Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Lucien Stals wrote: Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. Yes, well it really is a let down viewing a site in Safari or OmniWeb and then viewing it in IE or FF. I am finding quite a few client

Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

Kevin Ross wrote: Hi all, I am trying to find a solution to a nagging problem. Most of my client's sites are not very dynamic and I update them as the client requires. Because the updates are very infrequent, I have not been charging very much for this ongoing support. However, I have a ne

RE: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

I get my clients to install SeaMonkey which has an inbuilt editor & FTP client and is really good for basic text edits. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ Cheers Helen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Gollan Sent: Tuesday, 10

Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

Thanks guys... I'm going to see what's happening on the CMS List. Regards... On 7/9/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In short yes it would probably be best... I had the same problem with a client and so I gave him the website in WordPress, so now I only do major style/ structure c

[WSG] Re: Client - Site Edits

Hi all, My apologies. I was just re-reading my own posts to this site and had forgotten that I had already asked this question, at least in part. I would still appreciate knowing how others would handle this situation. Regards, On 7/9/07, Kevin Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Lucien Stals wrote: Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can only think of Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until Leopard gets released). So even once you have it validating, practically nobody will be able

Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

In short yes it would probably be best... I had the same problem with a client and so I gave him the website in WordPress, so now I only do major style/ structure changes and he handles the content changes himself >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/2007 11:36:34 am >>> I am also wondering if a CMS sys

Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

Kevin Ross wrote: I am wondering for advice on this situation and I am also wondering how others handle ongoing updates after the initial design has been implemented. I am also wondering if a CMS system would, in any way, be a solution to a situation like this. Probably more appropriate for t

[WSG] Client - Site Edits

Hi all, I am trying to find a solution to a nagging problem. Most of my client's sites are not very dynamic and I update them as the client requires. Because the updates are very infrequent, I have not been charging very much for this ongoing support. However, I have a new client who wants to m

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can only think of Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until Leopard gets released). So even once you have it validating, practically nobody will be able to appreciated your f

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On Jul 9, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when you try to validate a file. Yes I see, but how do you link a "Valid CSS" icon to an advanced search? Thanks, Dean *

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dean Matthews wrote: I thought I was dense but now I think the W3C is just behind the curve ;-) Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when you try to validate a file. Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh ***

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Cameron Singe wrote: am probaly wrong, but i think text-shadow is a CSS3 spec which might not be picked up by the validation Nope, your right. I thought I was dense but now I think the W3C is just behind the curve ;-) Dean ***

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Text-shadow's part of the CSS3 spec and not CSS 2.1 isn't it? So if you're validating against CSS 2.1, you'll get an error. On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:03:46 +1000, Dean Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here: Value Error : text-shadow

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

Hey dean, I am probaly wrong, but i think text-shadow is a CSS3 spec which might not be picked up by the validation On 7/10/07, Dean Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here: Value Error : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn't exis

[WSG] Shadow validation

I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here: Value Error : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn't exist : #7f7f7f 2px 2px 2px Offending CSS: h2, h3 { margin: 24px 0 0; font-size: 1.4em; text-shadow: #7f7f7f 2px 2px 2px; color: #25447d;

[WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest

I am currently out of the office. If you need urgent assistance please contact Stephen Mahoney on 02 9215 9032 or 0403 090 022 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards Neville Clarkson Senior Business Analyst - Online Information The Australia Council for the Arts --

Re: [WSG] Re: Microformats was [ Is this a good use of dl ]

I m sorry !!I m learngin,I new thanks God bless you!! 2007/7/8, James Jeffery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Microformats are about creating standards, standards for software vendors and web developers. In the future, with the use of powerful web technologies search engines and such will be able to aggr