Phillips, Wendy wrote:
The page that opens in the new window has a number of anchor links -
this is just one of them. I've tried changing to different anchors and
the same problem occurs, unless it is the last anchor on the page and
there is no where else for the window to shift to. I can only p
lucky it's a promo :p
From: "Sean M. Hall (Dante)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images
Date: 8 Jun 2004 03:39:27 +
Hey guys. Yerba Buena Web Design (my own small design agency, which hasn't
even officially opened yet) has creat
Title: RE: [WSG] new window losing it's anchor place
Not
sure how onkeypress would interfere with other similar links on the page - the
link can be tabbed to and therefore works via keyboard only.
The
page that opens in the new window has a number of anchor links - this is just
one of them
Title: RE: [WSG] new window losing it's anchor place
Hi Wendy
1. Where is #how_work on the page?
2. You should also add onkeypress="window.open(this.href, 'popupwindow', 'toolbar=yes,location=yes,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,width=300,height=300'); return false;" just
I'm using the recommended accessible way to open a new browser window (yes, I know but
it's an elearning module and we have to link out to internal content so learners can
view reference material without losing their place, plus they are quite used to this
method).
However, I'm finding that if
On 8 Jun 2004 03:39:27 +, Sean M. Hall (Dante) wrote:
> I'd like your opinion on these two images (please remember that I'm a
> beginner at design).
Could replies to Sean on this topic please go directly to him?
Sean,
This is not a general web/ graphic design list, perhaps you'd like to
go
Title: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images
Im having trouble understanding how you think IE7
would be broken?!
I wouldnt abuse IE7 to be broken without it
actually being released yet. It might shock you ;)
Microsoft have said their putting more time and
manpower into IE7 than previous versions...
C
Title: [WSG] IE 7 Promo Images
Hey guys. Yerba Buena Web Design (my own small design agency, which hasn't even officially opened yet) has created two IE 7 Promo Images. Dean Edwards modified the first one (to fit his layout and design) and made it the official IE 7 Logo.
http://www.geocit
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:07:36 -0600, RC Pierce wrote:
> One question, though: When this table is linearized will it still
> make sense?
> => Disk Space => Bandwidth => &c.; =>
> Bronze => 400 MB => 7 GB => &c.; =>
> Silver => &c.; =>
> Gold => &c.; =>
> Platinum => &c.;
I haven't looked at the s
G'day
Well, the specs appear to have provision for it. Unfortunately the vast
majority of browsers do not (yet) seem to support it.
Content alignment in the marker box
LI:before {
display: marker;
content: "(" counter(counter,lower-a
"Indiscrepancies" = cross between "indiscretions" and "discrepancies"?
:-)
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
http://www.artgallery.nsw.gov.au
*
The discussion list for http://webs
Thats funny Mark..
I happened to hit Froogle by accident after following that link and look
what I found..
http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=min-width%20IE&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wf
Good to see Westciv in there. eh John?
Regards
Chris Blown
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 18:26, Mark Stanton wrot
Title: Ordered list mark-up
Hi guys,
I was wondering if you could tell me how to mark-up an ordered list using CSS so that the bullets are enclosed in parenthesis, e.g.
(a) Text piece 1
(b) Whatever
Thanks
Bhuvnesh Chaudhry
**
Henry,
Weird, but it works!! Thanks for helping me out. Appreciate that.
http://www.maysvillerotary.org/testindex.htm
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Henry Tapia
Sent: Tuesday, 8 June 2004 12:56
Hi
As I posted before, let's put these up on the WSG website, not on the
list. An archive would contribute better to the group and are the posts
are now tending to just take up bandwidth now on the list as we are just
getting a pile of emails with links in them.
Cheers
James
Jad Madi wrote:
win
Hi
Netscape 6 is not a stable browser, it's built off Mozilla alpha code
(i.e about 0.9) (v7 is a branch off Mozilla 1.1, I believe). There is a
thread on this topic about a month or two back with some links to the
Mozilla roadmap - try a search at mail-archive.com
The "6" was put in for Netsc
This is arguably an obsolete rule. I would posit that it does not
apply to cases in which links are contained within completely
separate block level elements (e.g. unordered lists' items). It is,
however, good practice to still use some sort of separator (pipe,
or even a non-breaking space characte
> One question, though: When this table is linearized will it still make sense?
In the case of properly coded (read: with correct table headings, scope, etc)
data tables, meaningful linearisation should be taken care of by the user agent.
Don't worry about it...this should not, in my view anyway,
One question, though: When this table is linearized will it still make sense?
