In my personal opinion if you are linking in an article you should abay by
these rules
1 link on 1 image only
1 link as a source
1 link as a forwarder
that is all, any more and it will start affecting you seo as google and
even yahoo will take this as a spam attempt
Aaron Wheeler
On Thu, 25
tee wrote:
As far as SEO concerns, it seems to have an advantage because google
image search and a few other image search engines (can't remember
their names). This seems to be very useful for sites that sell
products, image stock and photographers
Have to keep that in mind when I'm looking
On Sep 25, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
tee wrote:
I was thinking maybe it's a SEO question and shouldn't post it
here, however, the more I think about it, the more I feel it
deserves a semantical perspective and wonder if it creates
obstacle for screen reader.
Might be
I was thinking maybe it's a SEO question and shouldn't post it here,
however, the more I think about it, the more I feel it deserves a
semantical perspective and wonder if it creates obstacle for screen
reader.
In a content block (a teaser or a product for example) where you have
an
im not an expert but i dont think it would help tee. dont think google
favors duplicate content anymore. but i dont know.
tee wrote:
I was thinking maybe it's a SEO question and shouldn't post it here,
however, the more I think about it, the more I feel it deserves a
semantical perspective
tee wrote:
I was thinking maybe it's a SEO question and shouldn't post it here,
however, the more I think about it, the more I feel it deserves a
semantical perspective and wonder if it creates obstacle for screen
reader.
Might be seen as noise, but can't see any other problems with
