On 11/18/05, John Allsopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Very interested in people's thoughts,Interesting and challenging idea John. I'll be keeping a keen eye on the site as it develops.
We've tried for years to organise a similar ideal within our own crew
here and while I'm sure a pattern exists,
I'd have to agree with Patrick. Poking into the DOM and adding the
autocomplete attribute is clean enough for the sort of thing you are
doing.
I look at it this way.. the markup is what the web server sends. The
DOM gives us hooks into the document once its loaded into the browsers
memory. I'm su
Thanks John,
Really appreciate your work on this.
Cheers
Chris B
We tested DW8 recently, Contribute 3 also uses this latest renderer.
Its CSS support is a big improvement over the previous version.
It still has a way to go yet. We picked up some issues with negative
margins and other issues regarding floats. But if you keep these little
issues in mind when bui
G'day
Came across this the other day;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_of_Internet_Explorer
Cheers
Chris
Fluid, simple, clean, valid, green yet warm, big fonts ( like big hair )
Nice work Andy. I like it.
Form input elements that are - alternative - content within an
should not be submitted to the webserver via a post or
get, I agree with Vlad, its a bug.
However whether the element is available from the DOM is another
question. Once the document strcuture has been passed by the browser
and the D
On 9/19/05, Martin Heiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on Montag, 19. September 2005 at 11:01 you wrote:> CSS or you can change the HTML output to
> become some_text and define .red in the CSS as> well. Simplified example maybe but it explains things a little bit.But you mix structure and visual disp
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:39, Al Sparber wrote:
> From: "John Allsopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > So the use of tables appears to be associated strongly with invalid
> > documents (and not only through poorly formed documents, but also
> > through the use of invalid attributes associated with td and
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:32, Chris Blown wrote:
>
> I can tab fine through that page. Using FF v1.0.4 under Linux.
>
Correction.. I can't tab through this. :|
http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/archives/flash_satay_fir
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:38, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
>
> Check out the example page in firefox.
>
> http://www.splintered.co.uk/experiments/76/
I can tab fine through that page. Using FF v1.0.4 under Linux.
**
The discussion list for http
ipsum dolor sit
> amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr,
> sed diam nonumy eirmod.
>
>
>
> cheers
> Geoff.
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Behalf Of Chris Blown
> > Sent: Thursday, 12
Just a quick question..
I am wondering what techniques people would use to layout a paragraph of
text with two right floated images and have the text wrap around the
images as shown.
The main thing is the two images need to both be bottom aligned to each
other ;)
I have a couple of ideas, but t
I'd be pointing you towards styling and elements
rather than using or
Good examples
http://www.themaninblue.com/experiment/InForm/
Cheers
Chris
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 13:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good evening all,
>
> I know there's two schools of thought regarding forms where one uses
Kay Smoljak wrote:
What other options are there, apart from complex, expensive CMS setups
(or forgetting about standards)?
I've had a lot of success with Macromedia Contribute. You can pick up
a copy for around AUD $220 from Harvey Norman or Harris Technology, it
totally resp
Um.. Sorry I see what you are trying to do now.. I read that a bit too
fast the first time ...
Good question!
Chris Blown wrote:
how about
a img {
... }
though i'd rather see
#nav a img {
...
}
See for more info --->
http://www.westciv.com/style_master/academy/css_tutorial/s
how about
a img {
...
}
though i'd rather see
#nav a img {
...
}
See for more info --->
http://www.westciv.com/style_master/academy/css_tutorial/selectors/descendant_selectors.html
Cheers
Chris
RMW Web Publishing wrote:
I trying do solve a selector (see
http://css.maxdesign.com.au/selectutoria
> On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 10:03, John Allsopp wrote:
> >
> > Being the eternal naysayer that I am, I'll say, um, nay.
> >
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:35, Bruce Morrison wrote:
>
> Also it should be noted that IE7 will only be for Longhorn and XP SP2.
> Older IE browsers will be with us for a while ye
This doesn't appear to have been posted to the list yet. Sorry in
advance if it has.
http://news.com.com/Reversal+Next+IE+update+divorced+from+Windows/2100-1032_3-5577263.html
Good news for web standards?
Chris
**
The discussion list for http
digilander.libero.it/chiediloapippo/Engineering/iarchitect/shame.htm
Regards
Chris Blown
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
I hesitantly suggest a good place for this discussion would be on Justin
French's Interface list.
http://lists.indent.com.au/mailman/listinfo/interface
Cheers
Chris Blown
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
curity angle is the only one that seems to get the
point through at the moment.
