> Unfortunately, I disagree. If we allowed any topic
> related to the Web (i.e.
> standards, design, app development, database
> engineering, systems
> integration, education, etc.) we would have an
> extremely wide brief and web
> standards would be drowned out by discussions on
> other web topics
Firstly I would like to say that the WSG list has been truly inspirational
to me and i owe it a humungously huge debt of gratitude. At least 90% of the
standards stuff i have learned has come directly from my association with
it.
I am not a member of any other list or forum any longer, I like thi
The voices are telling me that Christian Ottosson said on 5/14/2004
4:21 PM:
This is an autoresponder. I'll never see your message.
Why do you subscribe to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> then?
You just asked an autoresponder why it subscribed.
You shouldn't anthromorphize autoresponders. They hate that.
--
I didn't intend to start a civil war here over this. It is the moderators
list.
What is discussed within the confines of the list I find useful and I also
find the input provided by my other peers on the list insightful and helpful
as well.
With that said, the inside forum provides the needed fr
Russ,
I'm quite satisfied with the current guidelines, and have found the
service to be inmeasurably helpful and informative.
Please know that I'm not trying to force change, but I do object to the
implication. I'm fine with keeping it on topic, and I was simply
suggesting that a more flexible ap
James Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> That said, I *will* try, as it is the only useful browser for OS8 - 9,
> apart from Mozilla 1.0x from 2002.
I convinced a client on OS9 to upgrade from Netscape 4(!) to Netscape 7. I had
to hunt for it - the very latest version of Netscape is OSX only, but
Hi
Thanks everyone for the tips, I'll try them out and report back.
If at the end of the day the solutions don't work I'll happily hide the
stylesheets from it.. this browser is in the same basket as NN4 - not
being updated anymore and population decreasing. At least then the
content will be usa
> Maybe you should hold a poll again, I believe we sort of had one a while
> ago, to me it looked like the outcome was that most people wanted to keep
> off topic posts marked with [OT], but I could be wrong there.
The general guide for off-topic posts is to use [OT] in the subject. This
lets peop
All understood, but it is you who will have to make a decision on whether
there are more of the 'too much traffic' or 'too strict' complaints, and
from who do each of these comments come from?
Do the 'too much traffic' comments come from people that are already more
than familiar with web standard
I agree, but within reason. If the topic is related to the Web (i.e.
standards, design, app development, database engineering, systems
integration, education, etc.) then it's on point.
A more open forum will only help to facilitate, and bring attention to
"Web Standards," which has to seemlessly i
Link on csscreatorAs a perpetual student, my advice is to drop out
only if you can do so without leaving it on your records.
Potential employers do not like unfinished education even if your
reasons are valid. They will find out whether or not you include
it on your resumé.
AuntySpam
http://www.ge
Link on csscreatorTime, there is a grammatical error in the What's
New column
An "a" should be an "an"
AuntySpam
http://www.geocities.com/brewnetty/home.html
http://coastline.cccd.edu/spsd_abi_home.asp
http://brewnetty.0catch.com
http://www.getrealresults.com/tenmyths.html
From: "Hill, Tim" <[
Am 15.05.2004 um 20:36 schrieb Peter A. Shevtsov:
Michael Zeltner wrote:
but hey, you could do that with accessible flash, that would be
cleaner :)
Hey! You force visitors to install Flash player. But someone can't do
that because their internal company policy, or they just don't know
how to do
Michael Zeltner wrote:
but hey, you could do that with accessible flash, that would be
cleaner :)
Hey! You force visitors to install Flash player. But someone can't do
that because their internal company policy, or they just don't know how
to do it.
I think that image maps are more accessible.
Isn't that something of a blinkered view, Felix?
I'm sorry your prior experience with forums has been negative, yet I'm
senior mod on a very productive forum and have a team of great guys working
to help others benefit from our collective skillsets. We don't bother with
the SEO stuff; we do bother
I know, Russ! ... let's do both :o)
I have limited time in my day, as we all have, but a well considered forum
would permit topic segregation.
I deal with similar on www.gawds.org and our sibling Yahoo! list (which is
to me a complete bloody wind-up list but, as you comment, is appreciated by
man
russ - maxdesign wrote:
> Yes, we have discussed forums vs lists on several occasions. Each solution
> has positives and negatives. The general consensus is that a forum is not as
> effective for sharing and learning as a list - forums are more passive and
> people are possibly less likely to go
This is probably a good place to start:
http://www.macedition.com/cb/ie5macbugs/
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au
Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of James E
http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/ss/konq-org.png
http://www.konqueror.org/
I brought this up in a thread entitled "Source of Computed Line-Height"
on news:netscape.public.mozilla.style on April 10. The response I got
was that the line-height rule inherited from body into h1 was an
inherited computed
This is an autoresponder. I'll never see your message.
Why do you subscribe to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> then?
--
Christian Ottosson
http://christian.ottosson.name/
() ASCII Ribbon Campaign -- against HTML mail & vCards
/\ http://arc.pasp.de/
Yes, we have discussed forums vs lists on several occasions. Each solution
has positives and negatives. The general consensus is that a forum is not as
effective for sharing and learning as a list - forums are more passive and
people are possibly less likely to go there unless they have a problem.
Am 15.05.2004 um 13:54 schrieb russ - maxdesign:
We get most of our 'too much traffic' complaints in heavy post days. On
extremely heavy days we sometimes get people unsubscribe from the list
altogether.
how about getting wsg up on gmane (http://gmane.org/)? i guess you'd
have to be compatible to
Personally I think your system is perfect Russ...
I dont mind the traffic, its not a bother, I can filter topics that I
have no idea about...
And I can read through ones I love...
Its just - the AutoReponders are KILLERS...
Would it be possible to - not ban people, but temporarily suspend the
Russ,
In my view your actions are symptomatic of the rise of a Stalinist regimen
... :o)
And another thing ...
Tell you what though, a forum would be cool. We'd then have intrinsic
selectivity. You must have been through this at least 3 times ...
But I found it challenging when joining the grou
Bob,
Agreed. I now just do XHTML 1.1. There is no 'strict'; just markup.
There are countless pros and cons (like the IE xml prelude) but it's helped
me get a better understanding of the markup business.
There are times when, instead of procrastinating and arguing with the rights
and wrongs of a
If you just want to hide certain things from IE 5.2 Mac, then use
comments as shown below. You need that \ at the end onf the top
comment for it to work.
/* Hide from IE5 Mac \*/
((whatever you want to hide))
/* End Hide */
On May 15, 2004, at 01:33, James Ellis wrote:
Hi all
Having som
A note on complaints about the WSG list.
First of all, we are happy to hear your complaints, suggestions and
feedback. We try to take all feedback on-board, and address all criticisms
where possible.
However, sometimes there is no happy middle ground. For example, almost all
the complaints we rec
The voices are telling me that YoYoEtc said on 5/14/2004 5:57 PM:
So does that mean if I put "XHTML 1.0 Transitional that any code that is
of either HTML 4.0 or XHTML 1.0 will be accepted by validators?
I see my validator is presently set at HTML 4.0 Transitional so I assume
that means that the
Am 15.05.2004 um 08:52 schrieb Peter A. Shevtsov:
I do not agree about image maps. For example, you have the image of
geographical map, and you have to make so, if you click on the certain
country area, the page with information related to this country would
open. How can you provide this withou
29 matches
Mail list logo
