen that before). I
I will use ':' just for it's 'strangness': well suited to mark and
'internal' subrevision number...
Many thanks.
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin
Hi Marco,
Am Montag, 5. Oktober 2009 11:27:15 schrieb Marco Gaiarin:
> Mandi! Rainer Meier
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
> > This is true as well and has been introduced quite recently by a heavy
> > improvement of the version comparison algorithm.
>
> A little, probably unrelated question. T
Hi Marco,
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> A little, probably unrelated question. There's a separator defined for
> 'internal subrevision'?
> EG, for now i use, for firefox:
>
> 30141
>
> for 3.0.14 internal revision 1; i use internal revision because i'm
> human and male, so i make mistakes ;), and
Mandi! Rainer Meier
In chel di` si favelave...
> This is true as well and has been introduced quite recently by a heavy
> improvement of the version comparison algorithm.
A little, probably unrelated question. There's a separator defined for
'internal subrevision'?
EG, for now i use, for firefo
Hi Malte,
Malte Starostik wrote:
> When the revision number decreases, WPKG performs a downgrade.
This is entirely correct.
> For that to
> work, you need to add actions to your package.
This is true as well. The downgrade command has been introduced not so long ago.
I recommend using the la
Arrrghh... okay. I will bear that in mind in the future
Thanks
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Malte Starostik [mailto:ma...@malte.homeip.net]
Sent: 02 October 2009 15:56
To: wpkg-users@lists.wpkg.org
Cc: Paul McGrath
Subject: Re: [wpkg-users] revision number problem
Hi Paul,
Am
Hi Paul,
Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2009 16:42:03 schrieb Paul McGrath:
> I have discovered a revision number issue with my packages. It happened
> with Firfox.
>
> There was a security fix to Firefox 3.5.1 which I made as revision 3511 in
> my package. When 3.5.3 came out I changed my revision t