I strongly believe that Microsoft are fully aware of their strangle hold
and until something like Firefox becomes a significant threat, they will
sit by idle without a care in the world and claim that IE is everything
th
the value has been updated the CSS is not
applied. [1]
I wonder if switching stylesheets would force an update?
Regards
Chris Blown
[1] http://www.hinterlands.com.au/testing/attribute_selectors.html
**
The discussion list for http://w
hopefully enable us to create far more accessible
websites in the near future [3].
The more developers out there who know about vxml and its associated
technologies will help it move into the mainstream [4].
Take a look..
Cheers
Chris Blown
[1] Working Draft - http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD
uld be nice, so that you could build flash into you own custom
application, but for most Linux users the pre-built Flash plugin is fine
and MM provide builds for most browsers. Opera under Linux for example
can happily use the firefox flash plugin.
Regards
Chris Blown
[1] http://mplayerplug-in.so
arkup to get it
straight.
Though there is a case for this in relation to reducing CSS redundancy.
Regards
Chris Blown
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
ad, I can't
recall.. ;)
"and look to make it blue all you do is change the class name to from
red to blue, pretty cool eh?"
*shivers*
Regards
Chris Blown
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webst
Thought this might be a worthwhile link for WSG members.
Please send flames off list ;)
Microsoft says Firefox not a threat to IE
http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+Firefox+not+a+threat+to+IE/2100-1032_3-5448719.html
**
The discussion list for
tâs
always struck me as one of the biggest missed opportunities of CSS."
Its a damn shame really.
Regards
Chris Blown
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 22:14, Dean Jackson wrote:
> ..
> Would you intentionally build a car park that stopped Toyotas from
> entering?
>
If there was a lot of Toyotas parking in my building and being that they
all leaked oil in my car park and often their drivers scratched other
peoples cars beca
rrgh!
I think the points raised here, very much hit the nail on the head.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2004Sep/0074.html
Regards
Chris Blown
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgro
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 16:22, Justin French wrote:
> Can anyone either:
> - suggest an alternate way to achieve this, or
This might help
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/methods/attachevent.asp
if (anchor.attachEvent) anchor.attachEvent("onClick", );
**
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 23:44, James Ellis wrote:
> What I've done is probably not done often but it is worth considering.
> Firefox ships with its minimum font size turned off.
>
I also use the very same setting.
It can be a common adjustment for people who use XFree86 or X.org under
unix ( and
ugh it seems a perfectly secure practise, visitors might be
reluctant entering sensitive data into their browser without the closed
little pad lock icon appearing ;)
Cheers
Chris Blown
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
post request. Or does it?
One example is www.americanexpress.com.au which happily accepts members
password from the ( http ) front page and posts to a https server.
I guess the next question is can you post a clear text request to a
https server without complaint?
Regards
Chris Blown
Andy Budd wrote:
So I'm interested to hear what you folks think. Do you hack or are you
hack free? If you hack, what methods do you use, why do you use that
method, and more importantly, why do you need it in the first place?
I try to avoid them.
Just this week I had some really good results ha
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 10:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why is the Firefox browser used by Web Developers? What does it have that
> makes it a good tool? - over other browsers? Why not Opera?
DOM Inspector
Venkman Javascript Debugger
Edit CSS
Browser Session Saving
Open Bookmark Groups in T
Hi All
I just noticed that our discussion on "XHTML 1.0 Transitional and
autocomplete" went off list.
I've posted this in hopes that others may benefit from the info.
Cheers
Chris Blown
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 13:00, Peter Asquith wrote:
> Chris
>
> Thanks for the ti
access to these IE settings for
certain user groups so they can't go and turn it back on.
Regards
Chris Blown
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 11:08, Peter Asquith wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm in the process of validating the markup in a suite of on-line
> assessment tools, which includes an
CSS signatures ?
Here http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/13291
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 17:55, Mordechai Peller wrote:
> Putting an id or class on the html or body tags is a useful way of
> targeting slight variations in style rules with resorting to a second
> style sheet.
>
> I r
by your browser
then the best method is to use a local proxy like proximitron. Of course
under Firefox you can use the "Live HTTP headers" extension which is
awesome.
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 22:44, Chris Stratford wrote:
> Im not 100%
Thats _really_ bad
Browser checking is a thing of the past and should be gladly forgotten.
Something that we can all thank the web standards project for.