If I have gathered correctly what Russ and others said in the linearization thread,
would it make
more sense to have the columnar data in the rows, and vice-versa? That way, when the
data is
linearized, it will flow as
Is there a trick that I haven't learned yet with regard to WAI Recommendation 10.5; to
wit:
10.5 Until user agents (including assistive technologies) render adjacent links
distinctly, include
non-link, printable characters (surrounded by spaces) between adjacent links.
[Priority 3]
The reason
Dan Cederholm is the author of Web Standards Solutions: The Markup and Style
Handbook as well as many articles on standards-based design for publications
such as A List Apart . Dan also runs the popular weblog SimpleBits , where
he writes articles and commentary on the web, technology and life.
Re
Hi list :)
I've got every other quirk squashed except this unordered list one.
Is there a way to reposition the unordered list while keeping the square
bullets where they're supposed to be, or will I have to fake this
with a background image? I've gotten the text to move where it's
supposed to be
Thanks
Wish I could post an example, but it's all behind a secure area at
present. Here's all the pages prior to log-in
http://iis.c-o2.net/index.aspx
Some of the pages/links you'll click on will show a few minor problems,
which do not exist in most of the other browsers.
Generally, the whole
>
> From: Martin Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2004/06/07 Mon AM 11:44:41 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
>
> Hi All
>
> Anyone got any decent pointers for Netscape 6 CSS problems? I'm
> finalising a site works great in IE6, 5.5, 5, NS7, Safari, Mozilla e
Martin,
Be careful with DocTypes.
NS6 adds white-space after objects.
Anymore than that I'd need an example url.
mike 2k:)2
-Original Message-
From: Martin Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 June 2004 16:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
Hi All
Title: RE: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
What's the problem though captain?
Jamie Mason: Design
-Original Message-
From: Martin Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 June 2004 16:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] NS6 indiscrepancies
Hi All
Anyone got any decent poi
Hi All
Anyone got any decent pointers for Netscape 6 CSS problems? I'm
finalising a site works great in IE6, 5.5, 5, NS7, Safari, Mozilla etc.
etc. However, NS6 is simply a mess.
Have scoured the web but always draw a blank.
Kind regards
Martin Chapman Fromm
--
Web development, identity and des
Hi all,
My first email to the list, just joined a couple of days ago..
Amit, that one looks like IE's rendering of a space character between li's
containing block elements ie. , when you have
white space between your s (as one would).
eg:
subitem two
subitem three
will leave a space between it
I tried to add a 'sublevel' to the exisiting lists in order to bring out
the second level.
Works fine in Opera/Win Mozilla/Win
But shows gaps in IE in the subnavlists.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks people.
URL: http://www.maysvillerotary.org/testindex.htm
CSS http://www.maysvillerotary.o
Hmmm, neither seem free though :(
http://www.browsercam.com/
http://www.vmware.com/
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Stanton
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 10:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
Just out of interest, given that Amit was asking about offline
software, Browsercam is literally a whole bunch of boxes running
different versions of OS and browsers. And it's not (really) free.
It's pretty much impossible to *accurately* simulate what browser x on
OS y is doing - to do so you
http://www.browsercam.com/
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 22:19:15 +1000, Amit Karmakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> People,
>
> My apologoes in advance if this has been discussed earlier.
>
> I know there are sites that let you test your sites on different
> browsers(browsers, version, OS).
>
> Somethi
VMware is my second bet
or Virtual PC
Camz
- Original Message -
From: "Amit Karmakar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:19 AM
Subject: [WSG] Many Browers in one place
> People,
>
> My apologoes in advance if this has been discussed earlier.
>
People,
My apologoes in advance if this has been discussed earlier.
I know there are sites that let you test your sites on different
browsers(browsers, version, OS).
Something like http://browsers.evolt.org/, www.danvine.com/iecapture/
but are there softwares (online or offline) that lets users
Title: Message
Phew, I was
completely confused until you pointed that out!
"A programming
language?!?!This wasn't in ANY of my CSS books...oh my
god"
haha
Jamie
Mason: Design
-Original Message-From: Gary Menzel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 June 2004
02:11To:
That's a good one Russ, very handy, helps build a mental picture too!
Thanks.
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Russ Weakley - Maxdesign
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 8:08 PM
To: Web Standards Group
Subj
Title: Message
Thanks
Jeff,
I
added that, it IS handy!
Regards, Amit Karmakarwww.karmakars.com
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jeff Lowder - Accessibility 1stSent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:57
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Hi everyone,
Please reply directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOT the list. If need be I'll post
relevant discussion somewhere.
At the bottom of all posts (well most as it doesn't get added when people send
horrible HTML email) there is a link to the guidelines. The link is
http://webstandardsgroup.org
Guys
Please address all issues related to the running of the list to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] We are really trying to keep the noise on this list
down to a mimimum and keep discussion to web standards related issues.
