Paul Ross wrote:
If anyone wants to see the finished version check out:
http://www.books24x7.net.au - just don't view source on the New Releases page
Why is there a
al Head [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/03/04 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...
Good one Ross! Nice site ... though maybe a bit more leading in the
body copy would make it easy to read (sorry for being picky).
And by the way ... I'm
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...
As a footnote to this thread I want to add that I did in fact stick to
the light and the way and the website was launched as XHTML/CSS. In my
darkest hour of frustration I did try
Oops! That should have been Ross, not Paul Sorry about that.
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: Amit Karmakar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 4:09 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [WSG] turning back to the
by the way ... I'm your father. "
Am I to take it then that CSS is essentially a bunch of Jedi mind
tricks?
Brendan
From: Universal Head [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/03/04 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] turning back to
"And by the way ... I'm your father. "
Am I to take it then that CSS is essentially a bunch of Jedi mind tricks?
Brendan
From: Universal Head [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 09/03/04 4:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] turn
Good one Ross! Nice site ... though maybe a bit more leading in the body copy would make it easy to read (sorry for being picky).
And by the way ... I'm your father.
Peter ;)
On 09/03/2004, at 4:00 PM, Paul Ross wrote:
As a footnote to this thread I want to add that I did in fact stick to the
,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...
As a footnote to this thread I want to add that I did in fact stick to the
light and
As a footnote to this thread I want to add that I did in fact stick to the light
and the way and the website was launched as XHTML/CSS. In my darkest hour of
frustration I did try and re-do the pages with HTML tables and found that it was
causing more troubles than it was worth. So, I persisted an
Sorry for barging in here Michael.
This is a bit OT, but I need to send you (Michael Donnermeyer) a PM to: <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>.
So if you see, From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please open it, as it will be in plain text format with no attachments added.
I have already tried to email you, but received no r
You actually expect Microsoft to create a product that works?!?
How about one that follows standards? (RIGHT!)
All kidding aside, it's a royal pain in the U know what and it'll
probably result in 'pattern baldness' from ripping your own hair out,
but in the long run it'll be worth it. It's
fine on one site and not on
another.
Does that make sense or am I being a woolly-thinker as usual?
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
-Original Message-
From: Peter Firminger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 5 March 2004 6:26 PM
To
Hi Mike,
Just a few things that need clearing up...
> Why not just relax a little and do a table for the part
> that's giving you
> all the heartburn, and move on the rest of the site as
> compliant. The html
> wont validate, but will that really matter that much?
> That way you're still gettin
That's good advice.
BTW. Using tables doesn't automatically make your markup invalid. You
can happily use tables and still get 100% compliant markup.
Chris Blown
http://hinterlands.com.au
> Why not just relax a little and do a table for the part that's giving you
> all the heartburn, and move o
I totally agree, I did this with a site recently. The site is still great, still fast, and one simple two column table fixed all my woes. As I progress I become better and can design without the tables, like my last site (launching soon, I'll let you all know when it's up).
But yes, IE is crap.
P
l of us - users, site owners,
developers, designers, but its not worth getting ulcers over or missing
deadlines for.
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 5 March 2004 4:3
Hello Peter,
Yes, I remember your post a while back and was going through a similar pain at
the same time. Now it's getting serious as I have a tight deadline and IE is
stubbornly throwing down as many roadblocks as it can manage and testing my
sanity. If it wasn't for this list and other helpful
Hello David,
Thank you for taking the time to have a look and suggest a solution. So, it is
as simple as using display: inline and tweaking pixel dimensions?! I will give
it a go.
I have noticed this before about IE and I will try to refrain from swearing
here. If you have say 3 images of 100px
Hey, so this is what I sounded like when I went off my rocker a month or so back! ;)
Haven't got time to get into specifics right now Paul, sorry, but hang in there. I know EXACTLY how you feel. However I just made my first site where everything fell perfectly into place, I could re-use code from
#x27;m not sure why they are in there, and they don't need to be if you
rework the floats a little.
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] turning back to the dark side...
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:20:06 +1000
>
>Hello folks,
>
&g
20 matches
Mail list logo