Is there a valid reason to do browser checking? I can't think of one...
Regards
Chris Blown
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 10:30, Neerav
http://www.sitepoint.com/syndication/
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 10:45, Neerav wrote:
> I have recently become a fan of RSS feeds as an efficient way to trawl
> the net for interesting news and articles, and would appreciate knowing
> which web standards related rss feeds you read
>
> Here are 3 go
Some good reading / opinions on this here. ( esp. in Comments )
http://www.9rules.com/whitespace/design/iframes_vs_overflow.php
Regards
Chris Blown
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 15:10, Chris wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I the process of a design that begs overflow: auto; what is theopinion
> on th
That is true, however already knowing of such hacks enables you to make
this kind of judgement. So for the purpose of education these should
help you out John
http://diveintomark.org/safari/csshacks/
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=CssHack
Enjoy or not ;)
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 18:15, Ka
Thats funny Mark..
I happened to hit Froogle by accident after following that link and look
what I found..
http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=min-width%20IE&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wf
Good to see Westciv in there. eh John?
Regards
Chris Blown
On Mon, 2004-06-07 at
Yeah, I second that... Russ should be on the list too.. ;)
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 11:12, Kay Smoljak wrote:
> you know who I'd like to see interviewed? That Russ guy who runs that cool
> site...
>
> :)
>
> --
> Kay Smoljak
> Senior Developer/QC Leader/Search Optimisation
> PerthWeb Pty Ltd - http
Nice work again.. Thanks Russ!
On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 14:00, russ - maxdesign wrote:
>
> Read Ten Questions for Simon Willison here:
> http://webstandardsgroup.org/features/simon-willison.cfm
>
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgro
tter of it... :)
Chris Blown
PS. I only just realised that the original thread had no subject, I
completely missed that one.. I need a beer..
Alan Milnes wrote:
I think part of this debate is because many developers have years of
experience and know all the tricks of getting tables laid out how
often lead to compromises. I'd rather have as much
presentation in CSS as possible with one table than the horrible mess
shown in that article. Its an easy choice really.
Regards
Chris Blown
Jamie Mason wrote:
Tables are for tabular data only, not for use for layouts as a
positional grid
I would like to see a third version that uses a combination of the two,
the best of each method merged.. The Hybrid Approach.
Regards
Chris Blown
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 17:41, Gary Menzel wrote:
> > Sergio Villarreal has written 'Tables Vs. CSS - A Fight to the
> Death',
>
Sorry, I just couldn't let this one go.. Its a common misconception that
you cannot sell open source software.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
;)
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:56, Justin French wrote:
> Screw opensource -- I would pay serious cash for such a tool! This is
> MUCH better
That's true, running IE6 under Linux via wine [1] even introduces extra
quirks and bugs, which I sometimes falsely blame IE for until I go an
actually check on XP. It does work relatively well though, and its handy
for quick testing.
Regards
Chris Blown
[1] http://www.winehq.com
On Wed,
Ooops, that should of been ;)
if ( document.getElementById("name").value == "" )
{
alert("Please enter a name");
}
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 11:26, robert e. lee wrote:
> I have had a form up for a long time and it vallidates as xhtml 1.0
> transitional. But I have to wonder why it is that
You should be able to do all your client side checking using DOM access
methods. The name attribute in form is no longer needed nor desirable.
Rough example
if ( document.getElementById("name") == "" )
{
alert("Please enter a name");
}
Cheers
Chris
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 11:26, robert
That's what we did.
We have one little lonely eMac in our office for browser testing and
other Mac related development projects. It was a necessary upgrade since
the old Power PC 7200/120 just couldn't cope anymore.
Chris
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:19, Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
> You'd be better
At some stage, but that does look different to what I recall.
Certainly a step in the right direction.
On Thu, 2004-05-20 at 14:22, Mark Stanton wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
> Have you tried turning on verbose output? This can be done by going to
> the extended interface at http://validator.w3.org/detaile
Good point Jamie.
Just a way out thought..
Imagine if the w3c validator went that extra mile and perhaps, given the
recommendations offered in the standard, provided some extra feedback on
problem areas of a document.
eg.
Warning : Line 100 to 150 : Document contains heavy element nesting
Wh
es and it
seems easy now, but here read this, and get back to me" hand them a good
book on modern markup authoring techniques. If they see the light then
great, otherwise .. well tough.
The popular response to Andy's article that using the odd table without
For Mozilla based browsers, have a look here.
http://devedge.netscape.com/toolbox/sidebars/
Though no mention of browser support, links into the correct section of
the w3c are very helpful.
