RE: [WSG] [CSS] IE6 header issue.

Hi Nick Try: H1 {position: relative;} This might help; I came up against the same problem in IE6 and found that this fixed the problem. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Lo Sent: Sunday, 21 March 2004 4:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [WSG] mysterious space

I agree with James that you might need to re-look at the way you are doing this, but I think a better way to accomplish it would be to style a list. Therefore you won't run into any adjacent link problems with accessibility validation - (WCAG 1.0 AAA - point 10.3)   Anyway here’s a link t

RE: [WSG] CSS and form button question

I agree - you could also create a DOM script that would look for a tag of "input" with an attribute type="submit" and then add a class to it i.e. class="submit" Cheers Jeff Lowder www.accessibility1st.com.au -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [WSG] articledates and bylines

Hi Martin If it is a "Heading" yes it's semantic, if not - it's not semantic. If it's not a heading I would probable use something like this: March 23 - 2004 Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/ -Original

RE: [WSG] Font size, and how large is large enough?

Hi Darian This article might answer your questions http://www.alistapart.com/articles/sizematters/ Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [WSG] IE5 Mac Doosey

This page shows how you can target just IE5 for Mac: http://www.sam-i-am.com/work/sandbox/css/mac_ie5_hack.html   hope this helps.   Cheers   Jeff Lowder Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [WSG] Browser compliance

Hi Martin I've just tried it and go to "Options">"Settings" then click on "Browse" and there is an option to select "use Netscape" (will use the mozilla engine if you don't have Netscape. Hope this helps Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessi

RE: [WSG] Image replacement

Title: Image replacement Here’s a link to one that uses that type: http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2003/12/12/accessible_i/#c002804   Cheers   Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/     -Original M

RE: [WSG] Scrollbars in IE6 (PC)

In the frameset you'll need to add this attribute: scrolling="no" - although it would be preferable not to use frames at all. Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [WSG] Scrollbars in IE6 (PC)

I would still like to know Cheers Just wondering if you know that you can make navigation items stay fixed in one position (which used to be the main reason for using frames), without using frames. i.e. http://www.saila.com/usage/layouts/ I would be really interested to find out why you have to

RE: [WSG] RE: Display issues

Try this: html>body .cssbtn{vertical-align:0px;} I'm pretty sure this will fix it. Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of theGrafi

RE: [WSG] Firefox 0.8 bug?

Title: RE: [WSG] Firefox 0.8 bug? Hi Justin I'm running XP with Firefox 0.8 and I'm not getting any of the problems you are, so I'm stumped. Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/ Hi all, I'm playing around

RE: [WSG] Layout 39% not 39%

Title: Message Hi Taco For starters you can’t have “,” within your statement i.e. it should be:   padding: 14px 0 0 0;   and I think you want the padding to be 9% from the left side is that correct?   Cheers   Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Ph: 02 9570 9875 Mobile: 0419 350 7

RE: [WSG] *sigh* drop-downs

Hi Justin, I know what you mean. Here's a good place to start. Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin French Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2004 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [WSG] *sigh* drop-downs

Sorry mate, here's the URL: http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/navigation.h tml#menus Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin French Sen

RE: [WSG] target="_blank" substitute

Hi Darian This is both an accessible and valid method: new window Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darian Cabot Sent:

RE: [WSG] target="_blank" substitute

Hi Patrick I think Michael is right, sometimes in life you have to do stuff that isn't perfect. In my example I had a TITLE attribute in the A link saying that it would open a new window - someone with a screen reader would hear that the link would open a new window, if they have disabled JavaScri

Re: [WSG] why oh why

Sorry I can't replicate the problem - Firefox 1.0 on XP and Mac Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au Blog: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au/journal/ On 24/11/04 9:59 AM, "Web Usability" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A frien

Re: [WSG] Semantic markup for publication titles

I would use the CITE tag, Cite: contains a citation or a reference to other sources (http://www.w3.org/TR/html4?struct/text.html#h-9.2.1) if this is what you're after. Cheers Jeff On 17/12/04 4:05 PM, "Andy Kirkwood | MOTIVE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SEMANTIC MARKUP FOR PUBLICATION TITLES >

Re: [WSG] pop quiz: calculating specificity of group selectors

They are both equal, because of the comma separation. Cheers Jeff Lowder Accessibility 1st Website: http://www.accessibility1st.com.au On 15/12/04 9:46 AM, "John Allsopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps someone has seen, or has a definitive answer to this question > > which has the highe