[WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay

2005-07-20 Thread Jamie Mason
http://www.blatek.co.uk/blateksatay/ I quite like it, what do you think?

Re: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay

2005-07-20 Thread infopre
--- From: Jamie Mason To: 'wsg@webstandardsgroup.org' Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:10 AM Subject: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay http://www.blatek.co.uk/blateksatay/ I quite like it, what do you think?

Re: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay

2005-07-20 Thread James Ellis
Hi The idea of the cascading object tag is to place alternate *descriptive* content that reflects the intent of the content the user can't access, rather than a no flash image. HTH James On 7/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so browser that doesn't support flash

Re: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay

2005-07-20 Thread Joshua Street
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 06:18 -0400, James Ellis wrote: The idea of the cascading object tag is to place alternate *descriptive* content that reflects the intent of the content the user can't access, rather than a no flash image. Is there anything wrong with having an image as an intermediate

Re: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay

2005-07-20 Thread infopre
] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:18 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay Hi The idea of the cascading object tag is to place alternate *descriptive* content that reflects the intent of the content the user can't access, rather than a no flash image. HTH

RE: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay

2005-07-20 Thread Patrick Lauke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes, but if you have flash plug-in, you cannot see alternative image. So, the only reason is that when you don't have flash installed, browser shows you image with alternative description. But what James is getting at is that from an accessibility and usability point of