Chris
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 01:46, Razvan Pop wrote:
> !!blue wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Where can I fi
ou managed to do it ;)
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 10:14, James Ellis wrote:
> Sorry about this everyone, flames to my address if you want. Trying again from
> scratch.
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>
>
>
>
vertical-align : bottom;
On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 15:54, theGrafixGuy wrote:
> A CSS question - I have some centered text formatted via a class in id=""> and I need it at the bottom of the div but still HORIZONTALLY
> centered - how?
>
> Thanks for the help in advance
>
> Brian
>
> **
rt.com/articles/tableruler/
I used to think reliability was an issue, but that changed one I
realised that most modern browsers all maintain a standard DOM
interface.
Now if I could only poke into the DOM with CSS... ;)
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hin
I am correct in saying that xstandard doesn't support Linux and Mac OS?
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 13:34, Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> One way to pick the right editor for your needs is to go to the Web sites of
> WYSIWYG vendors and check the quality of the code they generate fo
ask
them to upgrade, offering some of the benefits. Surprisingly most people
upgrade when provided a link.
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 09:19, Mark Stanton wrote:
> I agree with Ryan - coding for specific browsers is a futile excerise.
>
> We do use
You've caught me out Simon! I might of let that statement play devils
advocate, so I could get up on the soap box for a bit. ;)
Regards
Chris Blown
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 00:58, Simon Jessey wrote:
> I'm afraid you've misinterpreted what I was trying to say, Chris. What
> I
is already
happening ) Microsoft might just sit up and take notice.
The real issue is, Microsoft have the power, resources and money to free
these features to the world and truth be told they don't care...
Regards
Chris Blown
*
Th
Have a look at
http://devedge.netscape.com/toolbox/examples/2001/stock-ticker/
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 16:22, Jackie Reid wrote:
> My client has asked me for a section of scrolling text dammit!
>
>
> Have searched online...cant f
Nice work Russ.. keep them coming!
Eric's level headed attitude never fails to impress.
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:01, russ - maxdesign wrote:
> Hi all,
> Announcing an exciting addition to the WSG site. I have been interviewing a
>
Yep, I hear you.. IE on Mac, has a real disdain for me.
The site looks great BTW.
I'd get the content validating on the w3c and then see if the IE
problems continue. For example, the missing on line 114.
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 13:45, Ben
Hey Mike,
Check here http://scott.sauyet.name/CSS/Demo/FooterDemo2.html
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:01, Mike Kear wrote:
> I want to have a footer stuck to the bottom of the browser window, but
> if the window reduces in size, the footer goes ov
You can put the favicon.ico file in the webroot. This works without the
need for any markup.
However this doesn't work for IE. Works fine other browsers. IE is also
picky about the file format.
Cheers
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 13:35, Universal Head
Very nice Peter. Smooth and clean is all good.
I used to play around with Cinema 4D on the go ole Amiga. Heh, that
brings back some fond memories. ;)
Cheers
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 11:49, Universal Head wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Just about to be o
Thank you.. Mr Weakley. :D
>
> Does all of this make sense? If not, there is more on specificity here:
> http://css.maxdesign.com.au/selectutorial/advanced_conflict.htm
>
> Forgive me for sounding like a school teacher :)
> Russ
>
>
*
Th
he members choice of colours it does stop
members from setting the text and background colours both to black. I've
seen this sort of thing before and it goes something like this
"Why can't I see anything its all black?"
Regards
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
On Wed, 2
rrent activity high volume by a long shot, if you want volume
join something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] :|
Pushing the idea of reading and searching the WSG mail archive before
posting is a good way to reduce lots of repeat questions.
Overall I think the list is great.
Regards
Chris Blown
That's good advice.
BTW. Using tables doesn't automatically make your markup invalid. You
can happily use tables and still get 100% compliant markup.
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
> Why not just relax a little and do a table for the part that's giving you
> all th
Yeah, sorry I should of mentioned that Dan Cederholm is well aware of
it.
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 12:57, Michael Zeltner wrote:
> oops, it has already been reported...
>
> too late...
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
I cannot not believe this.. How can someone be so dumb and lazy to do
such a blatant rip off. Is this for real?
I just had to post this, it boils my blood to see this sort of thing!
http://www.simplebits.com/
http://ranada.com/home.xhtml
Cheers
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
tion of said
content.
