Thank you Lea. I removed the tag, and added the tag with a rule
applied to the
cite element that bolds the authors name. Seems to be the best of both worlds.
Kind regards,
Mario
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 22:58:19 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
>> Isn't < b > still valid? If you want to have a weig
Michael,
I understand that the Internet is an electronic medium, and I’m quite
aware of all the
browser nuances and additional devices employed to render websites. However,
what I said was that
the Internet is also a visual medium, which is an important aspect of site
design that must be
consid
On 10/3/05, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So... is there any way to define this relationship? Or is it just
> order-of-content and hoping it makes sense? What if you were to put the
> cite after the quote for whatever reason (style guide convention, etc)?
Sorry Josh, there's no attrib
Paul Bennett wrote:
Joe Coyle, President, www.coylemedical.com
Mr. Cisneros and his team have an extraordinary talent for customer
communication, market vision, and web pageb design.
There seems to be a tendency lately to use definition lists for way more
than I think they're supposed to be
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 22:58:19 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
> Isn't < b > still valid? If you want to have a weightless way of bolding the
> text, but don't want to mess with a span, use < b > .
Yes, its 'valid', for low values of valid, but wrapping a cite element
around the name screams 'this i
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:58 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
> Isn't < b > still valid? If you want to have a weightless way of
> bolding the text, but don't want to mess with a span, use < b > .
Yes. It's in the presentation module for XHTML 1.1
(
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/abstra
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:39 +1000, Lea de Groot wrote:
> I would give strong consideration to:
> Joe Coyle, President
> .testimonialname cite {font-weight:bold}
>
> and think about working a q element into the actual quote-paragraph.
This immediately seems to make sense, but I'm left wondering
Isn't < b > still valid? If you want to have a weightless way of bolding the text, but don't want to mess with a span, use < b > . On 10/2/05,
Lea de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:23:50 +1000, Joshua Street wrote:> Joe Coyle, President and add> the rule> .testimonialname
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:23:50 +1000, Joshua Street wrote:
> Joe Coyle, President and add
> the rule
> .testimonialname span {font-weight:bold}
I would give strong consideration to:
Joe Coyle, President
.testimonialname cite {font-weight:bold}
and think about working a q element into the actual q
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:00 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since the testimonial is basically a quote, why not use the element?
> Then use the presidents name within the element. This way it is
> semantic, and you still get to style the presidents name any way that you
> feel fit!
>
> Chee
ilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Homepage Review: webnetdesignstudios.com
Hi,
I haven't followed this thread completely, but I wanted to comment on this
specific post because some of your comments caught my eye and another vi
On 3/10/2005, at 2:28 PM, Paul Bennett wrote:
There seems to be a tendency lately to use definition lists for
way more than I think they're supposed to be used for.
As someone who was at WE05, Tantek mentioned that using DL, DT and DD
for anything other than definition lists is "abuse!":
<
>
> Joe Coyle, President, www.coylemedical.com Mr. Cisneros and his
> team have
> an extraordinary talent for customer communication, market vision, and web
> page
> design.
feel free to bite my head off - I haven't been following this thread closely.
There seems to be a tendency lately t
Hi,
I haven't followed this thread completely, but I wanted to comment on
this specific post because some of your comments caught my eye and
another view may come in handy.
However, I think using to emphasize the author of the
testimonial is perfectly acceptable.
Because it's not going to
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 12:22 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I appreciate your input, and I concur with some of your points, and will
> apply the changes
> accordingly. However, I think using to emphasize the author of the
> testimonial is
> perfectly acceptable. To create a rule and use tag i
Hi Josh,
I appreciate your input, and I concur with some of your points, and will apply
the changes
accordingly. However, I think using to emphasize the author of the
testimonial is
perfectly acceptable. To create a rule and use tag is overkill.
Additionally, the image is
to provide a soft vi
Okay, most of the points I made still apply. 1) is out, because you've
ditched the JS menu. 2, 3, 4, 5 (less now) and 7 still apply. You've got
images where you could be using background images in a H4 for the
special offers section, and I'd lean towards doing part of your
testimonial bit different
Josh,
My sincere apologies!!
I failed to provide the URL to the development environment for the redesign:
http://www.webnetdesignstudios.com/index1.htm
This is my current site, and one of the reasons I've decided to implement a
re-design.
Sorry for the miscommunication.
Kind regards,
Mario
A few suggestions, in order of markup.
1) The JS menus are okay, if everything listed in them is accessible
some other way.
2) Your non-JavaScript link list (topnavbar) should be a list. And the
bullet images would be better as background images or
list-style-image's.
3) Instead of having an ima
Dear Mates,
I'm in the process of re-designing my company site, and I've started with the
homepage. Please
know that it's in development environment, and I plan to re-do all the interior
pages once I'm
confident that my CSS, XHTML and design are standards compliant. Obviously, I
thought it prud
20 matches
Mail list logo