If everyone could help it would be great and the list managers
wouldn't feel so grumpy
I'd wondered at that, Pat. At first joining I was double posting.
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer ()
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Patrick Lauke
Sent: 07 June 2004 11:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
hmm seems that
things are fine with me
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:38:44 +0100, Patrick Lauke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it just me, or does it take a good quarter of an hour for emails
> to appear on the list?
>
> Patrick
>
> Patrick H. Lauke
> Webmaster / U
winsyntax
http://www.WinSyntax.com
by the way
we are having three threads today for editors :-)
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 21:38:04 +0200, Kristof Neirynck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> noa wrote:
>
> > Sean M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
> >> As I said before: syntax highlighting and no automatic inserti
Is it just me, or does it take a good quarter of an hour for emails
to appear on the list?
Patrick
Patrick H. Lauke
Webmaster / University of Salford
http://www.salford.ac.uk
*
The discussion list for http://webst
Well said, mate. There's no need to convert to divs because you're using a
table as it should be used.
Mike Pepper
Accessible Web Developer
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Russ Weakley - Maxdesign
Se
Thank you guys
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:21:36 +1000, Mark Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jad
>
> That really looks like table data to me & so I think its best to keep
> it in tables. Tables are not evil in and of themselves, in fact they
> are very useful in cases like yours. Its just w
thank you Russ
you know what! I feel like you are the only one who can understand
What web is and what Web standards is
heh
Thank you mate
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 20:07:57 +1000, Russ Weakley - Maxdesign
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a perfect example of tabular data - it is semantically correc
The content you have there *is* tabular data, so
you should not attempt to get rid of the table at
all. Otherwise, you'll lose any semantic/structural
relationships between the headings and the data
cells. Incidentally, you should use TH with appropriate
scope for all your headings, e.g.:
Bronze
S
Hi Jad
That really looks like table data to me & so I think its best to keep
it in tables. Tables are not evil in and of themselves, in fact they
are very useful in cases like yours. Its just when they are abused
that the problems start.
If I was to improve on that code, i'd start by moving all t
This is a perfect example of tabular data - it is semantically correct
inside a table. Instead of thinking of ways to convert it into divs, you
should be working on implementing accessibility features:
id, headers for, summary, caption, etc.
A rough example if id's and headers in action is here:
h
WinSyntax for winsucks
BlueFish for mandrake
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:17:55 +1000, James Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> I have started a new category on the WSG site call "Development and
> design tools". I think at this point it would be a good idea for
> everyone to login
well its not bad to perform a search for you :P
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 01:35:46 -0700, Rick Faaberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 6/7/04 1:26 AM "Mark Stanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
>
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=min-width+IE
>
> So people don't actually answer questions he
Greetings
I'm trying to replace this table
http://www.easyhttp.com/temp/plans.html
with a table-less layout using only CSS divs no tables
any idea how to do it ?
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.
Hi Cristhian,
thank you for your comments and your time.
On which platform did you test my layout? mac or pc? with which version?
I have tested it with Firefox on 2 different pc and everithing worked fine.
Let me know
Cheers
Nicola
- Original Message -
From: "Cristhian Palma" <[EMAIL
Title: Message
thank you for your welcome and for your comments
about my website :-)
I know what you meand about the closing border...
it's one of the things I don't like so much in that layout,
but I think I'll make the entire content column
spanning from top to bottom of the browser windo
On 6/7/04 1:26 AM "Mark Stanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out:
> http://www.google.com/search?q=min-width+IE
So people don't actually answer questions here, they perform google searches
for you?
Cool! ;-)
Rick Faaberg
*
The discussion li
http://www.google.com/search?q=min-width+IE
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*
On 7 Jun 2004, at 06:39, Sam Walker wrote:
How would you go about selecting the markers on an ordered list to
style them? I want to style the 1,2,3,4 markers (or in this case, I.
II. III. IV. , as i have the style set to upper-roman) with things
such as size and color
Always a tricky problem thi
Im starting to create a Fluid CSS design, which im finding to be quite and arse
in IE...
But anyways, i've got the basic layout created, but i would now like to have a
min-width, but just cant think of a way of getting it to work in IE.
So what im asking is... Does anyone know a min-width work ar
Yes true, but the hover seems to work just fine in
IE6/Win
I am not complaining! :)
Regards, Amit Karmakar www.karmakars.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
StratfordSent: Monday, 7 June 2004 4:23 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [WSG] Help with I
You now have a problem that it doesn’t
look correct in IE5 without the 100%
So maybe do something like – in the
actual page:
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
Ph: 02 9570 9875
Mobile: 0419
350 760
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au
Bl
60 matches
Mail list logo
