This maybe OT, but should be useful to all web developers on the list,
because a site ight well be standards compliant but if it takes 30
seconds to load than its still failing ...
http://www.webpageanalyzer.com/ - Web Page Analyzer - 0.82
Test your web site speed with our free web-based
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 8:50 PM
To: WSG
Subject: [WSG] slightly OT web page analyser service
This maybe OT, but should be useful to all web developers on the list,
because a site ight well be standards compliant but if it takes 30 seconds
to load than its still failing ...
http
Neerav blurted out:
This maybe OT, but should be useful to all web developers on the list,
because a site ight well be standards compliant but if it takes 30
seconds to load than its still failing ...
I wouldn't say it was offtopic. Something like this could be used to
demonstrate the
Robert Moser wrote:
Something like this could be used to
demonstrate the advantages of using CSS vs table layout.
The only problem I can see is images referenced in the CSS are not taken
into account
Jason
*
The discussion list for
Nor is the fact that stylesheets (and images, for that matter) are
cached. You're only comparing a first hit on one page. One of the
beauties of CSS is that once you're past that first page, and into
other pages on the site, you're not going to be downloading table code
again and again and
I think the reason for that is that the structure of the page is built and
the images can d/l while the the content is in place and the reader can
begin seeing something atleast.
This tool (which I discovered last month as part of a plug-in for Mozilla
and Firefox) sold me the rest of the way on