Regards
Chris Blown
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 15:57, scott parsons wrote:
> OK, I have a question then with most image replacement techniques for
> headings the content remains in the html
> eg. title here please
>
> But is an image of this text in a pretty font or
but presentation.
I agree with the idea that using the content property for adding content
is a bad idea, but using content for replacement is not so bad as
everyone is making out.
Anyway since only a couple of browsers support this, its not a real
alternative, yet...
Cheers
Chris Blown
> Per
users who don't have this font. From my
experience with Linux "Times" is the most common.
font-family : Times New Roman, Times, serif;
Regards
Chris Blown
> Dave Shea has some nice examples of using Times New Roman, half way
> through the article at:
> http://www.mezzobl
Also
http://www.hinterlands.com.au/testing/css_image_replacement.html
http://www.hinterlands.com.au/testing/css/css_image_replacement.css
Chris
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 14:55, Scott Mebberson wrote:
> I'm not sure about any font examples like the Visibone one, however, did
> you ever see this at
right direction.
Any thoughts?
Cheers
Chris Blown
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
The "menus" div is overlapping "sidemenu" causing the top entry in the
menu to miss its hover selector ( at least in FireFox here )
Regards
Chris Blown
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 15:18, Chris Blown wrote:
> Good stuff.. Mike.
>
> Not sure if its just me, but I no
Good stuff.. Mike.
Not sure if its just me, but I noticed that the
Acoustic Emission
Instrumentation
link only hovers when my mouse is over "Instrumentation"
Linux FireFox 0.8 ( gtk2 / xft )
Cheers
Chris Blown
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 13:45, Michael Kear wrote:
> Whooh! I
this technique, very handy for checking keywords.
Cheers
Chris Blown
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:16, Universal Head wrote:
> Dumb question but ...
>
> Do you repeat your META tags on every page of your site, or only the
> index page?
&g
meta tags should generally be added to each page, listing keywords that
are accurately relevant to the content on the page.
Keep the list short and precise.
Cheers
Chris Blown
PS. Not all search engines read nor care about meta keywords
On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:16, Universal Head wrote
The first draft of the 'reader' media type. Published to get some early
feedback, especially on whether 'reader' is necessary and implementable.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-css3-reader-20040224/
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsg
Sorry I missed it guys, looks like I missed a good one.. damn!
Thanks for posting the presentation slides..
Regards
Chris Blown
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 22:50, t.lucas wrote:
> Tonight was my first WSG meeting and I'd just like to say a big thanks to
> Russ and Peter for organising s
used in CSS.
http://www.voicexml.org/specs/multimodal/x+v/11/examples/
Still a long way to go...
Regards
Chris Blown
> Another interesting point is that (AFAIK) screen readers have some of the
> worst CSS support out of any of the browsers barring lynx (which doesn't
> support C
3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/
http://xml.coverpages.org/patents.html [ Warning : Super Long ]
Regards
Chris Blown
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
matted
"Last-Modifed".
Thanks
Chris Blown
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 13:41, Mark Stanton wrote:
> I really don't think this is OT at all. HTTP is the basis of everything we
> do and is very much a "web standard".
>
> I think that if you put the following line o
server responds with a "304 Not
Modified" response when the image is cached, so that the browser doesn't
bother to reload the image. I cannot seem to emulate this behaviour via
a fpassthru() PHP call.
Regards
Chris Blown
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 10:04, Mark Stanton wrote:
> Ve
s on how ~430px (whats the em?) is
> about the right line length - @ alistapart although where it is I don't
> know as the search function has disappeared from that site.
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>
> Chris Blown wrote:
>
> >Thought I'd share this one w
their
eyes"
LOL!
Cheers
Chris Blown
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
or="car0"
id="car0"
for="car1"
id="car1"
and still happily use
name="cars[]"
Regards
Chris Blown
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 15:03, James Ellis wrote:
> This also reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask:
>
> When submitt
rdf-syntax-grammar-20040210/
Regards
Chris Blown
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
If you need something quick then
http://www.hotscripts.com/cgi-bin/search.cgi?bool=AND&query=contact+form&catid=all
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 18:02, Universal Head wrote:
> I don't know if this is on-topic or not, but can anyone direct me to a
> simple way of creating a form that has a few fields t
.
Cheers
Chris Blown
> A bit of protocol. Might be best to start a new thread (and paste in any
> quotes) rather than changing the subject if changing the topic completely.
> Makes it easier for people that view the list via threads on
> mail-archive.com. Much of the recent discussi
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
